Can LLMs Discover Scientific Laws in Real and Parallel Worlds?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01552v1
• Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 17:17:59 GMT
• Title: Can LLMs Discover Scientific Laws in Real and Parallel Worlds?
• Abstract summary: We introduce SCILAWS-BENCH, a benchmark for scientific law discovery built from published research and real scientific data.<n>It comprises 118 problems drawn from 381 scientific papers, covering 291 candidate laws and roughly 8M real data points across six scientific disciplines.<n>We find that predictive fit can diverge from scientific validity, memorization shapes whether models reproduce or move beyond published formulas, and our best-of-N study reveals a selection bottleneck.
• Score: 58.76147897928744
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Scientific equation discovery has long been central to scientific progress, proceeding through iterative cycles of hypothesis generation, observational testing, and refinement under scientific constraints. As LLM capabilities advance and their role in AI for Science expands, it remains an open problem whether they can genuinely discover scientific laws and how this ability should be evaluated. Existing evaluations, however, often either simplify discovery through synthetic settings or reuse published targets that may already be familiar to LLMs. We therefore introduce SCILAWS-BENCH, a benchmark for scientific law discovery built from published research and real scientific data. It comprises 118 problems drawn from 381 scientific papers, covering 291 candidate laws and roughly 8M real data points across six scientific disciplines. Each problem is instantiated in two complementary settings: (1) SCILAWS-REAL asks models to propose laws from fixed real observations and evaluates held-out predictive fit and scientific validity derived from the source literature, and (2) SCILAWS-PARALLEL asks models to actively query residual-calibrated worlds and recover synthesized hidden laws derived from published forms. This two-setting task design preserves each problem's scientific context while separately evaluating fixed-record law discovery and active recovery of a newly synthesized hidden law. We find that predictive fit can diverge from scientific validity, memorization shapes whether models reproduce or move beyond published formulas, and our best-of-N study reveals a selection bottleneck. Our work provides a paper-grounded benchmark and new empirical perspectives for evaluating AI for scientific discovery. Project page: https://yiyihum.github.io/SciLaws-Bench

Related papers

• Probing Scientific General Intelligence of LLMs with Scientist-Aligned Workflows [203.3527268311731]
  We present an operational SGI definition grounded in the Practical Inquiry Model (PIM)<n>We operationalize it via four scientist-aligned tasks: deep research, idea generation, dry/wet experiments, and experimental reasoning.<n>Our PIM-grounded definition, workflow-centric benchmark, and empirical insights establish a foundation for AI systems that genuinely participate in scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T12:44:36Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery [91.732562776782]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to scientific research, yet prevailing science benchmarks probe decontextualized knowledge.<n>We introduce a scenario-grounded benchmark that evaluates LLMs across biology, chemistry, materials, and physics.<n>The framework assesses models at two levels: (i) question-level accuracy on scenario-tied items and (ii) project-level performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T16:20:03Z)
• Advancing the Scientific Method with Large Language Models: From Hypothesis to Discovery [35.888956949646]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming scientific research by reshaping the scientific method.<n>LLMs are involved in experimental design, data analysis, and enhancing productivity, particularly in chemistry and biology.<n>Transition to AI-driven science raises ethical questions about creativity, oversight, and responsibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T10:05:48Z)
• ResearchBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Inspiration-Based Task Decomposition [67.26124739345332]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in assisting scientific research, yet their ability to discover high-quality research hypotheses remains unexamined.<n>We introduce the first large-scale benchmark for evaluating LLMs with a near-sufficient set of sub-tasks of scientific discovery.<n>We develop an automated framework that extracts critical components - research questions, background surveys, inspirations, and hypotheses - from scientific papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T08:09:15Z)
• BoxingGym: Benchmarking Progress in Automated Experimental Design and Model Discovery [32.395366135636046]
  We introduce BoxingGym, a benchmark with 10 environments for evaluating experimental design and model discovery.<n>We compute the expected information gain (EIG), an information-theoretic quantity which measures how much an experiment reduces uncertainty about the parameters of a generative model.<n>We find that current LLMs, such as GPT-4o, struggle with both experimental design and model discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T21:15:57Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery [68.48094108571432]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way text and other modalities of data are handled. We aim to provide a more holistic view of the research landscape by unveiling cross-field and cross-modal connections between scientific LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T08:03:24Z)
• LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discovery [141.39722070734737]
  We propose to enhance the knowledge-driven, abstract reasoning abilities of Large Language Models with the computational strength of simulations. We introduce Scientific Generative Agent (SGA), a bilevel optimization framework. We conduct experiments to demonstrate our framework's efficacy in law discovery and molecular design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T03:04:10Z)
• Can Large Language Models Detect Misinformation in Scientific News Reporting? [1.0344642971058586]
  This paper investigates whether it is possible to use large language models (LLMs) to detect misinformation in scientific reporting. We first present a new labeled dataset SciNews, containing 2.4k scientific news stories drawn from trusted and untrustworthy sources. We identify dimensions of scientific validity in science news articles and explore how this can be integrated into the automated detection of scientific misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T04:07:00Z)
• Large Language Models are Zero Shot Hypothesis Proposers [17.612235393984744]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) hold a wealth of global and interdisciplinary knowledge that promises to break down information barriers. We construct a dataset consist of background knowledge and hypothesis pairs from biomedical literature. We evaluate the hypothesis generation capabilities of various top-tier instructed models in zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T10:03:49Z)
• Can Large Language Models Discern Evidence for Scientific Hypotheses? Case Studies in the Social Sciences [3.9985385067438344]
  A strong hypothesis is a best guess based on existing evidence and informed by a comprehensive view of relevant literature. With exponential increase in the number of scientific articles published annually, manual aggregation and synthesis of evidence related to a given hypothesis is a challenge. We share a novel dataset for the task of scientific hypothesis evidencing using community-driven annotations of studies in the social sciences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T04:15:17Z)
• Large Language Models for Automated Open-domain Scientific Hypotheses Discovery [50.40483334131271]
  This work proposes the first dataset for social science academic hypotheses discovery. Unlike previous settings, the new dataset requires (1) using open-domain data (raw web corpus) as observations; and (2) proposing hypotheses even new to humanity. A multi- module framework is developed for the task, including three different feedback mechanisms to boost performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T05:19:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.