RINSE: Robust Target-Time Normality Estimation for Zero-Shot Graph Anomaly Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02497v1
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 12:03:58 GMT
- Title: RINSE: Robust Target-Time Normality Estimation for Zero-Shot Graph Anomaly Detection
- Abstract summary: RINSE (Robust Iterative Normality Self-Estimation) is a gradient-free target-time framework.<n>It estimates target normality, representation calibration, and evidence reliability from the target graph.<n>These results support robust target-time estimation as a practical approach to generalist graph anomaly detection.
- Score: 9.187714394723931
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Zero-shot graph anomaly detection seeks to deploy a detector trained on source graphs to unseen, unlabeled targets, yet domain shift can make source-derived notions of normality unreliable. We introduce RINSE (Robust Iterative Normality Self-Estimation), a gradient-free target-time framework that keeps the source-trained detector fixed while sequentially estimating target normality, representation calibration, and evidence reliability from the target graph. Its core idea is to identify a reliable subset of low-residual target nodes, use them to construct a trimmed target-aware normality model, and combine complementary anomaly evidence through reliability-gated rank fusion and encoder ensembling. Across eight unseen target graphs, RINSE achieves the highest average AUPRC among the evaluated methods under two separate preprocessing protocols, while block ablations and sensitivity analyses support the combined design. These results support robust target-time estimation as a practical approach to generalist graph anomaly detection without target labels, gradients, or per-target tuning.
Related papers
- Data-Efficient Agentic Graph Domain Adaptation via Reliability-Aware Prototype Learning [7.021321989243726]
Graph Domain Adaptation (GDA) naturally instantiates setting by transferring knowledge from labeled source graphs to unlabeled target graphs under distribution shifts.<n>Most GDA methods assume sufficient labeled source graphs, which becomes restrictive in data-efficient agentic settings.<n>We propose DEAG, a reliability-aware prototype learning framework for data-efficient GDA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-12T16:54:53Z) - Dual Spatial-Temporal Attribution: Architecture-Aligned Post-Hoc Explainability for Recurrent Graph Anomaly Detection [1.8899300124593645]
We present X-AddGraph, a post-hoc explainability framework for anomaly detection in dynamic graphs.<n>Because the detector is frozen, detection performance is preserved exactly.<n>X-AddGraph reproduces every score identically while adding explanations where none existed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-12T15:58:27Z) - Tailoring Strictly Proper Scoring Rules for Downstream Tasks: An Application to Causal Inference [48.78219918881965]
We propose a principled framework for deriving task-specific strictly proper scoring rules by matching the local curvature of the downstream error metric.<n>We apply this to the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) estimation, deriving a closed-form loss and its corresponding canonical probability mapping.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-02T08:41:25Z) - Safe-Subspace Pseudo-Label Refinement for Source-Free Graph Domain Adaptation [41.958621280228634]
Source-free graph domain adaptation (SF-GDA) aims to adapt source-trained graph models to unlabeled target graphs when source graphs are no longer accessible.<n>This paper studies SF-GDA from a selective pseudo-labeling perspective.<n>We propose SafeSubspace Pseudo-Label Refinement (S$2$PLR), a source-free graph adaptation framework that applies hard pseudo-label supervision only to target graphs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-30T16:47:21Z) - FedCIGAR: A Personalized Reconstruction Approach for Federated Graph-level Anomaly Detection [51.473064583839296]
We propose a novel Federated graph-level anomaly detection approach with Cluster-adaptIve GAted Reconstruction (FedCIGAR)<n>Specifically, we design a reconstruction-based paradigm trained on normal graphs to avoid synthetic data. Furthermore, we introduce a client-side node contribution gating mechanism and a server-side sliding window-based clustering strategy to tackle data heterogeneity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-10T09:03:54Z) - Correcting False Alarms from Unseen: Adapting Graph Anomaly Detectors at Test Time [60.341117019125214]
We propose a lightweight and plug-and-play Test-time adaptation framework for correcting Unseen Normal pattErns in graph anomaly detection (GAD)<n>To address semantic confusion, a graph aligner is employed to align the shifted data to the original one at the graph attribute level.<n>Extensive experiments on 10 real-world datasets demonstrate that TUNE significantly enhances the generalizability of pre-trained GAD models to both synthetic and real unseen normal patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-10T12:10:05Z) - Rethinking Evaluation of Infrared Small Target Detection [105.59753496831739]
This paper introduces a hybrid-level metric incorporating pixel- and target-level performance, proposing a systematic error analysis method, and emphasizing the importance of cross-dataset evaluation.<n>An open-source toolkit has be released to facilitate standardized benchmarking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-21T02:45:07Z) - Towards Self-Interpretable Graph-Level Anomaly Detection [73.1152604947837]
Graph-level anomaly detection (GLAD) aims to identify graphs that exhibit notable dissimilarity compared to the majority in a collection.
We propose a Self-Interpretable Graph aNomaly dETection model ( SIGNET) that detects anomalous graphs as well as generates informative explanations simultaneously.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T10:10:07Z) - Distributional Shift-Aware Off-Policy Interval Estimation: A Unified
Error Quantification Framework [8.572441599469597]
We study high-confidence off-policy evaluation in the context of infinite-horizon Markov decision processes.
The objective is to establish a confidence interval (CI) for the target policy value using only offline data pre-collected from unknown behavior policies.
We show that our algorithm is sample-efficient, error-robust, and provably convergent even in non-linear function approximation settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-23T06:35:44Z) - Self-Supervised Training with Autoencoders for Visual Anomaly Detection [61.62861063776813]
We focus on a specific use case in anomaly detection where the distribution of normal samples is supported by a lower-dimensional manifold.
We adapt a self-supervised learning regime that exploits discriminative information during training but focuses on the submanifold of normal examples.
We achieve a new state-of-the-art result on the MVTec AD dataset -- a challenging benchmark for visual anomaly detection in the manufacturing domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-23T14:16:30Z) - Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions.
In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data.
We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.