How LLMs Build Fictional Worlds: Setting and Narrative Space in AI-Generated Creative Storytelling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02482v1
• Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 11:51:44 GMT
• Title: How LLMs Build Fictional Worlds: Setting and Narrative Space in AI-Generated Creative Storytelling
• Abstract summary: We compare 1,000 AI-generated stories per model in English and German with human-authored fiction from Project Gutenberg.<n>We operationalize setting through five types of narrative space: "action", "perceived," "visual," "descriptive" and "no space"<n>We find that human-authored texts predominantly employ "action space," grounding narratives in embodied character-environment interaction, whereas LLMs systematically overproduce "perceived space," emphasizing atmosphere and affect.
• Score: 0.47954782871066737
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we analyze how Large Language Models (LLMs) employ worldbuilding strategies, focusing on setting as one measurable dimension of storyworld construction. We compare 1,000 AI-generated stories per model in English and German with human-authored fiction from Project Gutenberg. Building on prior work, we operationalize setting through five types of narrative space: "action", "perceived," "visual," "descriptive" and "no space", identified using fine-tuned BERT classifiers for German and English. We generate narratives using GPT 4.1, LlaMA 3.3, Mistral 3.2, and Gemma 3 and compare their spatial distributions to a human-authored baseline. We find that human-authored texts predominantly employ "action space," grounding narratives in embodied character-environment interaction, whereas LLMs systematically overproduce "perceived space," emphasizing atmosphere and affect. This divergence remains stable across narrative time. Overall, our findings show that LLMs exhibit worldbuilding patterns that differ consistently from human-authored fiction in ways that are both model-specific and language-sensitive.

Related papers

• Do Large Language Models Always Tell The Same Stories? [2.4779770815686444]
  We investigate the diversity of large language models-generated stories through the framework of narrative similarity.<n>Our findings reveal a consistent trend: LLM-generated narratives are consistently more similar to each other than human-written stories are.<n>We show that common mitigation strategies, including negative prompting and temperature scaling, fail to meaningfully address this homogeneity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T22:52:02Z)
• Narrative Flattening: How Post-Training Compresses Thematic, Affective, and Stylistic Variation in LLM Fiction [3.8920533503590007]
  We construct a matched story-continuation paradigm across StoryStar, TMAS, and The New Yorker.<n>We compare continuations from four OLMo 32B checkpoints against matched human text.<n>Because these checkpoints share architecture, scale, tokenizer, and pretraining, the design isolates the post-training effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T02:55:34Z)
• StoryScope: Investigating idiosyncrasies in AI fiction [26.913725703912572]
  We find that AI-generated stories cluster in a shared region of narrative space, while human-authored stories exhibit greater diversity.<n>More broadly, these results suggest that differences in underlying narrative construction, not just writing style, can be used to separate human-written original works from AI-generated fiction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T15:56:38Z)
• Humans vs Vision-Language Models: A Unified Measure of Narrative Coherence [4.301794127844445]
  We compare human-written narratives with those generated by vision-language models (VLMs) on the Visual Writing Prompts corpus.<n>We find that VLMs show broadly similar coherence profiles that differ systematically from those of humans.<n>Our results indicate that, despite human-like surface fluency, model narratives exhibit systematic differences from those of humans in how they organise discourse across a visually grounded story.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T15:13:04Z)
• Living the Novel: A System for Generating Self-Training Timeline-Aware Conversational Agents from Novels [50.43968216132018]
  We present an end-to-end system that transforms any literary work into an immersive, multi-character conversational experience.<n>This system is designed to solve two fundamental challenges for LLM-driven characters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T11:57:46Z)
• Collaborative Storytelling and LLM: A Linguistic Analysis of Automatically-Generated Role-Playing Game Sessions [55.2480439325792]
  Role-playing games (RPG) are games in which players interact with one another to create narratives.<n>This emerging form of shared narrative, primarily oral, is receiving increasing attention.<n>In this paper, we aim to discover to what extent the language of Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit oral or written features when asked to generate an RPG session.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T15:10:47Z)
• Beyond Profile: From Surface-Level Facts to Deep Persona Simulation in LLMs [50.0874045899661]
  We introduce CharacterBot, a model designed to replicate both the linguistic patterns and distinctive thought patterns as manifested in the textual works of a character.<n>Using Lu Xun, a renowned Chinese writer as a case study, we propose four training tasks derived from his 17 essay collections.<n>These include a pre-training task focused on mastering external linguistic structures and knowledge, as well as three fine-tuning tasks.<n>We evaluate CharacterBot on three tasks for linguistic accuracy and opinion comprehension, demonstrating that it significantly outperforms the baselines on our adapted metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T16:11:54Z)
• Mapping News Narratives Using LLMs and Narrative-Structured Text Embeddings [0.0]
  We introduce a numerical narrative representation grounded in structuralist linguistic theory. We extract the actants using an open-source LLM and integrate them into a Narrative-Structured Text Embedding. We demonstrate the analytical insights of the method on the example of 5000 full-text news articles from Al Jazeera and The Washington Post on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T14:15:30Z)
• Are Large Language Models Capable of Generating Human-Level Narratives? [114.34140090869175]
  This paper investigates the capability of LLMs in storytelling, focusing on narrative development and plot progression. We introduce a novel computational framework to analyze narratives through three discourse-level aspects. We show that explicit integration of discourse features can enhance storytelling, as is demonstrated by over 40% improvement in neural storytelling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T08:02:49Z)
• Measuring Psychological Depth in Language Models [50.48914935872879]
  We introduce the Psychological Depth Scale (PDS), a novel framework rooted in literary theory that measures an LLM's ability to produce authentic and narratively complex stories. We empirically validate our framework by showing that humans can consistently evaluate stories based on PDS (0.72 Krippendorff's alpha) Surprisingly, GPT-4 stories either surpassed or were statistically indistinguishable from highly-rated human-written stories sourced from Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T14:51:54Z)
• The Next Chapter: A Study of Large Language Models in Storytelling [51.338324023617034]
  The application of prompt-based learning with large language models (LLMs) has exhibited remarkable performance in diverse natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This paper conducts a comprehensive investigation, utilizing both automatic and human evaluation, to compare the story generation capacity of LLMs with recent models. The results demonstrate that LLMs generate stories of significantly higher quality compared to other story generation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-24T02:44:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.