Skill Issue: Are Skills Language-Invariant in LLMs?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25832v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 14:12:29 GMT
• Title: Skill Issue: Are Skills Language-Invariant in LLMs?
• Abstract summary: Large language models access knowledge inconsistently across languages, but to what extent do they differ in their skill sets when interacting with different languages?<n>This work quantifies cross-lingual skill inconsistencyly from knowledge and general benchmark performance.<n>We build a multilingual extension to TextArena and evaluate three open-weight models across eight languages and six games covering spatial reasoning, imperfect information, resource allocation, and repeated interaction.
• Score: 31.061737447193988
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models access knowledge inconsistently across languages, but to what extent do they differ in their skill sets when interacting with different languages? This work quantifies cross-lingual skill inconsistency orthogonally from knowledge and general benchmark performance. We do this via multilingual self-play: two instances of the same model compete in a text-based game, each interacting through a different language interface. Since the model, opponent, rules, state space, and available actions remain fixed, this setting isolates the effect of language on the model's realized behavior. We build a multilingual extension to TextArena and evaluate three open-weight models across eight languages and six games covering spatial reasoning, imperfect information, resource allocation, and repeated interaction. We find that the same model can exhibit markedly different playing strength across languages, with systematic variation in win--loss margins, invalid actions, and strategic tendencies. Detailed analyses reveal language-specific failures in spatial reasoning, card-conditioned decisions, and optimal move selection. In some settings, changing only the intermediate reasoning language recovers much of the lost performance, suggesting that language can affect different stages of the decision process. These results show that skill discrepancies are a measurable major roadblock in the development of truly multilingual models. Better understanding these discrepancies can help us design models that perform more equitably across languages.

Related papers

• Building Multilingual Bridges: Data Mixing as the Pillar of Generalization for In-Language Reasoning [75.46846056993418]
  Reasoning language models primarily reason in English regardless of the language they are prompted in.<n>This is inaccessible for non-English-speaking users, risks losing the intent of the original question, and forgoes knowledge more readily expressed in the target language.<n>In this work, we advance L2 reasoning, the ability of a model to reason consistently in the language of the user's prompt, thus building an in-language bridge between the prompt and the answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T16:56:25Z)
• Language Steering for Multilingual In-Context Learning [10.932074928744568]
  Large language models' performance on non-English languages remains substantially inferior to English.<n>We propose language vectors -- a training-free language steering approach.<n>We show consistent improvements on multilingual in-context learning over baselines across all tasks and languages tested.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T16:52:09Z)
• False Friends Are Not Foes: Investigating Vocabulary Overlap in Multilingual Language Models [53.01170039144264]
  Subword tokenizers trained on multilingual corpora naturally produce overlapping tokens across languages.<n>Does token overlap facilitate cross-lingual transfer or instead introduce interference between languages?<n>We find that models with overlap outperform models with disjoint vocabularies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T07:47:54Z)
• Language Matters: How Do Multilingual Input and Reasoning Paths Affect Large Reasoning Models? [59.970391602080205]
  Despite multilingual training, LRMs tend to default to reasoning in high-resource languages at test time.<n>Cultural reasoning degrades performance on reasoning tasks but benefits cultural tasks, while safety evaluations exhibit language-specific behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T02:46:18Z)
• Language Specific Knowledge: Do Models Know Better in X than in English? [9.923619418000488]
  Code-switching is a common phenomenon of alternating between different languages in the same utterance, thought, or conversation.<n>We coin the term Language Specific Knowledge (LSK) to represent this phenomenon.<n>We find that language models can perform better when using chain-of-thought reasoning in some languages other than English.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T00:31:13Z)
• Large Language Models Share Representations of Latent Grammatical Concepts Across Typologically Diverse Languages [15.203789021094982]
  In large language models (LLMs), how are multiple languages learned and encoded?<n>We train sparse autoencoders on Llama-3-8B and Aya-23-8B, and demonstrate that abstract grammatical concepts are often encoded in feature directions shared across many languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T21:18:21Z)
• Could We Have Had Better Multilingual LLMs If English Was Not the Central Language? [4.655168524016426]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong machine translation capabilities on languages they are trained on. Our study delves into Llama2's translation capabilities. Our experiments show that the 7B Llama2 model yields above 10 BLEU when translating into all languages it has seen.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T16:32:38Z)
• The Less the Merrier? Investigating Language Representation in Multilingual Models [8.632506864465501]
  We investigate the linguistic representation of different languages in multilingual models. We observe from our experiments that community-centered models perform better at distinguishing between languages in the same family for low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T02:26:34Z)
• Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languages [98.92630681729518]
  We show how disparity in the treatment of different languages arises at the tokenization stage, well before a model is even invoked. Character-level and byte-level models also exhibit over 4 times the difference in the encoding length for some language pairs. We make the case that we should train future language models using multilingually fair subword tokenizers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T14:17:57Z)
• Cross-Lingual Ability of Multilingual Masked Language Models: A Study of Language Structure [54.01613740115601]
  We study three language properties: constituent order, composition and word co-occurrence. Our main conclusion is that the contribution of constituent order and word co-occurrence is limited, while the composition is more crucial to the success of cross-linguistic transfer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T07:09:35Z)
• Discovering Representation Sprachbund For Multilingual Pre-Training [139.05668687865688]
  We generate language representation from multilingual pre-trained models and conduct linguistic analysis. We cluster all the target languages into multiple groups and name each group as a representation sprachbund. Experiments are conducted on cross-lingual benchmarks and significant improvements are achieved compared to strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T09:32:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.