MAIL: Memory-driven, Adaptive, Incremental, and Literature-grounded Framework for Hypothesis Generation in Chemistry

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28315v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 13:25:27 GMT
• Title: MAIL: Memory-driven, Adaptive, Incremental, and Literature-grounded Framework for Hypothesis Generation in Chemistry
• Abstract summary: We propose an automated approach, a Memory-augmented, Adaptive, Incremental, and Literature-grounded (MAIL) framework for hypothesis generation in chemistry.<n>Our MAIL method formulates hypothesis generation as a temporally grounded, memory-driven reasoning process.<n>We evaluated the MAIL framework on a public TOMATO-Chem dataset and a newly curated and disseminated high-novelty nature/science challenge dataset.
• Score: 1.1369130900735789
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The ever-expanding volume of the chemical literature offers unprecedented opportunities to generate novel and impactful hypotheses. However, the bottleneck lies in efficiently navigating this vast knowledge base to formulate high-quality, experimentally meaningful insights. While Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for this task, existing methods often rely on static inspiration corpora, predefined heuristics, or laborious human-in-the-loop pipelines and decision-support frameworks that limit scalability and novelty. In this work, we propose an automated approach, a Memory-augmented, Adaptive, Incremental, and Literature-grounded (MAIL) framework for hypothesis generation in chemistry. Our MAIL method formulates hypothesis generation as a temporally grounded, memory-driven reasoning process, where hypotheses emerge from an evolving conceptual path that continuously accumulates and reinterprets prior knowledge. We evaluated the MAIL framework on a public TOMATO-Chem dataset and a newly curated and disseminated high-novelty nature/science challenge (HN-NS) dataset. Across both datasets, MAIL generates structurally coherent and mechanistically plausible hypotheses, achieves the highest MIOS and MPOS by more effectively recovering the central ideas and methodological elements of the historical target hypotheses, and obtains the highest overall expert-evaluation scores for scientific quality. These results demonstrate the potential of LLMs to autonomously explore chemical domains and generate hypotheses that are both innovative and chemically plausible.

Related papers

• MHE-Former: Multi-Hypothesis Transformers via Entropy Maximization for 3D Mesh Recovery [80.22216005340283]
  We introduce an exploration--exploitation paradigm for ambiguous mesh recovery with multi-hypothesis learning and selection.<n>During exploitation, we propose Hypothesis Selection, a context-aware process for multiple predictions.<n>Our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance in accuracy and diversity across multiple datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T18:39:03Z)
• MolQuest: A Benchmark for Agentic Evaluation of Abductive Reasoning in Chemical Structure Elucidation [20.62843594129358]
  We introduce MolQuest, a novel agent-based evaluation framework for molecular structure elucidation.<n>Unlike existing datasets, MolQuest formalizes molecular structure elucidation as a multi-turn interactive task.<n>Results reveal that contemporary frontier models exhibit significant limitations in authentic scientific scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T09:57:17Z)
• Accelerating Materials Design via LLM-Guided Evolutionary Search [12.872214023537898]
  We present LLM-guided Evolution for MAterials design (LLEMA)<n>It couples scientific knowledge embedded in large language models with chemistry-informed evolutionary rules and memory-based refinement.<n> evaluated on 14 realistic tasks spanning electronics, energy, coatings, optics, and aerospace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T02:47:15Z)
• CoT-Evo: Evolutionary Distillation of Chain-of-Thought for Scientific Reasoning [63.44477226386808]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) distillation from advanced large language models (LLMs) has proven effective in general reasoning tasks.<n>But it struggles in scientific domains where even advanced models often produce incorrect or superficial reasoning.<n>We propose CoT-Evo, an evolutionary CoT distillation framework to overcome this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T05:29:56Z)
• Bayes-Entropy Collaborative Driven Agents for Research Hypotheses Generation and Optimization [4.469102316542763]
  This paper proposes a multi-agent collaborative framework called HypoAgents.<n>It generates hypotheses through diversity sampling and establishes prior beliefs.<n>It then employs etrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to gather external literature evidence.<n>It identifies high-uncertainty hypotheses using information entropy $H = - sum p_ilog p_i$ and actively refines them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T13:05:32Z)
• MOOSE-Chem2: Exploring LLM Limits in Fine-Grained Scientific Hypothesis Discovery via Hierarchical Search [102.11776494401705]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in automating scientific hypothesis generation.<n>Existing approaches primarily yield coarse-grained hypotheses lacking critical methodological and experimental details.<n>We introduce and formally define the new task of fine-grained scientific hypothesis discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T16:13:46Z)
• Sparks of Science: Hypothesis Generation Using Structured Paper Data [1.250723303641055]
  We introduce HypoGen, the first dataset of approximately 5500 structured problem-hypothesis pairs extracted from top-tier computer science conferences.<n>We demonstrate that framing hypothesis generation as conditional language modelling, with the model fine-tuned on Bit-Flip-Spark and the Chain-of-Reasoning.<n>We show that by fine-tuning on our HypoGen dataset we improve the novelty, feasibility, and overall quality of the generated hypotheses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T14:29:18Z)
• MOOSE-Chem: Large Language Models for Rediscovering Unseen Chemistry Scientific Hypotheses [95.25947149100533]
  It remains unclear whether large language models (LLMs) can autonomously generate novel and valid hypotheses in chemistry.<n>We develop a benchmark of 51 high-impact chemistry papers published and online after January 2024, each manually annotated by PhD chemists with background, inspirations, and hypothesis.<n>We assume that LLMs may already encode latent scientific knowledge associations not yet recognized by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:19:58Z)
• LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discovery [141.39722070734737]
  We propose to enhance the knowledge-driven, abstract reasoning abilities of Large Language Models with the computational strength of simulations. We introduce Scientific Generative Agent (SGA), a bilevel optimization framework. We conduct experiments to demonstrate our framework's efficacy in law discovery and molecular design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T03:04:10Z)
• Large Language Models for Automated Open-domain Scientific Hypotheses Discovery [50.40483334131271]
  This work proposes the first dataset for social science academic hypotheses discovery. Unlike previous settings, the new dataset requires (1) using open-domain data (raw web corpus) as observations; and (2) proposing hypotheses even new to humanity. A multi- module framework is developed for the task, including three different feedback mechanisms to boost performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T05:19:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.