An Empirical Study on Learning Paths and Gender Dynamics in Scrum Master Roles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05186v1
• Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 14:23:22 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Study on Learning Paths and Gender Dynamics in Scrum Master Roles
• Abstract summary: We focus on the learning path for a Scrum Master role in multicultural software companies.<n>We investigate the role in relation to team size, together with the learning process for a career path, and how companies monitor soft skills development.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Context: Agile development methodology has been widely adopted by industry and the demand for experienced professionals in Agile-related roles is persistently high. Objectives: We focus on the learning path for a Scrum Master role in multicultural software companies and investigate the role in relation to team size, together with the learning process for a career path, and how companies monitor soft skills development. Method: We conducted our study in two phases, two qualitative surveys (interview studies) and performed a qualitative and quantitative data analysis of the results. Conclusions: Our results identified that the need for a Scrum Master (SM) depends on the size of the team, with our study indicating a six-member limit. There is no overall standardized process for soft skills learning or metrics to measure progress. Some companies measure soft skills based on feedback received from the client or from the team, and other companies are taking both types of feedback into consideration. Many learning initiatives, especially on soft skills for an SM role, were based on actions of the employees. The version of Record of this contribution is published in Software Engineering and Advanced Applications. SEAA 2025. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 16083. Springer, Cham. and available online at: check DOI.

Related papers

• Evaluating LLMs for Answering Student Questions in Introductory Programming Courses [0.0]
  This study investigates the capabilities of Large Language Models to safely and effectively assist educators in answering student questions within a CS1 programming course.<n>Because traditional text-matching metrics are insufficient for evaluating open-ended educational responses, we developed and validated a custom LLM-as-a-Judge metric.<n>Our findings demonstrate that models, such as Gemini 3 flash, can surpass the quality baseline of typical educator responses, achieving high alignment with expert pedagogical standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T11:22:58Z)
• Conversational Education at Scale: A Multi-LLM Agent Workflow for Procedural Learning and Pedagogic Quality Assessment [13.95997720123007]
  Large language models (LLMs) have advanced virtual educators and learners, bridging NLP with AI4Education.<n>We propose WikiHowAgent, a multi-agent workflow leveraging LLMs to simulate interactive teaching-learning conversations.<n>It integrates teacher and learner agents, an interaction manager, and an evaluator to facilitate procedural learning and assess pedagogic quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T22:56:37Z)
• Software development projects as a way for multidisciplinary soft and future skills education [0.5654295647905844]
  The paper presents a possible approach to teaching in soft and future skills in a short, intensive joint project.<n>In the project we use problem based learning, active learning and group-work teaching methodologies.<n>The results prove that the presented method increased participants soft skills in communication, cooperation, digital skills and self reflection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T14:52:40Z)
• Perspective of Software Engineering Researchers on Machine Learning Practices Regarding Research, Review, and Education [12.716955305620191]
  This study aims to contribute to the knowledge, about the synergy between Machine Learning (ML) and Software Engineering (SE)<n>We analyzed SE researchers familiar with ML or who authored SE articles using ML, along with the articles themselves.<n>We found diverse practices focusing on data collection, model training, and evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T18:21:24Z)
• MME-Survey: A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs [97.94579295913606]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have garnered increased attention from both industry and academia.<n>In the development process, evaluation is critical since it provides intuitive feedback and guidance on improving models.<n>This work aims to offer researchers an easy grasp of how to effectively evaluate MLLMs according to different needs and to inspire better evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T18:59:54Z)
• How to Measure Performance in Agile Software Development? A Mixed-Method Study [2.477589198476322]
  The study aims to identify challenges that arise when using agile software development performance metrics in practice. Results show that while widely used performance metrics are widely used in practice, agile software development teams face challenges due to a lack of transparency and standardization as well as insufficient accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T19:53:01Z)
• Generative Multi-Modal Knowledge Retrieval with Large Language Models [75.70313858231833]
  We propose an innovative end-to-end generative framework for multi-modal knowledge retrieval. Our framework takes advantage of the fact that large language models (LLMs) can effectively serve as virtual knowledge bases. We demonstrate significant improvements ranging from 3.0% to 14.6% across all evaluation metrics when compared to strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T08:44:29Z)
• Experiential Co-Learning of Software-Developing Agents [83.34027623428096]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant changes to various domains, especially in software development. We introduce Experiential Co-Learning, a novel LLM-agent learning framework. Experiments demonstrate that the framework enables agents to tackle unseen software-developing tasks more effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T13:50:42Z)
• LAMM: Language-Assisted Multi-Modal Instruction-Tuning Dataset, Framework, and Benchmark [81.42376626294812]
  We present Language-Assisted Multi-Modal instruction tuning dataset, framework, and benchmark. Our aim is to establish LAMM as a growing ecosystem for training and evaluating MLLMs. We present a comprehensive dataset and benchmark, which cover a wide range of vision tasks for 2D and 3D vision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-11T14:01:17Z)
• ElitePLM: An Empirical Study on General Language Ability Evaluation of Pretrained Language Models [78.08792285698853]
  We present a large-scale empirical study on general language ability evaluation of pretrained language models (ElitePLM) Our empirical results demonstrate that: (1) PLMs with varying training objectives and strategies are good at different ability tests; (2) fine-tuning PLMs in downstream tasks is usually sensitive to the data size and distribution; and (3) PLMs have excellent transferability between similar tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T14:18:10Z)
• Curriculum Learning for Reinforcement Learning Domains: A Framework and Survey [53.73359052511171]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) is a popular paradigm for addressing sequential decision tasks in which the agent has only limited environmental feedback. We present a framework for curriculum learning (CL) in RL, and use it to survey and classify existing CL methods in terms of their assumptions, capabilities, and goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-10T20:41:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.