RetailAgent: Structured Adverse Timing in Self-Conditioned Multimodal LLM Trading Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28399v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 14:53:08 GMT
• Title: RetailAgent: Structured Adverse Timing in Self-Conditioned Multimodal LLM Trading Agents
• Abstract summary: In financial markets, a sequential policy that reacts systematically to price movements may become predictable to other market participants.<n>This paper studies whether large language model (LLM) agents exhibit such directional structure through RetailAgent.
• Score: 14.77705318267562
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In financial markets, a sequential policy that reacts systematically to price movements may become predictable to other market participants. This paper studies whether large language model (LLM) agents exhibit such directional structure through RetailAgent, an experimental framework in which an LLM observes anonymized intraday equity price histories and permitted state, then repeatedly chooses long (hold the stock) or flat (stay out) before the subsequent interval return is revealed. We compare returns during long and flat intervals along the same stock's intraday path after removing the overall fraction of long decisions. This exposure-matched measure reveals persistent negative timing across modality, horizon, state, and model family. Shuffling saved action sequences substantially attenuates the effect, showing that alignment between actions and subsequent returns drives the negative score. Feeding self-authored memories into decisions further increases policy persistence, while timing becomes more negative among stock-days on which the agent uses both actions. These results reveal stable, recoverable directional structure in sequential LLM financial decisions and a behavioral signal for studying how another participant could respond to a predictable policy.

Related papers

• Are LLMs Good Financial User Simulators? A Preliminary Study [2.50104309758398]
  We present a preliminary study in a controlled paper-trading environment with 120 volunteers.<n>We evaluate temporally aligned rolling predictions and compare settings with and without point-in-time market information.<n>We also observe systematic behavioral compression: models overproduce hold actions, underpredict sell decisions, and simplify multi-security transactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T15:23:26Z)
• SegDiff: Segmented Trajectory Diffusion for Consistent and Adaptive Robot Manipulation [65.81476183180527]
  We introduce SegDiff, a closed-loop visuomotor policy that integrates the strengths of both paradigms.<n>SegDiff decomposes demonstrations into motion segments between keyposes and learns to predict the continuous trajectory from the current state to the next keypose.<n>SegDiff demonstrates significant performance gains over existing approaches across various simulated and real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-13T02:48:03Z)
• FinPersona-Bench: A Benchmark for Longitudinal Psychometric Stability of Autonomous Financial Agents [39.00852136756911]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous financial agents with explicit behavioral mandates.<n>As market context accumulates over long horizons, these mandates gradually lose their behavioral influence.<n>In crash scenarios, the behavioral gap between static agents and those receiving periodic mandate re-grounding grows 4.4x from the first to the final quarter of the simulation.<n>These findings suggest that reliable long-horizon deployment requires selective, mandate-aware re-grounding based on agent profile and market regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T11:33:29Z)
• AlphaForgeBench: Benchmarking End-to-End Trading Strategy Design with Large Language Models [23.493646150407116]
  Current evaluations of real-time trading performance overlook a critical failure mode: severe behavioral instability in sequential decision-making under uncertainty.<n>We propose AlphaForgeBench, a principled framework that reframes Large Language Models (LLMs) as quantitative researchers rather than execution agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T14:29:33Z)
• LiveTradeBench: Seeking Real-World Alpha with Large Language Models [26.976122048323873]
  Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance across benchmarks.<n>These tests occur in static settings, lacking real dynamics and uncertainty.<n>We introduce LiveTradeBench, a live trading environment for evaluating LLM agents in realistic and evolving markets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T16:47:26Z)
• Robust Reinforcement Learning in Finance: Modeling Market Impact with Elliptic Uncertainty Sets [57.179679246370114]
  In financial applications, reinforcement learning (RL) agents are commonly trained on historical data, where their actions do not influence prices.<n>During deployment, these agents trade in live markets where their own transactions can shift asset prices, a phenomenon known as market impact.<n>Traditional robust RL approaches address this model misspecification by optimizing the worst-case performance over a set of uncertainties.<n>We develop a novel class of elliptic uncertainty sets, enabling efficient and tractable robust policy evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T18:22:25Z)
• When Agents Trade: Live Multi-Market Trading Benchmark for LLM Agents [74.55061622246824]
  Agent Market Arena (AMA) is the first lifelong, real-time benchmark for evaluating Large Language Model (LLM)-based trading agents.<n>AMA integrates verified trading data, expert-checked news, and diverse agent architectures within a unified trading framework.<n>It evaluates agents across GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, Claude-3.5-haiku, Claude-sonnet-4, and Gemini-2.0-flash.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T17:54:09Z)
• Your AI, Not Your View: The Bias of LLMs in Investment Analysis [62.388554963415906]
  In finance, Large Language Models (LLMs) face frequent knowledge conflicts arising from discrepancies between their pre-trained parametric knowledge and real-time market data.<n>These conflicts are especially problematic in real-world investment services, where a model's inherent biases can misalign with institutional objectives.<n>We propose an experimental framework to investigate emergent behaviors in such conflict scenarios, offering a quantitative analysis of bias in investment analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T16:09:38Z)
• Agent Trading Arena: A Study on Numerical Understanding in LLM-Based Agents [69.58565132975504]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language tasks.<n>We present the Agent Trading Arena, a virtual zero-sum stock market in which LLM-based agents engage in competitive multi-agent trading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T08:41:01Z)
• When AI Meets Finance (StockAgent): Large Language Model-based Stock Trading in Simulated Real-world Environments [55.19252983108372]
  We have developed a multi-agent AI system called StockAgent, driven by LLMs. The StockAgent allows users to evaluate the impact of different external factors on investor trading. It avoids the test set leakage issue present in existing trading simulation systems based on AI Agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T06:49:30Z)
• Time your hedge with Deep Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) can tackle this challenge by creating a dynamic dependency between market information and hedging strategies allocation decisions. We present a realistic and augmented DRL framework that: (i) uses additional contextual information to decide an action, (ii) has a one period lag between observations and actions to account for one day lag turnover of common asset managers to rebalance their hedge, (iii) is fully tested in terms of stability and robustness thanks to a repetitive train test method called anchored walk forward training, similar in spirit to k fold cross validation for time series and (iv) allows managing leverage of our hedging
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T06:43:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.