Controlling for Omitted Variable Bias in Deep Neural Networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25930v1
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 15:42:12 GMT
- Title: Controlling for Omitted Variable Bias in Deep Neural Networks
- Abstract summary: Control variables are widely used in statistical modelling to account for omitted variable bias of known confounders.<n>They have largely been underexplored in deep learning.<n>We propose a control variable approach for deep learning models.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Control variables are widely used in statistical modelling to account for omitted variable bias of known confounders. However, they have largely been underexplored in deep learning. This is surprising, given that deep learning models encode image-inferable covariates, such as demographic variables, into their predictions when these covariates are correlated with the outcome---a form of omitted variable bias referred to as 'shortcut learning'. While many existing confound-control or fairness methods try to restrict the correlation of such covariates with model predictions, we show that this fails to correct for omitted variable bias. We therefore propose a control variable approach for deep learning models, based on generalised additive modelling of the effects of model inputs and covariates. As flexible additive models can suffer from concurvity, we introduce an estimation procedure that refits the final layer of a pre-trained network to include covariate effects, using cross-fitting with ridge penalisation. We show how these effects can be orthogonalised with respect to covariates to exclude their mediated effects and that model predictions can be marginalised over the covariate distribution to control for their effect. This yields unbiased, interpretable predictions and offers flexibility to model the desired effects depending on the scientific or fairness objective. We verify our approach using simulated images, and demonstrate consistent estimation of true effects. Existing methods either require more data or fail to recover the true effects. We apply our method to real neuroimaging data with experimentally induced confounding, where it recovers prediction performance to near the level of a model trained on unconfounded data. Code is available at https://github.com/mpff/cocodeel.
Related papers
- Debiasing Reward Models by Representation Learning with Guarantees [20.170532007501883]
We propose a principled framework that mitigates spurious correlation issues in reward models.<n>We show that non-spurious latent variables can be theoretically identified from data, regardless of whether a surrogate for the spurious latent variables is available.<n>Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that our method effectively mitigates spurious correlation issues and yields more robust reward models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-27T18:37:57Z) - Nonparametric Data Attribution for Diffusion Models [57.820618036556084]
Data attribution for generative models seeks to quantify the influence of individual training examples on model outputs.<n>We propose a nonparametric attribution method that operates entirely on data, measuring influence via patch-level similarity between generated and training images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T03:37:16Z) - Improving Group Robustness on Spurious Correlation via Evidential Alignment [26.544938760265136]
Deep neural networks often learn and rely on spurious correlations, i.e., superficial associations between non-causal features and the targets.<n>Existing methods typically mitigate this issue by using external group annotations or auxiliary deterministic models.<n>We propose Evidential Alignment, a novel framework that leverages uncertainty quantification to understand the behavior of the biased models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-12T22:47:21Z) - NeuronTune: Towards Self-Guided Spurious Bias Mitigation [26.544938760265136]
Deep neural networks often develop spurious bias, reliance on correlations between non-essential features and classes for predictions.<n>Existing mitigation approaches typically depend on external annotations of spurious correlations.<n>We propose NeuronTune, a post hoc method that directly intervenes in a model's internal decision process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T22:33:00Z) - Data Attribution for Diffusion Models: Timestep-induced Bias in Influence Estimation [53.27596811146316]
Diffusion models operate over a sequence of timesteps instead of instantaneous input-output relationships in previous contexts.
We present Diffusion-TracIn that incorporates this temporal dynamics and observe that samples' loss gradient norms are highly dependent on timestep.
We introduce Diffusion-ReTrac as a re-normalized adaptation that enables the retrieval of training samples more targeted to the test sample of interest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-17T07:58:18Z) - Linked shrinkage to improve estimation of interaction effects in
regression models [0.0]
We develop an estimator that adapts well to two-way interaction terms in a regression model.
We evaluate the potential of the model for inference, which is notoriously hard for selection strategies.
Our models can be very competitive to a more advanced machine learner, like random forest, even for fairly large sample sizes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-25T10:03:39Z) - Stubborn Lexical Bias in Data and Models [50.79738900885665]
We use a new statistical method to examine whether spurious patterns in data appear in models trained on the data.
We apply an optimization approach to *reweight* the training data, reducing thousands of spurious correlations.
Surprisingly, though this method can successfully reduce lexical biases in the training data, we still find strong evidence of corresponding bias in the trained models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-03T20:12:27Z) - Undersmoothing Causal Estimators with Generative Trees [0.0]
Inferring individualised treatment effects from observational data can unlock the potential for targeted interventions.
It is, however, hard to infer these effects from observational data.
In this paper, we explore a novel generative tree based approach that tackles model misspecification directly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-16T11:59:38Z) - X-model: Improving Data Efficiency in Deep Learning with A Minimax Model [78.55482897452417]
We aim at improving data efficiency for both classification and regression setups in deep learning.
To take the power of both worlds, we propose a novel X-model.
X-model plays a minimax game between the feature extractor and task-specific heads.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-09T13:56:48Z) - Contextual Dropout: An Efficient Sample-Dependent Dropout Module [60.63525456640462]
Dropout has been demonstrated as a simple and effective module to regularize the training process of deep neural networks.
We propose contextual dropout with an efficient structural design as a simple and scalable sample-dependent dropout module.
Our experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms baseline methods in terms of both accuracy and quality of uncertainty estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-06T19:30:32Z) - Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under
Covariate Shift [81.74795324629712]
We call prediction-time batch normalization, which significantly improves model accuracy and calibration under covariate shift.
We show that prediction-time batch normalization provides complementary benefits to existing state-of-the-art approaches for improving robustness.
The method has mixed results when used alongside pre-training, and does not seem to perform as well under more natural types of dataset shift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-19T05:08:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.