Aspire: Can Models Self-Evolve from Vague Goals?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31111v1
• Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:14:59 GMT
• Title: Aspire: Can Models Self-Evolve from Vague Goals?
• Abstract summary: We introduce ASPIRE, a benchmark for vague-goal-driven self-evolution.<n>ASPIRE supports both model-weight and agent-harness evolution in a unified interactive environment.<n>Our experiments show that vague goals redirect search effort toward goal interpretation.
• Score: 61.65007006747275
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Many important forms of human learning begin with a vague goal, such as "become a better physicist" or "improve at research." Learners must interpret the goal, identify capability gaps, decide how to learn, and determine whether they have actually improved. In contrast, existing work on LLM self-evolution typically begins with tasks and evaluation metrics specified by humans, reducing self-evolution to optimizing an explicit objective rather than deciding what and how to learn. We introduce ASPIRE, a benchmark for vague-goal-driven self-evolution. ASPIRE provides only a natural-language capability goal while downstream evaluation tasks remain hidden. The agent must operationalize the goal by choosing data and update methods, constructing training and validation signals, and deciding when to evaluate. ASPIRE supports both model-weight and agent-harness evolution in a unified interactive environment and evaluates the resulting systems on a hidden, expert-authored set of 520 items spanning six goals. Our experiments show that vague goals redirect search effort toward goal interpretation. Current agents routinely complete training and harness-editing loops, but weight-level gains remain sparse and unstable, and the strongest evolved harness remains below the engineered Qwen-Agent reference. Agents often train on mismatched data and trust narrow self-evaluations, so local gains fail to transfer to hidden evaluation and continued search and training can erase earlier improvements.

Related papers

• Self-evolving LLM agents with in-distribution Optimization [60.05867547965365]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as powerful controllers for interactive agents in complex environments.<n>We propose Q-Evolve, a self-evolving framework for LLM agents that unifies automatic process-reward labeling and policy learning.<n>We evaluate our method on AlfWorld, WebShop, and ScienceWorld, showing Q-Evolve outperforms strong baselines in sample efficiency, robustness, and overall task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T15:09:52Z)
• Unsupervised Learning of Efficient Exploration: Pre-training Adaptive Policies via Self-Imposed Goals [0.0]
  Unsupervised pre-training can equip reinforcement learning agents with prior knowledge and accelerate learning in downstream tasks.<n>We present ULEE, an unsupervised meta-learning method that combines an in-context learner with an adversarial goal-generation strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T17:10:29Z)
• Agent0-VL: Exploring Self-Evolving Agent for Tool-Integrated Vision-Language Reasoning [52.99434388759101]
  We propose a self-evolving vision-language agent that achieves continual improvement with tool-integrated reasoning.<n>Agent0-VL incorporates tool usage not only into reasoning but also into self-evaluation and self-repair.<n>Our experiments show that Agent0-VL achieves an 12.5% improvement over the base model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T04:15:14Z)
• Environment Agnostic Goal-Conditioning, A Study of Reward-Free Autonomous Learning [0.0]
  We show that an agent can learn to solve tasks by selecting its own goals in an environment-agnostic way.<n>Our method is independent of the underlying off-policy learning algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T17:51:11Z)
• Consistent Zero-Shot Imitation with Contrastive Goal Inference [30.726311787096435]
  A prerequisite for embodied agents deployed in real world interactions ought to be training with interaction.<n>Key contribution of our paper is a method for pre-training interactive agents in a self-supervised fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T00:28:03Z)
• Truly Self-Improving Agents Require Intrinsic Metacognitive Learning [59.60803539959191]
  Self-improving agents aim to continuously acquire new capabilities with minimal supervision.<n>Current approaches face two key limitations: their self-improvement processes are often rigid, fail to generalize across tasks domains, and struggle to scale with increasing agent capabilities.<n>We argue that effective self-improvement requires intrinsic metacognitive learning, defined as an agent's intrinsic ability to actively evaluate, reflect on, and adapt its own learning processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T14:53:35Z)
• Technical Report: Evaluating Goal Drift in Language Model Agents [0.05567007955507388]
  This paper proposes a novel approach to analyzing goal drift in language models (LMs)<n>In our experiments, agents are first explicitly given a goal through their system prompt, then exposed to competing objectives through environmental pressures.<n>We find that goal drift correlates with models' increasing susceptibility to pattern-matching behaviors as the context length grows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-05T15:06:09Z)
• SELF: Self-Evolution with Language Feedback [68.6673019284853]
  'SELF' (Self-Evolution with Language Feedback) is a novel approach to advance large language models. It enables LLMs to self-improve through self-reflection, akin to human learning processes. Our experiments in mathematics and general tasks demonstrate that SELF can enhance the capabilities of LLMs without human intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T00:52:24Z)
• Automatic Curriculum Learning through Value Disagreement [95.19299356298876]
  Continually solving new, unsolved tasks is the key to learning diverse behaviors. In the multi-task domain, where an agent needs to reach multiple goals, the choice of training goals can largely affect sample efficiency. We propose setting up an automatic curriculum for goals that the agent needs to solve. We evaluate our method across 13 multi-goal robotic tasks and 5 navigation tasks, and demonstrate performance gains over current state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T03:58:25Z)
• Mutual Information-based State-Control for Intrinsically Motivated Reinforcement Learning [102.05692309417047]
  In reinforcement learning, an agent learns to reach a set of goals by means of an external reward signal. In the natural world, intelligent organisms learn from internal drives, bypassing the need for external signals. We propose to formulate an intrinsic objective as the mutual information between the goal states and the controllable states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-05T19:21:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.