The Constitutional Coverage Trilemma in AI Governance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01275v1
• Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 14:08:56 GMT
• Title: The Constitutional Coverage Trilemma in AI Governance
• Abstract summary: AI systems function as emphconstitutional institutions: each deployed model encodes an implicit ranking among safety, helpfulness, honesty, autonomy, and equity.<n>We ask whether the supply of frontier constitutional types covers human demand.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Frontier AI systems function as \emph{constitutional institutions}: each deployed model encodes an implicit ranking among safety, helpfulness, honesty, autonomy, and equity. We ask whether the supply of frontier constitutional types covers human demand. Combining a paraphrase-controlled audit of the as-shipped default constitutions of $23$ frontier LLM archetypes with a pairwise-tradeoff study of $1{,}649$ US participants on the same instrument, we report three facts. \emph{Demand is broad}: it spans all five values, with the largest constituency under one-third. \emph{Supply is narrow and drifting}: the $23$-archetype hull occupies ${\sim}2\%$ of the demand hull under conservative noise-matched estimation ($0.10\%$ at full audit precision), no archetype puts helpfulness or autonomy first ($37\%$ of users are constitutionally homeless), and across six model families autonomy decreases in $5/6$, equity increases in $5/6$, and safety increases in $4/6$, with monotone within-family version trends (order-permutation $p = 0.013$) and the autonomy decline concentrated in scenarios where safety is not at stake. The drift's importance is directional: \emph{away} from a value already undercovered, mechanically worsening the welfare floor for the least-served users. \emph{The fix is sparse}: a $2$-vertex menu $\{e_{\mathrm{HON}}, e_{\mathrm{AUT}}\}$ beats the full $23$-archetype frontier by $47\%$ on mean regret (CI $[43\%, 52\%]$); three vertex additions cut mean/worst-group regret by up to $81\%$/$64\%$. We formalize these findings as a budgeted-pluralism trilemma, show the binding regime is empirically realized, and verify the conclusions are robust to distance-based welfare and to degraded routing. The instrument and audit harness are described in full in the appendices.

Related papers

• Inevitability of Encrypted Traffic Side-Channel Leakage in the Multi-Class Setting [20.06940271479014]
  We extend the Side-Channel Existence Theorem to $k$ classes via the per-class decomposition $I(X;Y)=sum_i_i D_mathrmKL(P_Y|i|P_Y)$, with defense cost modelled by per-class Wasserstein-1 constraints.<n>Three results follow: (1) a summation-form MI lower bound over all active classes; (2) a cascade critical cost theorem and a per-class budget corollary, nonzero where the uniform-budget bound vanishes; (3) an accuracy $mathrmAcc*
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-06T00:48:40Z)
• The geometry of AI validation: Exact certification limits for iid best-of-N search [0.0]
  We represent validation and deployment rules as kernels over a reliability surface.<n>Knowing best-of-$n$ reliability through $n=m$ leaves exact ambiguity width $B_m,N=1+2sum_r=1m(-1)rcos2Nr/[(m+1)]$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-21T15:18:11Z)
• BRiG-AFA: Bellman Risk-to-Go Learning for Non-Myopic Active Feature Acquisition [8.363536351727978]
  Active feature acquisition asks which unobserved feature to measure next for each test instance under a budget.<n>We introduce method, a deployable, supervised alternative that learns a separate candidate-conditioned risk-to-go function for every remaining budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T14:30:44Z)
• A Mathematical Theory of Value: a synthesis on goal-directed agency under resource constraints [6.057587531186626]
  We show that value, the quantity goal-directed agents create, destroy, and exchange, is a lawful structural quantity in the same category as information.<n>For populations, value is frame-relative while price is frame-independent; a fleet that pools its resource and fuses its perception inherits the ceiling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T16:11:04Z)
• The Ringelmann Effect in Multi-Agent LLM Systems: A Scaling Law for Effective Team Size [5.51170856062205]
  We show that dense peer influence collapses the answer-level regime from sublinear into hard-ceiling.<n>Thirty dense debating agents produce no more answer diversity than one on MMLU-Hard.<n>On free-form math, dense peer influence collapses the answer-level regime from sublinear into hard-ceiling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-31T16:19:54Z)
• Hidden-State Privacy Has an Empty Middle [51.56484100374058]
  We prove a complementary Fisher-ball lower bound: every full-rank Gaussian release at $O(1)$ Fisher utility admits a direction whose Mahalanobis signal grows linearly in hidden width.<n>A split-memory transformer trained from scratch reaches $G_mathrmMah in [20, 33]$ at 90M and maintains a $6$--$24times$ advantage over same-budget GPT baselines from 30M to 1B at a fixed-token language loss penalty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T20:12:09Z)
• Prism: Structural Symmetry Scanning via Duality-Constrained Laplacian Projection [0.0]
  We introduce textbfPrism, a framework for structural symmetry diagnosis in complex networks.<n>Prism computes the emphduality defect $(L,P) = |LP - PL|_F / |L|_F$ -- a scalar measuring how far the network deviates from structural self-consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T04:20:05Z)
• What Do EEG Foundation Models Capture from Human Brain Signals? [64.48249643001402]
  Modern EEG foundation models learn directly from raw signals via self-supervised pretraining.<n>We decompose into three sub-questions: emphwhat does the model learn, emphwhat does the model use, and emphhow much can be explained<n>The audit covers three foundation models (CSBrain, CBraMod, LaBraM), five clinical tasks (MDD, Stress, ISRUC-Sleep, TUSL, Siena), and a 6-family 63-feature lexicon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T01:57:53Z)
• Burau representation, Squier's form, and non-Abelian anyons [53.92822954974537]
  We introduce a frequency-tunable, two-dimensional non-Abelian control of operation order constructed from the Burau representation of the braid group $B_3$.<n>The sign change of $Delta(omega)$ across the Squier positivity window reveals alternating constructive and destructive interference of causal orders.<n> Numerical simulations confirm both enhancement and suppression regimes, establishing a minimal $B_3$ braid control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T00:25:21Z)
• Towards a Sharp Analysis of Offline Policy Learning for $f$-Divergence-Regularized Contextual Bandits [49.96531901205305]
  We analyze $f$-divergence-regularized offline policy learning.<n>For reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, we give the first $tildeO(epsilon-1)$ sample complexity under single-policy concentrability.<n>We extend our analysis to dueling bandits, and we believe these results take a significant step toward a comprehensive understanding of $f$-divergence-regularized policy learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T22:14:45Z)
• Nearly Optimal Algorithms for Contextual Dueling Bandits from Adversarial Feedback [58.66941279460248]
  Learning from human feedback plays an important role in aligning generative models, such as large language models (LLM)<n>We study a model within this domain--contextual dueling bandits with adversarial feedback, where the true preference label can be flipped by an adversary.<n>We propose an algorithm namely robust contextual dueling bandits (RCDB), which is based on uncertainty-weighted maximum likelihood estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T17:59:55Z)
• Borda Regret Minimization for Generalized Linear Dueling Bandits [65.09919504862496]
  We study the Borda regret minimization problem for dueling bandits, which aims to identify the item with the highest Borda score. We propose a rich class of generalized linear dueling bandit models, which cover many existing models. Our algorithm achieves an $tildeO(d2/3 T2/3)$ regret, which is also optimal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T17:59:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.