Apples to Apples? Towards Comparable Crosslingual Language Model Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25089v2
• Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:53:47 GMT
• Title: Apples to Apples? Towards Comparable Crosslingual Language Model Evaluation
• Abstract summary: We examine crosslingual evaluation approaches using controlled monolingual language models trained on parallel data.<n>Our results show that several widely used normalized metrics introduce crosslinguistic biases rooted in tokenization, encoding, and orthographic differences.<n>In contrast, sentence-level negative log-likelihood computed over semantically equivalent sequences provides more meaningful and consistent crosslingual comparisons.
• Score: 4.651750987298774
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Crosslingual evaluation of language models that enables fair comparisons remains a fundamental challenge in multilingual NLP. Existing studies adopt a variety of downstream tasks and intrinsic metrics with different theoretical justifications, yet there has been little empirical investigation into whether these approaches yield meaningful crosslingual conclusions. We systematically examine crosslingual evaluation approaches using controlled monolingual language models trained on parallel data with varying tokenizer vocabulary sizes and model sizes, and further validate our findings on multilingual LLMs. We further discuss challenges in achieving comparable downstream evaluation across languages. Our results show that several widely used normalized metrics introduce crosslinguistic biases rooted in tokenization, encoding, and orthographic differences. In contrast, sentence-level negative log-likelihood computed over semantically equivalent sequences provides more meaningful and consistent crosslingual comparisons.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Concept-Spilling Across Languages in LLMs [7.577675422356702]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable cross-lingual abilities, yet often exhibit a systematic bias toward representations from other languages.<n>This paper presents a novel comparative framework for evaluating multilingual semantic robustness by measuring how models handle polysemous words across languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T19:28:26Z)
• Are Knowledge and Reference in Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingually Consistent? [29.155049176669916]
  Cross-lingual consistency should be considered to assess cross-lingual transferability.<n>Code-switching training and cross-lingual word alignment objectives show the most promising results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T06:55:15Z)
• Cross-Lingual Pitfalls: Automatic Probing Cross-Lingual Weakness of Multilingual Large Language Models [55.14276067678253]
  This paper introduces a novel methodology for efficiently identifying inherent cross-lingual weaknesses in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We construct a new dataset of over 6,000 bilingual pairs across 16 languages using this methodology, demonstrating its effectiveness in revealing weaknesses even in state-of-the-art models.<n>Further experiments investigate the relationship between linguistic similarity and cross-lingual weaknesses, revealing that linguistically related languages share similar performance patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T12:31:27Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Language Confusion in LLMs [76.96033035093204]
  We evaluate 15 typologically diverse languages with existing and newly-created English and multilingual prompts.<n>We find that Llama Instruct and Mistral models exhibit high degrees of language confusion.<n>We find that language confusion can be partially mitigated via few-shot prompting, multilingual SFT and preference tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T17:03:51Z)
• Improving Multi-lingual Alignment Through Soft Contrastive Learning [9.454626745893798]
  We propose a novel method to align multi-lingual embeddings based on the similarity of sentences measured by a pre-trained mono-lingual embedding model. Given translation sentence pairs, we train a multi-lingual model in a way that the similarity between cross-lingual embeddings follows the similarity of sentences measured at the mono-lingual teacher model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T09:46:07Z)
• Multilingual Representation Distillation with Contrastive Learning [20.715534360712425]
  We integrate contrastive learning into multilingual representation distillation and use it for quality estimation of parallel sentences. We validate our approach with multilingual similarity search and corpus filtering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-10T22:27:04Z)
• Discovering Representation Sprachbund For Multilingual Pre-Training [139.05668687865688]
  We generate language representation from multilingual pre-trained models and conduct linguistic analysis. We cluster all the target languages into multiple groups and name each group as a representation sprachbund. Experiments are conducted on cross-lingual benchmarks and significant improvements are achieved compared to strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T09:32:06Z)
• AM2iCo: Evaluating Word Meaning in Context across Low-ResourceLanguages with Adversarial Examples [51.048234591165155]
  We present AM2iCo, Adversarial and Multilingual Meaning in Context. It aims to faithfully assess the ability of state-of-the-art (SotA) representation models to understand the identity of word meaning in cross-lingual contexts. Results reveal that current SotA pretrained encoders substantially lag behind human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T20:23:45Z)
• XL-WiC: A Multilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Semantic Contextualization [98.61159823343036]
  We present the Word-in-Context dataset (WiC) for assessing the ability to correctly model distinct meanings of a word. We put forward a large multilingual benchmark, XL-WiC, featuring gold standards in 12 new languages. Experimental results show that even when no tagged instances are available for a target language, models trained solely on the English data can attain competitive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T15:32:00Z)
• Detecting Fine-Grained Cross-Lingual Semantic Divergences without Supervision by Learning to Rank [28.910206570036593]
  This work improves the prediction and annotation of fine-grained semantic divergences. We introduce a training strategy for multilingual BERT models by learning to rank synthetic divergent examples of varying granularity. Learning to rank helps detect fine-grained sentence-level divergences more accurately than a strong sentence-level similarity model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T21:26:20Z)
• XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalization [128.37244072182506]
  Cross-lingual TRansfer Evaluation of Multilinguals XTREME is a benchmark for evaluating the cross-lingual generalization capabilities of multilingual representations across 40 languages and 9 tasks. We demonstrate that while models tested on English reach human performance on many tasks, there is still a sizable gap in the performance of cross-lingually transferred models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-24T19:09:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.