The urban right to AI: Pluralistic co-design and governance of public space
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23999v1
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 02:43:20 GMT
- Title: The urban right to AI: Pluralistic co-design and governance of public space
- Abstract summary: This thesis asks what follows when scores, maps, and generated images become part of municipal decision-making.<n>Because public space is contested, this algorithmic layer cannot be governed through technical performance alone.<n>The thesis develops a civic Right to AI and a pluralistic approach to alignment in which differences in public values are made visible.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Cities are beginning to use AI not only to analyze public space, but also to define what counts as evidence about it. This thesis asks what follows when scores, maps, and generated images become part of municipal decision-making. I argue that contemporary urbanism operates through two coupled infrastructures: the material city and an epistemic, algorithmic layer that shapes what cities can perceive, compare, and act upon. Because public space is contested, this algorithmic layer cannot be governed through technical performance alone. The thesis develops a civic Right to AI and a pluralistic approach to alignment in which differences in public values are made visible rather than averaged into a single objective. Methodologically, the thesis moves between normative theory, participatory research, machine learning, and governance design. The empirical work is grounded in Montréal. Street Review combines participatory research with computer vision to examine how residents evaluate streets differently and how those judgments can be mapped at city scale using approximately 45,000 street-view images. LIVS (Local Intersectional Visual Spaces) extends the same problem to generative AI. Developed with 30 community organizations, it contains 37,710 pairwise comparisons across 13,462 images and is used to fine-tune and evaluate a Stable Diffusion XL model with Direct Preference Optimization. The results show that alignment can improve, but disagreement and neutrality persist. I treat these outcomes not as annotation noise, but as evidence that some values remain contested. The thesis concludes by translating these findings into municipal practice through lifecycle governance, procurement rules, oversight, recommissioning, and recourse. The resulting framework shows how cities can govern AI without treating plural values as measurement error or forcing them into a single objective.
Related papers
- UrbanGround: From Local Perception to Spatial Agency in a Real-Scale City [63.28750191463138]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can interpret a street view, but urban agency depends on whether such local evidence remains useful after the agent starts to move.<n>We investigate how far current MLLM agents can turn local urban perception into reliable action in a complicated real-scale city.<n>We propose UrbanGround, the first sandbox to make this question testable in a physically constrained replica of Hong Kong built from territory-wide 3D geospatial data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-27T17:59:33Z) - AI Pluralism and the Worlds It Misses [0.0]
The paper develops a bounded conceptual and qualitative synthesis across value pluralism, pluralistic alignment, participatory and democratic AI, justice, science and technology studies, accountability research, and three urban AI companion cases.<n>PLG is not presented as a validated scoring instrument; it is a framework for making the evidence and governance conditions of pluralistic AI explicit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-15T03:30:48Z) - Pluralistic-Alignment Urbanism: Operationalizing a Right to AI for Inclusive Public Space [0.0]
This paper proposes a procedural governance framework that treats public-space AI systems as civic infrastructure.<n>The paper examines how disagreement, subgroup variation, bounded predictive scaling, and neutral preference judgments can inform municipal AI governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-15T23:59:37Z) - Modeling Subjective Urban Perception with Human Gaze [60.73742038237224]
We introduce Place Pulse-Gaze, an urban perception dataset that augments street view images with synchronized eye-tracking recordings and individual perception labels.<n>We propose a Gaze-Guided Urban Perception Framework to study how gaze behavior contributes to the modeling of subjective urban perception.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-01T16:25:13Z) - Learning to Drive in New Cities Without Human Demonstrations [66.37858021482741]
We show that self-play multi-agent reinforcement learning can adapt a driving policy to a substantially different target city using only the map and meta-information.<n>We introduce NO data Map-based self-play for Autonomous Driving (NOMAD), which enables policy adaptation in a simulator constructed based on the target-city map.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-09T00:31:20Z) - UrbanVerse: Scaling Urban Simulation by Watching City-Tour Videos [64.22243628420799]
We introduce UrbanVerse, a data-driven real-to-sim system that converts crowd-sourced city-tour videos into physics-aware, interactive simulation scenes.<n>Running in IsaacSim, UrbanVerse offers 160 high-quality constructed scenes from 24 countries, along with a curated benchmark of 10 artist-designed test scenes.<n>Experiments show that UrbanVerse scenes preserve real-world semantics and layouts, achieving human-evaluated realism comparable to manually crafted scenes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T17:42:34Z) - Whose Truth? Pluralistic Geo-Alignment for (Agentic) AI [42.108524228070756]
What is considered appropriate, truthful, or legal can differ widely across regions due to cultural norms, political realities, and legislation.<n>This paper reviews key geographic research problems, suggests topics for future work, and outlines methods for assessing alignment sensitivity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-07T14:21:33Z) - CityX: Controllable Procedural Content Generation for Unbounded 3D Cities [50.10101235281943]
Current generative methods fall short in either diversity, controllability, or fidelity.<n>In this work, we resort to the procedural content generation (PCG) technique for high-fidelity generation.<n>We develop a multi-agent framework to transform multi-modal instructions, including OSM, semantic maps, and satellite images, into executable programs.<n>Our method, named CityX, demonstrates its superiority in creating diverse, controllable, and realistic 3D urban scenes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-24T18:05:13Z) - Understanding Place Identity with Generative AI [2.1441748927508506]
generative AI models have the potential to capture the collective image of cities that can make them distinguishable.
This study is among the first attempts to explore the capabilities of generative AI in understanding human perceptions of the built environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T02:32:45Z) - The Abduction of Sherlock Holmes: A Dataset for Visual Abductive
Reasoning [113.25016899663191]
Humans have remarkable capacity to reason abductively and hypothesize about what lies beyond the literal content of an image.
We present Sherlock, an annotated corpus of 103K images for testing machine capacity for abductive reasoning beyond literal image contents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-10T02:26:45Z) - The 5th AI City Challenge [51.83023045451549]
The fifth AI City Challenge attracted 305 participating teams across 38 countries.
The evaluation was conducted on both algorithmic effectiveness and computational efficiency.
Results show the promise of AI in Smarter Transportation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-25T19:15:27Z) - Urban2Vec: Incorporating Street View Imagery and POIs for Multi-Modal
Urban Neighborhood Embedding [8.396746290518102]
Urban2Vec is an unsupervised multi-modal framework which incorporates both street view imagery and point-of-interest data.
We show that Urban2Vec can achieve performances better than baseline models and comparable to fully-supervised methods in downstream prediction tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-29T21:30:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.