FORESIGHT-9: Prospective and Process-Aware Evaluation of Adaptive Trading Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29372v2
• Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 14:31:11 GMT
• Title: FORESIGHT-9: Prospective and Process-Aware Evaluation of Adaptive Trading Agents
• Abstract summary: FORESIGHT-9 is a prospective and process-aware benchmark built from nine auditable counterfactual stress worldlines.<n>A common contract standardizes observations and execution while preserving each agent's native adaptation loop.<n>We evaluate two adaptive trading-agent frameworks with two foundation-model backbones across 36 long-horizon runs.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrospective backtests provide a limited test of adaptive trading agents: they cannot rule out historical contamination, expose sensitivity to a single realized market path, or reveal internal degeneration during long-horizon adaptation. We introduce FORESIGHT-9, a prospective and process-aware benchmark built from nine auditable counterfactual stress worldlines branching from a common July 2026 information boundary. Each worldline specifies staged macro-financial events and joint multi-asset anchors; a deterministic generator realizes the trajectories, while observations are disclosed according to in-world time. A common contract standardizes observations and execution while preserving each agent's native adaptation loop. We evaluate two adaptive trading-agent frameworks with two foundation-model backbones across 36 long-horizon runs. Agent rankings vary substantially across worldlines and backbones, and a fixed equal-weight policy outperforms 31 of 36 runs. Process telemetry exposes failures that terminal returns conceal: in one high-return run, the live factor library collapsed while executed holdings converged to the equal-weight fallback, even though decision records continued to report an active factor ensemble. FORESIGHT-9 therefore evaluates not only portfolio outcomes, but whether adaptive agent state and execution remain coherent across alternative futures. We release the worldlines, trajectories, audit traces, and regeneration scripts.

Related papers

• BLINDSPOT: A Benchmark for Safety and Refusal Calibration in Long-Horizon Tool-Using Agents [20.217145643468598]
  We introduce Blindspot, a benchmark for trajectory-level safety calibration of long-horizon tool-using agents.<n>Blindspot evaluates complete user-agent-environment trajectories through adaptive adversarial interaction, stateful tool execution, and execution-grounded adjudication.<n>We evaluate 13 proprietary and open-weight LLMs using eight metrics covering unsafe completion, appropriate refusal, benign utility, over-refusal, repeated-run robustness, and post-refusal failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T20:12:27Z)
• HarnessEvolve: Learning from Reference Trajectories for Reliable Agent Self-Evolution [11.431479238875712]
  We introduce HarnessEvolve, a self-evolving framework that learns from reference trajectories to achieve reliable agent self-evolution.<n>We conduct extensive experiments on several benchmarks spanning open-domain and enterprise scenarios, using different models and agent frameworks.<n>Results demonstrate that HarnessEvolve consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across all benchmarks and settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T07:31:18Z)
• Beyond Suspicious Steps: Ontological Trust in Long-Horizon Agents [13.208673657449175]
  We introduce ontological trust, a task-conditioned property of trajectory prefixes, and instantiate it as RGE.<n>RGE decomposes trust along Role, Goal, and Evidence.<n>We construct a cross-domain trajectory corpus from OSWorld, FinanceBench, and EICU-AC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T12:44:43Z)
• LayerRAG-Bench: A Cross-Layer Reliability Benchmark for Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation [0.0]
  Agentic retrieval-augmented generation systems can produce answers that appear grounded while failing at the evidence, tool-contract, authorization, or session-state layer.<n>We introduce LayerRAG-Bench, a controlled cross-layer reliability benchmark with 8 enterprise domains, 240 tasks, 9 fault scenarios, 2 contract modes, and 38,880 live task-level records.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T18:09:17Z)
• Speculative Rollback Correction for Quality-Diverse Web Agent Imitation [43.603850569331975]
  Training interactive web agents through imitation learning from expert trajectories has emerged as a highly effective approach.<n>We propose Speculative Rollback Correction (SRC), a branch-level imitation framework for resettable agent environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T08:56:27Z)
• DFAH-Bench: Benchmarking Observable Agent Instability in Financial Decision-Making [0.7699235580548228]
  DFAH-Bench is a replay benchmark that measures observable behavioral instability in financial agent decision-making.<n>We find that frontier models can agree on decisions 95% of the time while following the same tool path only 77% of the time.<n>We identify three behavioral profiles: pattern matchers that achieve near-perfect agreement by collapsing to a single output regardless of input, stable executors with relatively consistent tool-use processes, and trajectory divergers that reach the same conclusions through materially different tool paths and evidence contacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T03:31:09Z)
• ClawForge: Generating Executable Interactive Benchmarks for Command-Line Agents [59.626170560327274]
  We present textbfClawForge, a generator-backed benchmark framework for executable command-line categories under state conflict.<n>We instantiate this framework as the ClawForge-Bench (17 scenarios, 6 ability categories)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T21:34:08Z)
• Agent-ValueBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Agent Values [17.752804388034583]
  Agent-ValueBench is the first benchmark dedicated to agent values.<n>It features 394 executable environments across 16 domains, offering 4,335 value-conflict tasks.<n>Agent values first manifest as a Value Tide of cross-model homogeneity beneath interpretable counter-currents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T11:09:04Z)
• Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
  Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z)
• Claw-Eval: Toward Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents [66.97968363332465]
  We introduce Claw-Eval, an end-to-end evaluation suite addressing all three gaps in agent benchmarks.<n>Claw-Eval comprises 300 human-verified tasks spanning 9 categories across three groups.<n>Every agent action is recorded through three independent evidence channels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T17:43:18Z)
• AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents [50.481033105867205]
  We introduce AgentProcessBench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating step-level effectiveness in realistic, tool-augmented trajectories.<n>The benchmark comprises 1,000 diverse trajectories and 8,509 human-labeled step annotations with 89.1% inter-annotator agreement.<n>It features a ternary labeling scheme to capture exploration and an error propagation rule to reduce labeling ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-15T16:13:58Z)
• RetroAgent: From Solving to Evolving via Retrospective Dual Intrinsic Feedback [54.39884046754265]
  RetroAgent is an online RL framework that enables agents to master complex interactive environments.<n>Our experiments show that RetroAgent achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T16:23:33Z)
• Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol [69.11739400975445]
  We introduce the first theoretical framework for analyzing error accumulation in Model Context Protocol (MCP) agents.<n>We show that cumulative distortion exhibits linear growth and high-probability deviations bounded by $O(sqrtT)$.<n>Key findings include: semantic weighting reduces distortion by 80%, and periodic re-grounding approximately every 9 steps suffices for error control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T21:08:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.