ReliableRAG: Combating Misinformation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Reliability-Guided Reasoning Chains

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25487v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 07:59:24 GMT
• Title: ReliableRAG: Combating Misinformation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Reliability-Guided Reasoning Chains
• Abstract summary: False, inaccurate, and misleading information in news and social media poses a serious challenge to real-world Question Answering systems.<n>We propose ReliableRAG, which mitigates deceptive misinformation in multi-hop QA through fine-grained evaluation of individual triples.<n> ReliableRAG autoregressively constructs robust reasoning chains to consolidate trustworthy evidence and filter deceptive misinformation.
• Score: 13.376372865194627
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful architecture for Question Answering (QA) by integrating external information into Large Language Models (LLMs). However, false, inaccurate, and misleading information in news and social media poses a serious challenge to real-world RAG systems, especially in multi-hop QA, where complex multi-step reasoning can be misled by even a single deceptive misinformation segment in the retrieved documents. Existing approaches mainly rely on implicit alignment or explicit regulation, but their limited ability to assess fine-grained information reliability makes them vulnerable to deceptive misinformation that is semantically relevant to the question yet factually incorrect, leading to erroneous answers. To address this limitation, we propose ReliableRAG, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first reliability-driven framework that mitigates deceptive misinformation in multi-hop QA through fine-grained evaluation of individual triples. ReliableRAG first extracts information segments from source documents and represents them as structured triples. It then quantifies triple reliability by combining query-triple semantic relevance with triple credibility, retaining only the top-$K$ reliable and non-redundant triples. Based on these refined triples, ReliableRAG autoregressively constructs robust reasoning chains to consolidate trustworthy evidence and filter deceptive misinformation, producing accurate answers faithful to reliable information. Experiments on three multi-hop QA datasets show that ReliableRAG outperforms existing methods, substantially improving the factual reliability and robustness of RAG systems under deceptive misinformation injection.

Related papers

• Schema-Aware Planning and Hybrid Knowledge Toolset for Reliable Knowledge Graph Triple Verification [31.263531484583805]
  Knowledge Graphs (KGs) serve as a critical foundation for AI systems, yet their automated construction inevitably introduces noise, compromising data trustworthiness.<n>Existing triple verification methods, based on graph embeddings or language models, often suffer from single-source bias by relying on either internal structural constraints or external semantic evidence.<n>We propose SHARP, a training-free autonomous agent that reformulates triple verification as a process of strategic planning, active investigation, and evidential reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-05T17:10:18Z)
• InfoGatherer: Principled Information Seeking via Evidence Retrieval and Strategic Questioning [50.375547542738055]
  InfoGatherer is a framework that gathers missing information from two complementary sources without collapsing to a definitive answer.<n> InfoGatherer outperforms strong baselines while requiring fewer turns across legal and medical tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T04:55:03Z)
• ERA: Evidence-based Reliability Alignment for Honest Retrieval-Augmented Generation [19.616905640490252]
  We propose a new framework called ERA (Evidence-based Reliability Alignment) to enhance abstention behavior in RAG systems.<n>Our approach significantly outperforms baselines, optimizing the trade-off between answer coverage and abstention with superior calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T01:45:51Z)
• Epistemic Context Learning: Building Trust the Right Way in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems [94.9141394384021]
  Individual agents in multi-agent systems often lack robustness, tending to blindly conform to misleading peers.<n>We show this weakness stems from both sycophancy and inadequate ability to evaluate peer reliability.<n>We first formalize the learning problem of history-aware reference, introducing the historical interactions of peers as additional input.<n>We then develop Epistemic Context Learning (ECL), a reasoning framework that conditions predictions on explicitly-built peer profiles from history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T13:59:32Z)
• ReFIne: A Framework for Trustworthy Large Reasoning Models with Reliability, Faithfulness, and Interpretability [23.70973331911138]
  We argue that usable reasoning systems must be trustworthy, characterized by three properties: interpretability, faithfulness, and reliability.<n>We propose ReFIne, a new training framework that integrates supervised fine-tuning with GRPO to encourage models to improve interpretability.<n>Our experimental results show that ReFIne models generate clearer and better-structured reasoning traces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T07:08:44Z)
• ReliabilityRAG: Effective and Provably Robust Defense for RAG-based Web-Search [69.60882125603133]
  We present ReliabilityRAG, a framework for adversarial robustness that explicitly leverages reliability information of retrieved documents.<n>Our work is a significant step towards more effective, provably robust defenses against retrieved corpus corruption in RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T22:36:42Z)
• Rethinking All Evidence: Enhancing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Conflict-Driven Summarization [11.875601079871865]
  We propose CARE-RAG (Conflict-Aware and Reliable Evidence for RAG), a novel framework that improves trustworthiness through Conflict-Driven Summarization of all available evidence.<n>To detect and summarize conflicts, we distill a 3B LLaMA3.2 model to perform conflict-driven summarization, enabling reliable synthesis across multiple sources.<n>Experiments on revised QA datasets with retrieval data show that CARE-RAG consistently outperforms strong RAG baselines, especially in scenarios with noisy or conflicting evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T01:39:49Z)
• Divide-Then-Align: Honest Alignment based on the Knowledge Boundary of RAG [51.120170062795566]
  We propose Divide-Then-Align (DTA) to endow RAG systems with the ability to respond with "I don't know" when the query is out of the knowledge boundary.<n>DTA balances accuracy with appropriate abstention, enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of retrieval-augmented systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T08:21:21Z)
• Know3-RAG: A Knowledge-aware RAG Framework with Adaptive Retrieval, Generation, and Filtering [9.814926166669366]
  We propose Know3-RAG, a knowledge-aware RAG framework that leverages structured knowledge from knowledge graphs (KGs) to guide three core stages of the RAG process, including retrieval, generation, and filtering.<n> Experiments on multiple open-domain QA benchmarks demonstrate that Know3-RAG consistently outperforms strong baselines, significantly reducing hallucinations and enhancing answer reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T03:25:18Z)
• Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG Reasoning through Test-Time Critique and Optimization [58.390885294401066]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>We propose AlignRAG, a novel iterative framework grounded in Critique-Driven Alignment (CDA)<n>We introduce AlignRAG-auto, an autonomous variant that dynamically terminates refinement, removing the need to pre-specify the number of critique iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Conflicting Evidence [57.66282463340297]
  Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly employing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to improve the factuality of their responses.<n>In practice, these systems often need to handle ambiguous user queries and potentially conflicting information from multiple sources.<n>We propose RAMDocs (Retrieval with Ambiguity and Misinformation in Documents), a new dataset that simulates complex and realistic scenarios for conflicting evidence for a user query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T16:46:11Z)
• ParamMute: Suppressing Knowledge-Critical FFNs for Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation [91.20492150248106]
  We investigate the internal mechanisms behind unfaithful generation and identify a subset of mid-to-deep feed-forward networks (FFNs) that are disproportionately activated in such cases.<n>We propose Parametric Knowledge Muting through FFN Suppression (ParamMute), a framework that improves contextual faithfulness by suppressing the activation of unfaithfulness-associated FFNs.<n> Experimental results show that ParamMute significantly enhances faithfulness across both CoFaithfulQA and the established ConFiQA benchmark, achieving substantial reductions in reliance on parametric memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T15:50:41Z)
• TrustRAG: Enhancing Robustness and Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [31.231916859341865]
  TrustRAG is a framework that systematically filters malicious and irrelevant content before it is retrieved for generation.<n>TrustRAG delivers substantial improvements in retrieval accuracy, efficiency, and attack resistance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-01T15:57:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.