What Makes Agent Memory Useful for Reliable Unanswerable Question Handling?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27924v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 05:00:28 GMT
• Title: What Makes Agent Memory Useful for Reliable Unanswerable Question Handling?
• Abstract summary: Memory is widely used in agent systems, but its role in reliable UAQ handling remains unclear.<n>We present a systematic study of agent memory for UAQ handling under a unified agentic RAG framework.<n>We find that memory can improve UAQ performance in some settings, but such gains are selective rather than universal and remain fragile under dataset shift.
• Score: 51.58639607746329
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Reliable handling of unanswerable questions (UAQs) is critical for trustworthy LLM-based agents. Although memory is widely used in agent systems, its role in reliable UAQ handling remains unclear. We present a systematic study of agent memory for UAQ handling under a unified agentic RAG framework, evaluating four representative memory methods across three UAQ-related datasets and two base models. We find that memory can improve UAQ performance in some settings, but such gains are selective rather than universal and remain fragile under dataset shift. Interestingly, cross-model memory reuse is often more feasible than cross-dataset transfer, suggesting that shifts in answerability patterns pose a greater challenge to memory reuse than changes in the base model itself. We further find that UAQ gains are more strongly preserved through decision guidance than through trajectory shaping, and that memory effectiveness depends strongly on representation. In particular, procedural and rule-based memories often provide the most reliable support for UAQ handling, while memory composition is most effective when procedural guidance is combined with complementary behavioral signals. Overall, our findings suggest that reliable UAQ memory depends less on storing larger amounts of experience and more on preserving transferable behavioral guidance.

Related papers

• Is One Score Enough? Rethinking the Evaluation of Sequentially Evolving LLM Memory [50.857546269660276]
  We introduce SeqMem-Eval, a diagnostic evaluation framework for sequentially evolving large language models (LLMs) memory.<n>Rather than focusing only on final performance, SeqMem-Eval evaluates how memory states evolve, generalize, consolidate experience, and retain useful information during sequential inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T20:15:22Z)
• MemReranker: Reasoning-Aware Reranking for Agent Memory Retrieval [37.54115468116941]
  This report introduces MemReranker, a reranking model family (0.6B/4B) built on Qwen3-Reranker through multi-stage LLM knowledge distillation.<n>On the memory retrieval benchmark, MemReranker-0.6B substantially outperforms BGE-Reranker and matches open-source 4B/8B models as well as GPT-4o-mini on key metrics.<n>MemReranker-4B further achieves 0.737 MAP, with several metrics on par with Gemini-3-Flash, while maintaining inference latency at only 10-20% of large models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T12:33:57Z)
• Memory-Augmented LLM-based Multi-Agent System for Automated Feature Generation on Tabular Data [52.80567461420316]
  We propose a Memory-Augmented LLM-based Multi-Agent System (textbfMALMAS) for automated feature generation.<n>MALMAS decomposes the generation process into agents with distinct responsibilities, and a Router Agent activates an appropriate subset of agents per iteration.<n>We further integrate a memory module comprising procedural memory, feedback memory, and conceptual memory, enabling iterative refinement that adaptively guides subsequent feature generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T07:09:30Z)
• MemEvoBench: Benchmarking Memory MisEvolution in LLM Agents [78.95081012334116]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) with persistent memory enhances interaction continuity and personalization but introduces new safety risks.<n> contaminated or biased memory accumulation can trigger abnormal agent behaviors.<n>MemeEvoBench is the first benchmark evaluating memory safety in LLM agents against adversarial memory injection, noisy tool outputs, and biased feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T07:29:52Z)
• MemCollab: Cross-Agent Memory Collaboration via Contrastive Trajectory Distillation [16.57908722474221]
  Large language model (LLM)-based agents rely on memory mechanisms to reuse knowledge from past problem-solving experiences.<n>Existing approaches typically construct memory in a per-agent manner, tightly coupling stored knowledge to a single model's reasoning style.<n>We found that naively transferring memory between agents often degrades performance, as such memory entangles task-relevant knowledge with agent-specific biases.<n>We propose MemCollab, a collaborative memory framework that constructs agent-agnostic memory by contrasting reasoning trajectories generated by different agents on the same task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T14:05:47Z)
• Choosing How to Remember: Adaptive Memory Structures for LLM Agents [43.27579458682491]
  Memory is critical for enabling large language model (LLM) based agents to maintain coherent behavior over long-horizon interactions.<n>We propose a unified framework, FluxMem, that enables adaptive memory organization for LLM agents.<n> Experiments on two long-horizon benchmarks, PERSONAMEM and LoCoMo, demonstrate that our method achieves average improvements of 9.18% and 6.14%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T07:56:24Z)
• AMA: Adaptive Memory via Multi-Agent Collaboration [54.490349689939166]
  We propose Adaptive Memory via Multi-Agent Collaboration (AMA), a novel framework that leverages coordinated agents to manage memory across multiple granularities.<n>AMA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines while reducing token consumption by approximately 80% compared to full-context methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T08:09:49Z)
• SEDM: Scalable Self-Evolving Distributed Memory for Agents [23.182291416527764]
  SEDM is a verifiable and adaptive framework that transforms memory from a passive repository into an active, self-optimizing component.<n>We show that SEDM improves reasoning accuracy while reducing token overhead compared with strong memory baselines.<n>Results highlight SEDM as a scalable and sustainable memory mechanism for open-ended multi-agent collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T14:37:37Z)
• Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions [22.190297901876278]
  We identify four core competencies essential for memory agents: accurate retrieval, test-time learning, long-range understanding, and selective forgetting.<n>Existing benchmarks either rely on limited context lengths or are tailored for static, long-context settings like book-based QA.<n>We introduce MemoryAgentBench, a new benchmark specifically designed for memory agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T17:59:54Z)
• How Memory Management Impacts LLM Agents: An Empirical Study of Experience-Following Behavior [65.70584076918679]
  Memory is a critical component in large language model (LLM)-based agents.<n>This paper studies how memory management choices impact the LLM agents' behavior, especially their long-term performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T22:35:01Z)
• Memory Sharing for Large Language Model based Agents [43.53494041932615]
  This paper introduces the Memory Sharing, a framework which integrates the real-time memory filter, storage and retrieval to enhance the In-Context Learning process. The experimental results demonstrate that the MS framework significantly improves the agents' performance in addressing open-ended questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T17:57:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.