BeTaL-GBI: Admission-Aware Benchmark Tuning and Full-Stack Verification of Geometric Belief Interfaces
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21503v1
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 16:52:38 GMT
- Title: BeTaL-GBI: Admission-Aware Benchmark Tuning and Full-Stack Verification of Geometric Belief Interfaces
- Abstract summary: This study examines whether an enterprise verification architecture can isolate interface failure, task competence, policy admissibility, and control integrity while keeping claims auditable.<n>BeTaL-GBI v0.2 applies Benchmark Tuning with an LLM-in-the-loop over 2,218,750,380 grid points, separating format admission from conditional performance.<n>Across 512 synthetic tasks, a 16-gate policy detects all 116 injected severe contradictions and accepts all 99 clean records. Hallucinator and evidence-forger surrogates are blocked with zero silent promotions.
- Score: 2.894286977279531
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: A verification substrate is more credible when exposing errors in its own claims, not just model outputs. GBI-DCSE v3 falsified an architectural claim: the reported Fisher value epsilon ~ 0.066 satisfies the kappa^2 <= 10^4 budget only on the slice [epsilon, 3, 4, 5], while the full box [epsilon, 20]^4 requires epsilon ~ 0.326472. This erratum highlights whether an enterprise verification architecture can isolate interface failure, task competence, policy admissibility, and control integrity while keeping claims auditable. BoundaryBench v0.1 established the baseline: Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 completed 768 frozen executions, but 0% cleared the contract (369 failed parsing, 399 failed validation), limiting downstream selectivity metrics. This companion study evaluates three successive improvements. First, BeTaL-GBI v0.2 applies Benchmark Tuning with an LLM-in-the-loop over 2,218,750,380 grid points, separating format admission from conditional performance (rho_adm = N_admitted/N; rho_task = N_verified/N_admitted). Following schema repair, a model-free feedback search achieves a 2.87% mean held-out target gap, outperforming non-feedback baselines (13.61%, 11.46%). Second, GBI v2 swaps static keys for a reference-independent witness state W and policy P. Across 512 synthetic tasks, a 16-gate policy detects all 116 injected severe contradictions and accepts all 99 clean records (broad denominator: 4.27%). Hallucinator and evidence-forger surrogates are blocked with zero silent promotions. Third, GBI-DCSE v3 maps 99 claims to machine-readable evidence: 95 of 96 testable claims pass, with 148 standalone checks executed without failure. The harness exercises signed ledgers, PBFT quorums, and enclave forgery across 62 configurations. Under synthetic conditions, GBI-DCSE is a selective, policy-versioned, self-auditing test and routing substrate.
Related papers
- MemToC: Benchmarking Memory-Tool Conflict Resolution in Large Language Models [49.47300047353726]
We introduce MemToC, a benchmark for post-tool-return arbitration with executable tools.<n>MemToC comprises 6,504 evaluation episodes constructed from 542 quality-controlled factual questions.<n>Across five open-weight 7-9B models, tool returns strongly dominate elicited closed-book answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-26T18:22:03Z) - The Recall Trap: A Recall-Maximizing Retriever Configuration Reduces Issue Resolution in Fixed-Budget Code Context [45.88028371034407]
We report a controlled case study in code repair, not a new phenomenon.<n>We toggle one flag (one-chunk-perfile deduplication) on an otherwise identical stack.<n>We map where it holds: it reverses on a lexical BM25 (3.2pp, significant cross-paradigm interaction)<n>We show that at a tight fixed budget, do not hard-deduplicate by file, and A/B packing policies against the task, not the metric flag was tuned.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-14T19:22:50Z) - A Reproducibility Protocol for Cross-Implementation Evaluation of Post-Quantum ACVP Test Vectors [0.0]
This study defines a product-neutral protocol for three public implementations of NIST ML-KEM.<n> Protocol v2 freezes provider-specific capabilities, applies one validation-error symmetrically, preserves every selected case, and separates bytes, validation verdicts, unsupported operations, and adapter errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-13T21:29:59Z) - EduPluginBench: Executable Assurance for AI-Generated Educational Plugins [0.0]
We introduce negative provenance, an executable benchmark and staged admission method for generated plugins in software ecosystems.<n>A frozen transfer study of 600 unmodified generations from two current coding models found that 300/600 parsed, but none passed P0 or achieved P0-P4 conformance.<n>An earlier 540-generation diagnostic found that post-hoc bounded repair yielded 112 P0 passes, all nonconforming, with recall increasing from 13.4% to 100%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-01T16:22:35Z) - Looping Is Not Reliability: State-Bound Evidence and Typed Revision Contracts for Agentic Code Repair [36.56438114281786]
We study the gap between finding a correct patch and retaining, verifying, and submitting it.<n>We derive an evidence-bound typed loop contract and instantiate its mechanically enforceable subset in a reference implementation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-27T16:05:23Z) - DeFAb: A Verifiable Benchmark for Defeasible Abduction in Foundation Models [6.628401122676601]
A rule-based logic solver resolves every instance in our benchmark in under 50 microseconds with 100% accuracy.<n>We introduce DeFAb (Defeasible Abduction Benchmark), a dataset and generation pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T00:13:40Z) - Verifier-First Evaluation of Agentic LLMs for Infrastructure-as-Code Generation [0.0]
Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) generation from natural language requires satisfying provider schemas, dependency planning, and organizational policy constraints.<n>We present a verifier-first empirical study of seven agentic strategies for Terraform generation evaluated on IaC-Eval v2, a modernized 186-task AWS/Terraform benchmark with Rego v1 policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-29T12:43:27Z) - Distributional Energy-Based Models for Uncertainty-Aware Structured LLM Reasoning [40.342912574072024]
Large Language Models produce structured outputs such as travel plans or code solutions.<n>Individual reasoning steps may appear correct while the output as a whole violates budgets, fails test cases, or contradicts earlier deductions.<n>We propose a learned quality scorer with deterministic analytical constraint penalties for verifying structured LLM outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-15T17:08:27Z) - PBT-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Property-Based Testing [29.035258104995204]
We introduce PBT-Bench, a benchmark of 100 curated property-based testing problems across 40 real Python libraries.<n>Each problem injects one or more semantic bugs (365 in total, mean 3.65 per problem) designed so that default-strategy random inputs almost never trigger them.<n>Bug recall under the PBT-guided prompt ranges from 42.1% to 83.4% across models; under the open-ended baseline, from 31.4% to 76.7%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-13T18:01:05Z) - Adaptive Consensus in LLM Ensembles via Sequential Evidence Accumulation: Automatic Budget Identification and Calibrated Commit Signals [0.0]
DASE produces a commit-type routing partition that generalises across benchmarks.<n> Adaptive stopping, not injection bandwidth, drives accuracy.<n>Injection-based methods exhibit an inverted-U accuracy-vs-inference trajectory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-05T19:24:10Z) - Are Benchmark Tests Strong Enough? Mutation-Guided Diagnosis and Augmentation of Regression Suites [49.16055123488827]
Insufficiently strong test suites can admit plausible yet semantically incorrect patches, inflating reported success rates.<n>We introduce STING, a framework for targeted test augmentation that uses semantically altered program variants as diagnostic stressors.<n>STING produces 1,014 validated tests spanning 211 instances and increases patch-region line and branch coverage by 10.8% and 9.5%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T01:13:40Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.