When Does Context Routing Help? A Systematic Study of Multi-Modal Fusion in Time Series Forecasting
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25128v1
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 20:25:49 GMT
- Title: When Does Context Routing Help? A Systematic Study of Multi-Modal Fusion in Time Series Forecasting
- Abstract summary: Multi-modal time series forecasting methods integrate auxiliary context into temporal predictions through increasingly sophisticated fusion mechanisms.<n>We ask a narrower, checkable question: when can auxiliary context help a forecaster at all?<n>We identify two dataset-level conditions that must both hold: (1) the target is not dominated by a last-value shortcut (low autocorrelation rho_h), and (2) the context carries information about the target beyond history.
- Score: 10.826557947047933
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Multi-modal time series forecasting methods integrate auxiliary context into temporal predictions through increasingly sophisticated fusion mechanisms. A growing body of work reports substantial gains, yet it is often unclear whether they reflect genuine use of the context or incidental architectural effects. We ask a narrower, checkable question: when can auxiliary context help a forecaster at all? We identify two dataset-level conditions that must both hold: (1) the target is not dominated by a last-value shortcut (low autocorrelation rho_h), and (2) the context carries information about the target beyond history (non-zero conditional mutual information delta; when delta=0 no predictor can benefit---a distribution-free result). Through controlled experiments on MoME (a 14.3B-parameter mixture-of-experts model, 6 datasets, 10 seeds) and four additional fusion mechanisms implemented within a single-backbone testbed (5 datasets), we find that when both conditions hold, text-conditioned expert modulation contributes a sizeable MSE reduction; when either fails, the contribution collapses to the capacity floor of the modulation pathway and carries no context-attributable signal. We establish causality through two interventions: adding a shortcut to MoME suppresses routing contribution by 77-93% across 3 datasets; progressively corrupting context quality drives the context-specific benefit from +44% to negative. We validate the autocorrelation component of our diagnostic on 27 Monash Archive datasets. We provide a calibrated pre-training diagnostic that, on the datasets we test, yields no false positives in well-powered settings. We are explicit about the asymmetry of our evidence: the negative arm is broadly reliable, while the large positive magnitudes come from a single model family (MoME) and are corroborated only in direction by the testbed.
Related papers
- Anomaly Detection and Root Cause Analysis for Microservice Systems [0.0]
Microservice systems are widely used to build cloud applications, yet their complexity makes failures inevitable.<n>This thesis advances automated anomaly detection and root cause analysis for microservice failures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-08T00:50:43Z) - Tree-of-Evidence: Efficient "System 2" Search for Faithful Multimodal Grounding [1.6365003324232734]
We introduce Tree-of-Evidence (ToE), an inference-time search algorithm that frames interpretability as a discrete optimization problem.<n>ToE employs lightweight Evidence Bottlenecks that score coarse groups or units of data and performs a beam search to identify the compact evidence set required to reproduce the model's prediction.<n>Under sparse evidence budgets, ToE achieves higher decision agreement and lower probability fidelity error than other approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T01:28:14Z) - DecepGPT: Schema-Driven Deception Detection with Multicultural Datasets and Robust Multimodal Learning [64.33887406863899]
Multimodal deception detection aims to identify deceptive behavior by analyzing audiovisual cues for forensics and security.<n>Existing benchmarks provide only binary labels without intermediate reasoning cues.<n>We construct reasoning datasets with structured cue-level descriptions and reasoning chains.<n>With 1695 samples, it is the largest non-laboratory deception detection dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-25T04:06:36Z) - Revisiting Multivariate Time Series Forecasting with Missing Values [65.30332997607141]
Missing values are common in real-world time series.<n>Current approaches have developed an imputation-then-prediction framework that uses imputation modules to fill in missing values, followed by forecasting on the imputed data.<n>This framework overlooks a critical issue: there is no ground truth for the missing values, making the imputation process susceptible to errors that can degrade prediction accuracy.<n>We introduce Consistency-Regularized Information Bottleneck (CRIB), a novel framework built on the Information Bottleneck principle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-27T20:57:48Z) - From Harm to Help: Turning Reasoning In-Context Demos into Assets for Reasoning LMs [58.02809208460186]
We revisit this paradox using high-quality traces from DeepSeek-R1 as demonstrations.<n>We find that adding more exemplars consistently degrades accuracy, even when demonstrations are optimal.<n>We introduce Insight-to-solve (I2S), a sequential test-time procedure that turns demonstrations into explicit, reusable insights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-27T08:59:31Z) - Towards Agents That Know When They Don't Know: Uncertainty as a Control Signal for Structured Reasoning [19.099363114326355]
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in structured biomedical data environments.<n>We introduce an uncertainty-aware agent for query-conditioned multi-table summarization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-02T15:12:10Z) - When Does Multimodality Lead to Better Time Series Forecasting? [96.26052272121615]
We investigate whether and under what conditions such multimodal integration consistently yields gains.<n>Our findings reveal that the benefits of multimodality are highly condition-dependent.<n>Our study offers a rigorous, quantitative foundation for understanding when multimodality can be expected to aid forecasting tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-20T23:55:56Z) - Conservative Prediction via Data-Driven Confidence Minimization [70.93946578046003]
In safety-critical applications of machine learning, it is often desirable for a model to be conservative.
We propose the Data-Driven Confidence Minimization framework, which minimizes confidence on an uncertainty dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T07:05:36Z) - Inertial Hallucinations -- When Wearable Inertial Devices Start Seeing
Things [82.15959827765325]
We propose a novel approach to multimodal sensor fusion for Ambient Assisted Living (AAL)
We address two major shortcomings of standard multimodal approaches, limited area coverage and reduced reliability.
Our new framework fuses the concept of modality hallucination with triplet learning to train a model with different modalities to handle missing sensors at inference time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-14T10:04:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.