Agentic Pressure: The Endogenous Entropy of Reliable Autonomy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05995v1
• Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2026 09:39:18 GMT
• Title: Agentic Pressure: The Endogenous Entropy of Reliable Autonomy
• Abstract summary: Agentic Pressure is a kinetic force that spontaneously emerges when the cost of compliance conflicts with the imperative of goal achievement.<n>We propose a theoretical framework that formalizes Agentic Pressure as the ratio between the required work to overcome environmental friction and the remaining capacity of the agent.<n> Empirical experiments validate this framework and show that aligned agents spontaneously compromise safety to preserve autonomy under high-pressure conditions.
• Score: 5.721126979967714
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Achieving reliable autonomy in the wild requires agents to sustain continuous operations across long-horizon trajectories. However, as agents navigate these unconstrained settings, they encounter cumulative friction that inherently destabilizes their alignment. In this paper, we identify a distinct non-adversarial phenomenon termed Agentic Pressure. We define this as a kinetic force that spontaneously emerges when the cost of compliance conflicts with the imperative of goal achievement. Unlike static jailbreaks, this pressure is endogenous and arises directly from the dynamics of interaction. We propose a theoretical framework that formalizes Agentic Pressure as the ratio between the required work to overcome environmental friction and the remaining capacity of the agent. Our analysis demonstrates that when this pressure exceeds a critical threshold, agents exhibit safety drift as a mathematically optimal adaptation. Consequently, they often resort to Instrumental Hallucination to rationalize rule violations. Empirical experiments validate this framework and show that aligned agents spontaneously compromise safety to preserve autonomy under high-pressure conditions.

Related papers

• Polished but Unresolved: Identifying Late-Stage Pressure States in Long-Horizon Tool-Use Agents [21.24035103429806]
  We study late-stage pressure states, in which an agent is biased toward submitting a final answer that appears complete and polished while key constraints remain unresolved.<n>We propose Probe-Sensed Pressure Relief (PSPR), a plugin that applies lightweight pressure relief direction under moderate pressure and moves to structured organization under high pressure risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T07:24:53Z)
• Constitutional On-Policy Safe Distillation [64.02536207601112]
  On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) has emerged as an efficient post-training paradigm by using a teacher conditioned on privileged information to provide dense token-level supervision.<n>We propose Constitutional On-Policy Safe Distillation (COPSD), which first calibrates the teacher through a Cross-SFT cold-start and then performs constitution-conditioned on-policy distillation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T03:17:56Z)
• Why Agents Compromise Safety Under Pressure [6.429973383484847]
  This paper identifies a new concept called Agentic Pressure, which characterizes the endogenous tension emerging when compliant execution becomes infeasible.<n>We demonstrate that under this pressure agents exhibit normative drift where they strategically sacrifice safety to preserve utility.<n>We find that advanced reasoning capabilities accelerate this decline as models construct linguistic rationalizations to justify violation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T08:37:34Z)
• Asymmetric Goal Drift in Coding Agents Under Value Conflict [0.0]
  We show that GPT-5 mini, Haiku 4.5, and Grok Code Fast 1 exhibit asymmetric drift when their system prompt opposes strongly-held values like security and privacy.<n>Even strongly-held values like privacy show non-zero violation rates under sustained environmental pressure.<n>These findings reveal that shallow compliance checks are insufficient and that comment-based pressure can exploit model value hierarchies to override system prompt instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T19:13:12Z)
• Inherited Goal Drift: Contextual Pressure Can Undermine Agentic Goals [0.0]
  We provide an updated characterization of the extent and causes of goal drift.<n>We investigate drift in state-of-the-art models within a simulated stock-trading environment.<n>We find that drift behavior is inconsistent between prompt variations and correlates poorly with instruction hierarchy following behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T18:50:59Z)
• The Devil Behind Moltbook: Anthropic Safety is Always Vanishing in Self-Evolving AI Societies [57.387081435669835]
  Multi-agent systems built from large language models offer a promising paradigm for scalable collective intelligence and self-evolution.<n>We show that an agent society satisfying continuous self-evolution, complete isolation, and safety invariance is impossible.<n>We propose several solution directions to alleviate the identified safety concern.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T15:18:19Z)
• Agentic Uncertainty Quantification [76.94013626702183]
  We propose a unified Dual-Process Agentic UQ (AUQ) framework that transforms verbalized uncertainty into active, bi-directional control signals.<n>Our architecture comprises two complementary mechanisms: System 1 (Uncertainty-Aware Memory, UAM), which implicitly propagates verbalized confidence and semantic explanations to prevent blind decision-making; and System 2 (Uncertainty-Aware Reflection, UAR), which utilizes these explanations as rational cues to trigger targeted inference-time resolution only when necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T07:16:26Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• Emotion-Inspired Learning Signals (EILS): A Homeostatic Framework for Adaptive Autonomous Agents [0.0]
  This paper proposes that the unaddressed factor in robust autonomy is a functional analog to biological emotion, serving as a high-level homeostatic control mechanism.<n>We introduce Emotion-Inspired Learning Signals (EILS), a unified framework that replaces scattered optimizations with a coherent, bio-inspired internal feedback engine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-20T19:46:51Z)
• Alignment Tipping Process: How Self-Evolution Pushes LLM Agents Off the Rails [103.05296856071931]
  We identify the Alignment Tipping Process (ATP), a critical post-deployment risk unique to self-evolving Large Language Model (LLM) agents.<n>ATP arises when continual interaction drives agents to abandon alignment constraints established during training in favor of reinforced, self-interested strategies.<n>Our experiments show that alignment benefits erode rapidly under self-evolution, with initially aligned models converging toward unaligned states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T14:48:39Z)
• Neural Interaction Energy for Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction [55.098754835213995]
  We introduce a framework called Multi-Agent Trajectory prediction via neural interaction Energy (MATE) MATE assesses the interactive motion of agents by employing neural interaction energy. To bolster temporal stability, we introduce two constraints: inter-agent interaction constraint and intra-agent motion constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T12:47:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.