V-Rubrics: Visual Faithfulness via Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25580v1
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:40:46 GMT
- Title: V-Rubrics: Visual Faithfulness via Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning
- Abstract summary: Vision-sampling models can produce fluent answers that are insufficiently grounded in the visual evidence.<n>We introduce Visuals-Based Reinforcement Learning, which decomposes reference responses into atomic propositions.<n>We train our model based on the same SFT checkpoint using component-wise, prefix-localized rubric credit.
- Score: 59.47823383593251
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Vision-language models can produce fluent answers that are insufficiently grounded in the visual evidence: a single unsupported object, chart value, or intermediate inference can undermine an otherwise plausible response. We argue that this is a credit-assignment failure in multimodal post-training. Scalar outcome rewards indicate whether an answer is acceptable, but do not identify which visual facts are grounded, which reasoning steps are valid, or which instruction constraints are missed. We introduce Visual Rubrics-Based Reinforcement Learning, which decomposes reference responses into atomic propositions and scores generated answers along Visual Faithfulness (VF), Reasoning Consistency (RC), and Instruction Following (IF). The resulting rubric items provide structured partial credit and localize rubric credit when supporting evidence spans are available. We first obtain an SFT checkpoint by fine-tuning Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct on the public OpenMMReasoner-SFT-874K corpus, adapting OpenMMReasoner's cold-start data recipe. We construct V-Rubrics 50K, a 50,248-example training set from 17 visually grounded sources, by applying rule-based filters before deriving example difficulty from rejection-sampling scores and then annotating every example with Gemini-3-Pro under the same structured prompt and protocol. We train our model based on the same SFT checkpoint using component-wise, prefix-localized rubric credit. Experiments show that our rubricbased GRPO improves over both the shared SFT baseline and answer-only GRPO, with the largest gains on knowledge-oriented and visually grounded reasoning benchmarks. The results show rubrics as a useful reward abstraction for visual post-training.
Related papers
- Rethinking Reward Supervision: Rubric-Conditioned Self-Distillation [60.55792673956761]
We propose textbfRubric-Conditioned Self-Distillation, a framework that incorporates rubrics as structured, fine-grained feedback for on-policy self-distillation.<n>We evaluate on a diverse suite of science reasoning benchmarks and results show that rubric-conditioned self-distillation effectively converts rubric-level criteria into token-level guidance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T17:54:04Z) - QUBRIC: Co-Designing Queries and Rubrics for RL Beyond Verifiable Rewards [68.15832368034815]
We present a framework that co-designs queries and rubrics.<n>QUBRIC achieves a +5.5 point gain on ArenaHard over the SFT baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-02T17:53:04Z) - From Verifiable Dot to Reward Chain: Harnessing Verifiable Reference-based Rewards for Reinforcement Learning of Open-ended Generation [52.62655622099456]
We propose reinforcement learning with verifiable reference-based rewards (RLVRR)<n>Instead of checking the final answer, RLVRR extracts an ordered linguistic signal from high-quality references (i.e., reward chain)<n>In this way, RLVRR decomposes rewards into two dimensions: content, which preserves deterministic core concepts, and style, which evaluates adherence to stylistic properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-26T14:39:58Z) - Look As You Think: Unifying Reasoning and Visual Evidence Attribution for Verifiable Document RAG via Reinforcement Learning [55.232400251303794]
Look As You Think (LAT) is a reinforcement learning framework that trains models to produce verifiable reasoning paths with consistent attribution.<n>LAT consistently improves the vanilla model in both single- and multi-image settings, yielding average gains of 8.23% in soft exact match (EM) and 47.0% in IoU@0.5.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-15T02:50:23Z) - Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Prompting and Reinforcement Learning [0.42855555838080844]
This study investigates the spatial reasoning capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs) through Chain-of-Thought prompting and reinforcement learning.<n>We find that simple CoT formats, where the model generates a reasoning step before the answer, can harm the model's original performance.<n>In contrast, structured multi-stage prompting based on scene graphs (SceneGraph CoT) significantly improves spatial reasoning accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-06T10:51:12Z) - SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for
Generative Large Language Models [55.60306377044225]
"SelfCheckGPT" is a simple sampling-based approach to fact-check the responses of black-box models.
We investigate this approach by using GPT-3 to generate passages about individuals from the WikiBio dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-15T19:31:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.