Structure-Behavior Coalescence and the Limits of Traditional Systems Theory
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00042v1
- Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2026 21:04:46 GMT
- Title: Structure-Behavior Coalescence and the Limits of Traditional Systems Theory
- Abstract summary: The paper introduces Structure-Behavior Coalescence (SBC) as a reframing principle.<n>From this perspective, system identity is understood as arising from the sustained co-determination of structural organization and behavioral dynamics.<n>This reframing provides a unified way of understanding system identity, emergence, and boundary formation within a cybernetically informed systems perspective.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper examines a foundational assumption in traditional systems theory, namely that structure (the organization of components) and behavior (the evolution of system activity over time) can be treated as separable analytical dimensions. It argues that this separation contributes to persistent difficulties in explaining system identity, particularly in cases involving change, emergence, and boundary specification. To address this issue, the paper introduces Structure-Behavior Coalescence (SBC) as a reframing principle. SBC proposes that structure and behavior should not be understood as independently existing entities that are subsequently related through modeling constructs, but as mutually constitutive aspects of a single systemic process. From this perspective, system identity is understood as arising from the sustained co-determination of structural organization and behavioral dynamics, rather than from their external correspondence or alignment. This reframing provides a unified way of understanding system identity, emergence, and boundary formation within a cybernetically informed systems perspective.
Related papers
- What Is a System? An Interaction-Based Account of Structure-Behavior Coalescence in General Systems Theory [0.0]
Existing definitions commonly characterize a system in terms of elements, relationships, boundaries, functions, or interactions.<n>This paper proposes Structure-Behavior Coalescence (SBC) as an interaction-based account of what a system is.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-29T22:40:46Z) - A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z) - Systems Explaining Systems: A Framework for Intelligence and Consciousness [0.0]
This paper proposes a conceptual framework in which intelligence and consciousness emerge from relational structure rather than from prediction or domain-specific mechanisms.<n>We introduce the systems-explaining-systems principle, where consciousness emerges when higher-order systems learn and interpret the relational patterns of lower-order systems across time.<n>The framework reframes predictive processing as an emergent consequence of contextual interpretation rather than explicit forecasting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T11:19:22Z) - BEDS : Bayesian Emergent Dissipative Structures : A Formal Framework for Continuous Inference Under Energy Constraints [0.6345523830122167]
We introduce BEDS, a formal framework for analyzing inference systems that must maintain beliefs continuously under energy constraints.<n>We prove a central result linking energy, precision, and dissipation.<n>We propose the Gdel-Landauer-Prigogine conjecture, suggesting that closure pathologies across formal systems, computation, and thermodynamics share a common structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-05T18:21:02Z) - Reasoning Systems as Structured Processes: Foundations, Failures, and Formal Criteria [1.2064681974642195]
We model reasoning systems as structureds comprising phenomena, explanation space, inference and generation maps, and a principle base.<n>We survey basic internal criteria--including coherence, soundness, and completeness--and catalog typical failure modes such as contradiction, incompleteness, and non-convergence.<n>The goal of this work is to establish a foundational structure for representing and comparing reasoning systems, particularly in contexts where internal failure, adaptation, or fragmentation may arise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-03T14:04:15Z) - Semantic Numeration Systems as Dynamical Systems [55.2480439325792]
The cardinal abstract object (CAO) formed by them in a certain connectivity topology is proposed to be considered as a linear discrete dynamical system with nonlinear control.<n>The fundamental role of the configuration matrix, which combines information about the types of cardinal semantic operators in the CAO, their parameters and topology of connectivity, is demonstrated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-28T19:29:36Z) - Towards the Structure and Mechanisms of Complex Systems, the Approach of the Quantitative Theory of Meaning [0.0]
We study analysis of complex systems using a Quantitative Theory of Meaning developed as an extention of Shannon's Communication Theory.<n>The dynamics of the system are provided by reflexive communication between heterogenious agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T07:18:47Z) - Compositional Structures in Neural Embedding and Interaction Decompositions [101.40245125955306]
We describe a basic correspondence between linear algebraic structures within vector embeddings in artificial neural networks.
We introduce a characterization of compositional structures in terms of "interaction decompositions"
We establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the presence of such structures within the representations of a model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T02:39:50Z) - On the Role of Information Structure in Reinforcement Learning for Partially-Observable Sequential Teams and Games [55.2480439325792]
In a sequential decision-making problem, the information structure is the description of how events in the system occurring at different points in time affect each other.
By contrast, real-world sequential decision-making problems typically involve a complex and time-varying interdependence of system variables.
We formalize a novel reinforcement learning model which explicitly represents the information structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-01T21:28:19Z) - Initial Correlations in Open Quantum Systems: Constructing Linear
Dynamical Maps and Master Equations [62.997667081978825]
We show that, for any predetermined initial correlations, one can introduce a linear dynamical map on the space of operators of the open system.
We demonstrate that this construction leads to a linear, time-local quantum master equation with generalized Lindblad structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-24T13:43:04Z) - Non-standard entanglement structure of local unitary self-dual models as
a saturated situation of repeatability in general probabilistic theories [61.12008553173672]
We show the existence of infinite structures of quantum composite system such that it is self-dual with local unitary symmetry.
We also show the existence of a structure of quantum composite system such that non-orthogonal states in the structure are perfectly distinguishable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-29T23:37:58Z) - Expressiveness and machine processability of Knowledge Organization
Systems (KOS): An analysis of concepts and relations [0.0]
The potential of both the expressiveness and machine processability of each Knowledge Organization System is extensively regulated by its structural rules.
Ontologies explicitly define diverse types of relations, and are by their nature machine-processable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-11T12:35:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.