Corporate Language Model (CLM): Transforming Tacit and Fragmented Enterprise Knowledge into a Sovereign, Auditable, and Executable Corporate Intelligence Layer

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04377v1
• Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 18:39:07 GMT
• Title: Corporate Language Model (CLM): Transforming Tacit and Fragmented Enterprise Knowledge into a Sovereign, Auditable, and Executable Corporate Intelligence Layer
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the Corporate Language Model (CLM), a framework transforming a firm's structured, unstructured, multimodal, and tacit knowledge into an ontological-grounded enterprise foundation upon which reasoning and governed execution are composed.<n>CLM has five capability planes and four architectural pillars: a Neurosymbolic Mesh coupling generative models with a knowledge graph; a Skill Graph where reusable tactics, personas, objections, and goals are typed and composed; and a Deep Security Layer enforcing sovereignty, traceability, and human oversight.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Enterprise AI deployments fail not from model inadequacy, but because organizations lack a structured substrate encoding how they decide, negotiate, and execute. Generic LLMs carry no firm-specific ontological priors; RAG remains brittle, with no path to executable action; static playbooks encode logic but cannot reason or adapt. This demands an architecture treating tacit-knowledge capture, ontological grounding, sovereign deployment, and auditable actuation as co-designed from the start. This paper introduces the Corporate Language Model (CLM), a framework transforming a firm's structured, unstructured, multimodal, and tacit knowledge into an ontology-grounded enterprise foundation upon which reasoning and governed execution are composed. CLM has five capability planes and four architectural pillars: a Neurosymbolic Mesh coupling generative models with a knowledge graph; a Skill Graph where reusable tactics, personas, objections, and goals are typed and composed; Living Digital Twins modeling functional areas as reasoning surrogates; and a Deep Security Layer enforcing sovereignty, traceability, and human oversight. A Spec-as-Code paradigm bridges grounded intent and executable artifact. CLM is one instantiation of this foundation-centric class. Four contributions follow: CLM is defined as a distinct object of study; the Skill Graph is introduced for compositional explainability by construction; the Wisdom Listener effect is proposed, whereby tacit-capable foundations compound in value with use, connecting to dynamic capabilities and organizational learning; and evidence from a JCI-accredited tertiary hospital in Brazil instantiates three of the six maturity stages under LGPD.

