Differentiable Interval Bottlenecks for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Numerical Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03878v1
• Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 14:05:27 GMT
• Title: Differentiable Interval Bottlenecks for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Numerical Data
• Abstract summary: DIFFINT is an autoencoder whose latent bottleneck is structured as a set of soft, axis-aligned interval memberships.<n>It is the only interpretable detector in the statistically-tied leading cluster of seven methods.
• Score: 0.5213778368155993
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reconstruction-based anomaly detectors are accurate but opaque: a deep autoencoder flags a sample without telling a practitioner which feature ranges made it anomalous. We propose DIFFINT, an autoencoder whose latent bottleneck is structured as a set of soft, axis-aligned interval memberships learned end-to-end directly from raw numerical data, without any discretization or binarization. Each latent unit corresponds to a human-readable hyper-rectangle in feature space; an instance is encoded by how strongly it falls inside each interval relative to the other units, and its reconstruction error is the anomaly score. This keeps the power of differentiable representation learning while exposing an inspectable internal structure. We make the inductive bias precise: a certified reconstruction-error lower bound for points that fall outside every active coordinate of the learned support (with a Lipschitz-enforced decoder), and a graded, empirically verified suppression mechanism for the usual case in which only a few features are abnormal; and we provide a closed-form, label-free importance that ranks each (unit, feature) pair from quantities the model already maintains, turning trained intervals into auditable candidate constraints without ever seeing an anomaly label. On 48 ADBench benchmarks against 22 baselines under a common [-1, 1]-normalized protocol, DIFFINT attains the best mean rank overall on both metrics (4.10 on ROC-AUC, 4.16 on AUPR); among inlier-only detectors it leads its regime clearly, and it is competitive with the strongest contaminated-data detectors (see the stratified and complete-case analyses). It is the only interpretable detector in the statistically-tied leading cluster of seven methods.

Related papers

• Testing the Test: Score-Direction Instability in Class-Split Anomaly Detection [56.362776482614976]
  Within-dataset class-split evaluation is widely used as a proxy for fully unconditional out-of-distribution anomaly detection.<n>We show that this protocol can become ill-posed when the held-out anomaly class overlaps the normal mixture in representation space.<n>We introduce a simple training-free diagnostic, neighborhood class leakage, and show that it predicts score-direction instability across Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Imagenette.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T06:27:42Z)
• CORE: Robust Out-of-Distribution Detection via Confidence and Orthogonal Residual Scoring [9.25889614321249]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is essential for deploying deep learning models reliably, yet no single method performs consistently across architectures and datasets.<n>We propose CORE, which disentangles the two signals by scoring each subspace independently and combines them via normalized summation.<n> CORE achieves competitive or state-of-the-art performance across five architectures and five benchmark configurations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T21:23:54Z)
• Hierarchical Reference Sets for Robust Unsupervised Detection of Scattered and Clustered Outliers [8.21087649188741]
  Clustered outliers can be easily mistaken for normal behavior because of their relatively high local density.<n>We propose a novel outlier detection paradigm that leverages the natural neighboring relationships using graph structures.<n>Our approach enables the effective recognition of scattered outliers without interference from clustered anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T09:48:20Z)
• Universal Transformation of One-Class Classifiers for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection [51.73001988341294]
  Anomaly detection is typically formulated as a one-class classification problem.<n>We present a dataset folding method that transforms an arbitrary one-class classifier-based anomaly detector into a fully unsupervised method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T16:54:12Z)
• Noise & pattern: identity-anchored Tikhonov regularization for robust structural anomaly detection [58.535473924035365]
  Anomaly detection plays a pivotal role in automated industrial inspection, aiming to identify subtle or rare defects in otherwise uniform visual patterns.<n>We tackle structural anomaly detection using a self-supervised autoencoder that learns to repair corrupted inputs.<n>We introduce a corruption model that injects artificial disruptions into training images to mimic structural defects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T15:48:50Z)
• FUN-AD: Fully Unsupervised Learning for Anomaly Detection with Noisy Training Data [1.0650780147044159]
  We propose a novel learning-based approach for fully unsupervised anomaly detection with unlabeled and potentially contaminated training data. Our method is motivated by two observations, that i) the pairwise feature distances between the normal samples are on average likely to be smaller than those between the anomaly samples or heterogeneous samples and ii) pairs of features mutually closest to each other are likely to be homogeneous pairs. Building on the first observation that nearest-neighbor distances can distinguish between confident normal samples and anomalies, we propose a pseudo-labeling strategy using an iteratively reconstructed memory bank.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T05:51:38Z)
• GeneralAD: Anomaly Detection Across Domains by Attending to Distorted Features [68.14842693208465]
  GeneralAD is an anomaly detection framework designed to operate in semantic, near-distribution, and industrial settings. We propose a novel self-supervised anomaly generation module that employs straightforward operations like noise addition and shuffling to patch features. We extensively evaluated our approach on ten datasets, achieving state-of-the-art results in six and on-par performance in the remaining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T09:27:41Z)
• RoSAS: Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection with Contamination-Resilient Continuous Supervision [21.393509817509464]
  This paper proposes a novel semi-supervised anomaly detection method, which devises textitcontamination-resilient continuous supervisory signals Our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art competitors by 20%-30% in AUC-PR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T04:04:49Z)
• Mitigating the Mutual Error Amplification for Semi-Supervised Object Detection [92.52505195585925]
  We propose a Cross Teaching (CT) method, aiming to mitigate the mutual error amplification by introducing a rectification mechanism of pseudo labels. In contrast to existing mutual teaching methods that directly treat predictions from other detectors as pseudo labels, we propose the Label Rectification Module (LRM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T03:34:57Z)
• ESAD: End-to-end Deep Semi-supervised Anomaly Detection [85.81138474858197]
  We propose a new objective function that measures the KL-divergence between normal and anomalous data. The proposed method significantly outperforms several state-of-the-arts on multiple benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-09T08:16:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.