Benchmarking Composable Compression Techniques in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21693v1
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:01:18 GMT
- Title: Benchmarking Composable Compression Techniques in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs
- Abstract summary: MoEXBench is a systematic benchmark for evaluating composable MoE compression as an end-to-end deployment workflow.<n>It measures composable-compression quality, workload and architecture, pruning/quantization/KV cache sensitivity, and deployment efficiency on commodity hardware.
- Score: 50.677556944160216
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) LLMs scale model capacity efficiently through sparse activation, but their large expert parameter footprint, routing imbalance, and long-context KV-cache growth make deployment difficult on commodity hardware. Practical deployment often requires stacking multiple compression techniques: expert pruning removes redundant experts, weight quantization lowers model memory footprint, and KV-cache compression reduces long-context memory pressure. However, these techniques are typically evaluated in isolation, leaving open how they interact when applied together in realistic deployment pipelines. In this work, we present MoEXBench, a systematic benchmark for evaluating composable MoE compression as an end-to-end deployment workflow. MoEXBench studies 10 MoE models ranging from 30B to 235B total parameters across standard-attention, hybrid linear-attention, and sliding window attention architectures. It evaluates 20%-50% expert pruning rates, 1 to 16 bit weight-quantization schemes, and multiple KV-cache precision settings, applied both individually and in combination. MoEXBench introduces an eight-module evaluation suite that jointly measures composable-compression quality, workload and architecture robustness, pruning/quantization/KV cache sensitivity, and deployment efficiency on commodity hardware. Our results reveal non-trivial interactions among compression methods: composable compression cannot be predicted from standalone techniques, compression rate alone does not reliably predict quality loss or runtime gain, expert pruning is the dominant degradation source, and average quality can hide workload and architecture-specific failures. By releasing normalized module scores, compressed artifacts, and reproducible scripts, MoEXBench enables practical accuracy-memory-latency comparison across MoE families and hardware backends.
Related papers
- Benchmarking KV-Cache Optimizations across Task Quality and System Performance for Long-Context Serving [3.3030145376284943]
This paper presents a workload-aware benchmark of representative KV-cache optimization mechanisms.<n>The benchmark measures task quality, mean output throughput, mean time-to-first-token, and realized compression ratio.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-03T11:50:41Z) - EchoKV: Efficient KV Cache Compression via Similarity-Based Reconstruction [55.026048429595384]
EchoKV is a flexible KV cache compression scheme that enables on-demand transitions between standard and compressed inference.<n>We introduce a two-stage fine-tuning strategy that allows for rapid, low-cost training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-24T07:58:42Z) - Arbitrary Ratio Feature Compression via Next Token Prediction [52.10426317889982]
Arbitrary Ratio Feature Compression (ARFC) framework supports any compression ratio with a single model.<n>ARC is an auto-regressive model that performs compression via next-gressive prediction.<n>MoS module refines the compressed tokens by utilizing multiple compression results.<n>ERGC is integrated into the training process to preserve semantic and structural relationships during compression.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T02:38:57Z) - MC#: Mixture Compressor for Mixture-of-Experts Large Models [86.64315380917827]
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) effectively scales large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) by increasing capacity through sparse activation.<n>We propose MC# (Mixture-Compressor-sharp), a framework that combines static quantization and dynamic expert pruning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T03:12:46Z) - LoRC: Low-Rank Compression for LLMs KV Cache with a Progressive Compression Strategy [59.1298692559785]
Key-Value ( KV) cache is crucial component in serving transformer-based autoregressive large language models (LLMs)
Existing approaches to mitigate this issue include: (1) efficient attention variants integrated in upcycling stages; (2) KV cache compression at test time; and (3) KV cache compression at test time.
We propose a low-rank approximation of KV weight matrices, allowing plug-in integration with existing transformer-based LLMs without model retraining.
Our method is designed to function without model tuning in upcycling stages or task-specific profiling in test stages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T03:10:53Z) - UNComp: Can Matrix Entropy Uncover Sparsity? -- A Compressor Design from an Uncertainty-Aware Perspective [85.08718140718707]
UNComp is an uncertainty-aware framework that uncovers sparsity patterns that can be used for adaptive compression.<n>By focusing on uncertainty to analyze the sparsity pattern in detail, UNComp reduces the KV cache size to 4.74% of the original, achieves a 6% prefill speedup, and improves throughput by 6.4x.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T02:32:36Z) - Towards Efficient Mixture of Experts: A Holistic Study of Compression Techniques [17.436189502801163]
We present a holistic study of compression techniques for Mixture of Experts to enhance both efficiency and scalability.<n>We propose Layer Drop, which removes entire MoE layers, and Block Drop, which eliminates transformer blocks.<n>We also introduce Expert Slimming, which compresses individual experts to further boost performance and can be seamlessly integrated with Expert Trimming.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T17:18:40Z) - The Cost of Compression: Investigating the Impact of Compression on
Parametric Knowledge in Language Models [11.156816338995503]
Large language models (LLMs) provide faster inference, smaller memory footprints, and enables local deployment.
Two standard compression techniques are pruning and quantization, with the former eliminating redundant connections in model layers and the latter representing model parameters with fewer bits.
Existing research on LLM compression primarily focuses on performance in terms of general metrics like perplexity or downstream task accuracy.
More fine-grained metrics, such as those measuring parametric knowledge, remain significantly underexplored.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-01T22:27:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.