Related papers

• Toward Effective and Reliable LLM Agents via Dynamic Ontology [21.48160246568531]
  Large model language (LLM) agents rely heavily on knowledge encoded in model parameters or presented as unstructured context.<n>This often results in incomplete evidence use and brittle multi-step decisions.<n>Ontologies offer a way to externalize domain concepts and relations as machine-interpretable structures.<n>We present OaK, an ontology-as-a- Kernel framework that dynamically constructs and refines task-oriented LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-24T08:33:42Z)
• A Structuration Approach to Theorizing Cybersecurity Practice: The STARC Model [0.9634859579172255]
  Cybersecurity practice runs simultaneously across analysts, teams, organizations, sectors, and regulators.<n>The theories applied to it operate at single organizational levels and cannot explain why organizations with broadly similar controls differ sharply in resilience.<n>We develop STARC, a framework for locating where cybersecurity practice succeeds or fails structurally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-28T13:58:34Z)
• The Missing Layer: Specification Infrastructure for AI Oversight [2.587194279527956]
  Every team fielding an agentic system builds its own audit schema, policy dialect, monitoring stack, and escalation path.<n>We propose a two-axis taxonomy: five technical layers (Legibility, Specification, Mediation, Evaluation, Escalation) crossed with six concerns spanning alignment, robustness, adversarial defense, security, governance, and accountability.<n>We propose six design principles for Layer 2, from elicitability and composability to adversary-awareness, traceability, and governability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-26T18:12:41Z)
• A Two-Dimensional Framework for AI Agent Design Patterns: Cognitive Function and Execution Topology [54.72352855252792]
  We propose a two-dimensional classification that combines a Cognitive Function axis with seven categories and an Execution Topology axis with six structural archetypes.<n>The resulting 7x6 matrix identifies 27 named patterns, 13 with original names and provides a principled, framework-neutral, and model-agnostic vocabulary for AI agent architecture design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T04:01:01Z)
• OOWM: Structuring Embodied Reasoning and Planning via Object-Oriented Programmatic World Modeling [62.3458279176813]
  We propose Object-Oriented World Modeling (OOWM), a novel framework that structures embodied reasoning through the lens of software engineering formalism.<n>OOWM employs Class Diagrams to ground visual perception into rigorous object hierarchies, and Activity Diagrams to operationalize planning into executable control flows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T16:01:07Z)
• Top 10 Open Challenges Steering the Future of Diffusion Language Model and Its Variants [85.33837131101342]
  We propose a strategic roadmap organized into four pillars: foundational infrastructure, algorithmic optimization, cognitive reasoning, and unified multimodal intelligence.<n>We argue that this transition is essential for developing next-generation AI capable of complex structural reasoning, dynamic self-correction, and seamless multimodal integration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T14:58:23Z)
• Construct, Align, and Reason: Large Ontology Models for Enterprise Knowledge Management [9.901440359781732]
  Traditional knowledge graphs struggle with implicit relationship discovery and lack sufficient semantic understanding for complex question answering.<n>We introduce a unified construct--align--reason framework, the large ontology model (LOM)<n>We propose a unified three-stage training pipeline: ontology instruction fine-tuning to improve structural understanding; text-ontology grounding to strengthen node semantic encoding; and multi-task instruction tuning on ontology-language pairs with curriculum learning to enhance semantic reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T05:30:03Z)
• Bridging Symbolic Control and Neural Reasoning in LLM Agents: The Structured Cognitive Loop [0.0]
  We introduce Structured Cognitive Loop (SCL), a modular architecture that separates agent cognition into five phases: Retrieval, Cognition, Control, Action, and Memory (R-CCAM)<n>At the core of SCL is Soft Symbolic Control, an adaptive governance mechanism that applies symbolic constraints to probabilistic inference.<n>We provide a complete open-source implementation demonstrating the R-CCAM loop architecture, alongside a live GPT-4o-powered travel planning agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T05:19:34Z)
• The Unified Cognitive Consciousness Theory for Language Models: Anchoring Semantics, Thresholds of Activation, and Emergent Reasoning [2.0800882594868293]
  Unified Cognitive Consciousness Theory (UCCT) casts them as vast unconscious pattern repositories.<n>UCCT formalizes this process as Bayesian competition between statistical priors learned in pre-training and context-driven target patterns.<n>We ground the theory in three principles: threshold crossing, modality, and density-distance predictive power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T18:12:43Z)
• Physics of Language Models: Part 1, Learning Hierarchical Language Structures [51.68385617116854]
  Transformer-based language models are effective but complex, and understanding their inner workings and reasoning mechanisms is a significant challenge.<n>We introduce a family of synthetic CFGs that produce hierarchical rules, capable of generating lengthy sentences.<n>We demonstrate that generative models like GPT can accurately learn and reason over CFG-defined hierarchies and generate sentences based on it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T04:28:16Z)
• Autoregressive Structured Prediction with Language Models [73.11519625765301]
  We describe an approach to model structures as sequences of actions in an autoregressive manner with PLMs. Our approach achieves the new state-of-the-art on all the structured prediction tasks we looked at.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T13:27:26Z)
• Neuro-Symbolic Causal Language Planning with Commonsense Prompting [67.06667162430118]
  Language planning aims to implement complex high-level goals by decomposition into simpler low-level steps. Previous methods require either manual exemplars or annotated programs to acquire such ability from large language models. This paper proposes Neuro-Symbolic Causal Language Planner (CLAP) that elicits procedural knowledge from the LLMs with commonsense-infused prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T22:09:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.