Antipatterns in AI-assisted Qualitative Data Analysis: A Catalog of Temptations and Pitfalls for Software Engineering Researchers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27927v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 05:07:25 GMT
• Title: Antipatterns in AI-assisted Qualitative Data Analysis: A Catalog of Temptations and Pitfalls for Software Engineering Researchers
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a catalog of antipatterns in AI-assisted qualitative data analysis.<n>The antipatterns are grouped into three categories reflecting escalating impact: Dangerous Drivers, Operational Missteps, and Analytical Failures.
• Score: 10.90476284349459
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: AI-assisted qualitative data analysis (QDA) offers unprecedented opportunities to streamline software engineering (SE) research, yet uncritical use risks compromising analytical rigor and flooding the field with accelerated production of low-quality research. While tactical best practices will naturally evolve over time, SE researchers currently lack strategic guidance to identify and mitigate methodological risks when attempting AI-assisted QDA. Based on our decades of qualitative SE research expertise and experience combined with an understanding of the emerging landscape of AI-assisted QDA, this paper presents a catalog of antipatterns in AI-assisted QDA - a set of assumptions and practices that initially appear advantageous but ultimately undermine analytical rigor and validity. The antipatterns are grouped into three categories reflecting escalating impact: Dangerous Drivers, Operational Missteps, and Analytical Failures. As more SE researchers attempt AI-assisted QDA, these antipatterns will help them identify and avoid common temptations and pitfalls, while reviewers can be equipped with the vocabulary and criteria to call out problematic and failed practice. Ultimately, this catalog of antipatterns can serve as a stepping stone in our responsible methodological evolution toward principled and meaningful human-AI collaboration in qualitative research.

Related papers

• Reproducible, Explainable, and Effective Evaluations of Agentic AI for Software Engineering [4.411658619208916]
  Large language models (LLMs) that underpin Agentic AI often function as black boxes, making it difficult to justify the superiority of Agentic AI approaches over baselines.<n>This study analyzes 18 papers on the topic, published or accepted by ICSE 2026, ICSE 2025, FSE 2025, and ISSTA 2025.<n>The analysis identifies prevailing approaches and their limitations in evaluating Agentic AI for SE, both in current research and potential future studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T22:24:08Z)
• Let the Barbarians In: How AI Can Accelerate Systems Performance Research [80.43506848683633]
  We term this iterative cycle of generation, evaluation, and refinement AI-Driven Research for Systems.<n>We demonstrate that ADRS-generated solutions can match or even outperform human state-of-the-art designs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T18:51:23Z)
• The Role of AI in Modern Penetration Testing [0.0]
  Penetration testing is a cornerstone of cybersecurity, traditionally driven by manual, time-intensive processes.<n>This systematic literature review examines how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping penetration testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-13T13:34:31Z)
• Toward Quantitative Modeling of Cybersecurity Risks Due to AI Misuse [50.87630846876635]
  We develop nine detailed cyber risk models.<n>Each model decomposes attacks into steps using the MITRE ATT&CK framework.<n>Individual estimates are aggregated through Monte Carlo simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T17:54:17Z)
• Barbarians at the Gate: How AI is Upending Systems Research [58.95406995634148]
  We argue that systems research, long focused on designing and evaluating new performance-oriented algorithms, is particularly well-suited for AI-driven solution discovery.<n>We term this approach as AI-Driven Research for Systems ( ADRS), which iteratively generates, evaluates, and refines solutions.<n>Our results highlight both the disruptive potential and the urgent need to adapt systems research practices in the age of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T17:49:24Z)
• AI-Driven Tools in Modern Software Quality Assurance: An Assessment of Benefits, Challenges, and Future Directions [0.0]
  The research aims to assess the benefits, challenges, and prospects of integrating modern AI-oriented tools into quality assurance processes.<n>The research demonstrates AI's transformative potential for QA but highlights the importance of a strategic approach to implementing these technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T20:22:47Z)
• Towards Improved Research Methodologies for Industrial AI: A case study of false call reduction [0.0]
  This work presents a case study on an industrial AI use case called false call reduction for automated optical inspection.<n>We identify seven weaknesses prevalent in related peer-reviewed work and experimentally show their consequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T13:48:38Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Computational Safety for Generative AI: A Signal Processing Perspective [65.268245109828]
  computational safety is a mathematical framework that enables the quantitative assessment, formulation, and study of safety challenges in GenAI.<n>We show how sensitivity analysis and loss landscape analysis can be used to detect malicious prompts with jailbreak attempts.<n>We discuss key open research challenges, opportunities, and the essential role of signal processing in computational AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T02:26:50Z)
• Reporting Risks in AI-based Assistive Technology Research: A Systematic Review [2.928964540437144]
  We conducted a systematic literature review of research into AI-based assistive technology for persons with visual impairments. Our study shows that most proposed technologies with a testable prototype have not been evaluated in a human study with members of the sight-loss community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T05:22:44Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.