Generating Constructive Feedback on Stories via Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04824v1
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 07:26:23 GMT
- Title: Generating Constructive Feedback on Stories via Reinforcement Learning
- Abstract summary: Constructive feedback is crucial for creative writers to refine their storytelling abilities.<n>Since receiving feedback from human experts is often costly and time-intensive, large language models (LLMs) offer a scalable and efficient alternative.<n>We present a reinforcement learning approach that steers LLMs to generate constructive feedback without the need for ground-truth feedback.
- Score: 17.493071928687993
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Constructive feedback is crucial for creative writers to refine their storytelling abilities. Since receiving feedback from human experts is often costly and time-intensive, large language models (LLMs) offer a scalable and efficient alternative as automatic writing assistants. Despite their potential, research indicates that LLM-generated feedback is often generic, lacks actionability, and fails to identify which writing issue is most critical. To address these limitations, we present a reinforcement learning approach that steers LLMs to generate constructive feedback without the need for ground-truth feedback. We train our model using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) with a novel multi-component reward function aiming at constructiveness: it prioritizes feedback that is uniquely tailored to the story, helps to improve story quality, and addresses the most critical writing issue. In automatic and human evaluation across three story corpora, our approach outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs (including Gemini) and competitive baselines. We find that providing actionable suggestions is the main driver of feedback constructiveness.
Related papers
- Expanding the Capabilities of Reinforcement Learning via Text Feedback [49.561885700139676]
We formalize a multi-turn RL setup, RL from Text Feedback (RLTF), where text feedback is available during training but not at inference.<n>To do this, we propose two methods: Self Distillation (RLTF-SD), which trains the single-turn policy to match its own feedback-conditioned second-turn generations; and Feedback Modeling (RLTF-FM), which predicts the feedback as an auxiliary objective.<n>Our results show that both methods consistently outperform strong baselines across benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T18:56:56Z) - Exposía: Academic Writing Assessment of Exposés and Peer Feedback [56.428320613219306]
We present Exposa, the first public dataset that connects writing and feedback assessment in higher education.<n>We use Exposa to benchmark state-of-the-art open-source large language models (LLMs) for two tasks: automated scoring of (1) the proposals and (2) the student reviews.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-10T11:33:26Z) - Personalized and Constructive Feedback for Computer Science Students Using the Large Language Model (LLM) [0.8409304328108455]
This paper investigates the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in processing students assessments with predefined rubrics and marking criteria.<n>We aim to leverage the power of existing LLMs for Marking Assessments, Tracking, and Evaluation (LLM-MATE) with personalized feedback to enhance students learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T15:59:30Z) - Help Me Write a Story: Evaluating LLMs' Ability to Generate Writing Feedback [57.200668979963694]
We present a novel test set of 1,300 stories that we corrupted to intentionally introduce writing issues.<n>We study the performance of commonly used LLMs in this task with both automatic and human evaluation metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-21T18:56:50Z) - The Lighthouse of Language: Enhancing LLM Agents via Critique-Guided Improvement [61.00950725408354]
Large language models (LLMs) have recently transformed from text-based assistants to autonomous agents capable of planning, reasoning, and iteratively improving their actions.<n>In this work, we introduce Critique-Guided Improvement (CGI), a novel two-player framework, comprising an actor model that explores an environment and a critic model that generates detailed nature language feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-20T10:42:33Z) - Closing the Loop: Learning to Generate Writing Feedback via Language Model Simulated Student Revisions [6.216542656489173]
We propose PROF that PROduces Feedback via learning from LM simulated student revisions.
We empirically test the efficacy of PROF and observe that our approach surpasses a variety of baseline methods in effectiveness of improving students' writing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T15:52:48Z) - Exploring LLM Prompting Strategies for Joint Essay Scoring and Feedback Generation [13.854903594424876]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in generating coherent and contextually relevant text.
This work explores several prompting strategies for LLM-based zero-shot and few-shot generation of essay feedback.
Inspired by Chain-of-Thought prompting, we study how and to what extent automated essay scoring (AES) can benefit the quality of generated feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T12:48:06Z) - Improving the Validity of Automatically Generated Feedback via Reinforcement Learning [46.667783153759636]
We propose a framework for feedback generation that optimize both correctness and alignment using reinforcement learning (RL)<n>Specifically, we use GPT-4's annotations to create preferences over feedback pairs in an augmented dataset for training via direct preference optimization (DPO)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-02T20:25:50Z) - Constructive Large Language Models Alignment with Diverse Feedback [76.9578950893839]
We introduce Constructive and Diverse Feedback (CDF) as a novel method to enhance large language models alignment.
We exploit critique feedback for easy problems, refinement feedback for medium problems, and preference feedback for hard problems.
By training our model with this diversified feedback, we achieve enhanced alignment performance while using less training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-10T09:20:14Z) - UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback [99.4633351133207]
We present textscUltraFeedback, a large-scale, high-quality, and diversified AI feedback dataset.
Our work validates the effectiveness of scaled AI feedback data in constructing strong open-source chat language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T17:40:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.