How Developers Discuss Generative AI: A Longitudinal Study of the Visual Studio Code Community

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04680v1
• Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 03:16:08 GMT
• Title: How Developers Discuss Generative AI: A Longitudinal Study of the Visual Studio Code Community
• Abstract summary: Generative AI tools such as GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and coding agents have rapidly become part of everyday software development.<n>This paper presents a longitudinal analysis of generative-AI-related discussions in the Visual Studio Code (VS Code) GitHub repository.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI tools such as GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and coding agents have rapidly become part of everyday software development, yet little is known about how mainstream open source communities discuss them in practice. This paper presents a longitudinal analysis of generative-AI-related discussions in the Visual Studio Code (VS Code) GitHub repository, using 43,806 candidate issues created between January 2021 and June 2026. To improve corpus quality, we combined keyword retrieval with semantic relevance filtering, yielding a filtered corpus of 25,227 AI-related issues. We applied BERTopic to the retrieved corpus to identify discussion topics, using the filtered corpus for theme validation and a robustness re-clustering, and analyzed their evolution over time using monthly prevalence and Mann-Kendall trend tests. The results show that developer discussions are dominated by practical concerns regarding the operation of AI-assisted development environments, including agent management, configuration, reliability, authentication, and billing, whereas risks frequently emphasized in survey-based studies, such as hallucination and licensing, rarely surface in this venue. This suggests that discussions of generative AI in the VS Code issue tracker primarily focus on operational aspects of AI-assisted software development. Furthermore, discussions evolved from AI-assisted code completion toward conversational and agent-based development, reflecting the increasing integration of generative AI into software development workflows. These findings suggest that GitHub Issues provide a practical, workflow-oriented perspective on generative AI that complements survey-based studies of developer perceptions.

Related papers

• On Automated and Explainable Provenance of AI-Generated Code [56.818202904805446]
  We argue that the next generation of CodeGenAI tools must be built on a foundation of explainable provenance.<n>We describe a research program combining large-scale empirical studies with post-hoc causal and interpretability techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T14:50:31Z)
• How Do AI Coding Agents Contribute to Software Development? an Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests [5.6795075579540395]
  This study aims to characterize agentic pull requests (PR) in comparison to human generated PRs.<n>We first analyze how differences in merge rates between agentic and human generated PRs vary over time.<n>We then identify the types of development tasks where AI coding agents are predominantly applied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T21:48:28Z)
• How Do Software Professionals Evaluate AI-Generated Code? (Registered Report) [4.3772632092306045]
  Recent advances in generative AI tools have significantly changed how software professionals write, evaluate, and interact with code.<n>Despite the growing adoption of and reliance on these tools, it remains unclear as to how software professionals evaluate the code they generate.<n>This research aims to build a theory of how software professionals evaluate AI-generated code, grounded in their accounts of evaluative practices, perceptions, and preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-10T14:01:00Z)
• From Conversation to Contribution: Characterizing Coding Agent in Open-Source Software [15.414964008939434]
  We study how developers' chat-based interactions with AI relate to subsequent open-source development and collaboration.<n>We find heavier AI use in smaller, less mature, and less collaborative repositories.<n>While most developers are willing to share their chat, concerns remain around appearing incompetent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-06T22:44:45Z)
• Empirical Study on the Characteristics and Evolution of AI-usage in GitHub Repositories: Evidence from Code Comments [7.213400161126317]
  We analyze 35,361 GitHub code comments that explicitly reference AI use and their associated code blocks.<n>We first open-code 500 unique comments and code blocks to derive a taxonomy of AI-assisted development activities.<n>We then annotate the full dataset using two LLM-based classifiers and aggregate predictions with Dawid-Skene expectation-maximization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T02:37:44Z)
• A Survey of Vibe Coding with Large Language Models [93.88284590533242]
  "Vibe Coding" is a development methodology where developers validate AI-generated implementations through outcome observation.<n>Despite its transformative potential, the effectiveness of this emergent paradigm remains under-explored.<n>This survey provides the first comprehensive and systematic review of Vibe Coding with large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T11:26:56Z)
• Prompting in Practice: Investigating Software Developers' Use of Generative AI Tools [17.926187565860232]
  The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools has fundamentally transformed software development.<n>This study presents a systematic investigation of how software engineers integrate GenAI tools into their professional practice.<n>We surveyed 91 software engineers, including 72 active GenAI users, to understand AI usage patterns throughout the development process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T15:02:22Z)
• CoCoNUTS: Concentrating on Content while Neglecting Uninformative Textual Styles for AI-Generated Peer Review Detection [60.52240468810558]
  We introduce CoCoNUTS, a content-oriented benchmark built upon a fine-grained dataset of AI-generated peer reviews.<n>We also develop CoCoDet, an AI review detector via a multi-task learning framework, to achieve more accurate and robust detection of AI involvement in review content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T06:03:11Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents [109.8507367518992]
  We introduce OpenHands, a platform for the development of AI agents that interact with the world in similar ways to a human developer.<n>We describe how the platform allows for the implementation of new agents, safe interaction with sandboxed environments for code execution, and incorporation of evaluation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T17:50:43Z)
• A Survey of Neural Code Intelligence: Paradigms, Advances and Beyond [84.95530356322621]
  This survey presents a systematic review of the advancements in code intelligence.<n>It covers over 50 representative models and their variants, more than 20 categories of tasks, and an extensive coverage of over 680 related works.<n>Building on our examination of the developmental trajectories, we further investigate the emerging synergies between code intelligence and broader machine intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T08:54:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.