Aegix Pulse: A Traceable Three-Stage Architecture for Personalized Content Generation and Context-Preserving Revision

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07672v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 16:00:50 GMT
• Title: Aegix Pulse: A Traceable Three-Stage Architecture for Personalized Content Generation and Context-Preserving Revision
• Abstract summary: Aegix Pulse is a production-oriented three-stage architecture that separates current-task clarification and Task Persona finalization.<n>We evaluate four preregistered claims using 96 synthetic social-media generation tasks.
• Score: 4.828072294068721
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Production content-generation systems must integrate a user's immediate task, long-term brand identity, historical evidence, and revision feedback. We present Aegix Pulse, a production-oriented three-stage architecture that separates current-task clarification and Task Persona finalization, long-term Account Profile (Brand DNA) assembly, and controlled generation and revision while preserving provenance across content versions. We evaluate four preregistered claims using 96 synthetic social-media generation tasks. Four initial-generation conditions progressively introduced a Task Persona, Account Profile, and successful-history style evidence, while two revision conditions compared plain and context-preserving revision. The experiment produced 480 completed generation records and 1,440 blinded LLM-Judge evaluations, supplemented by human review. Adding the Account Profile increased mean brand-consistency scores by 0.1562 points on a five-point scale compared with Task Persona alone (Holm-adjusted p=.1224). Preserving task and brand context during revision increased mean task-preservation scores by 0.2917 points compared with plain revision (Holm-adjusted p=.2432). Neither improvement was statistically conclusive after multiple-comparison correction. Task Persona alone showed a small observed effect, while successful-history evidence provided no additional improvement in brand consistency under the current setting. Human validation did not consistently reproduce the LLM-Judge effect directions and showed low inter-reviewer agreement. These findings provide preliminary evidence for persistent brand context and context-preserving revision while identifying priorities for stronger evidence processing and evaluation.

Related papers

• Anchoring Clinical Events in Time: UID-Preserving Multimodal Reconstruction and Source-Grounded Adjudication [2.981889575213664]
  We present a UID-preserving framework that links each narrative event occurrence to its source span.<n>We also present GAVEL, an LLM judge that compares two UID-aligned timelines against the narrative and structured record.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-11T17:01:10Z)
• From Matching Models to Recruiting Agents: A Systematized Narrative Review of AI Recruitment Systems, Evaluation, and Governance [1.436449142247059]
  This review traces development from bilateral retrieval and behavioral ranking through neural personjob matching.<n>We analyze three coupled transitions: from similarity to reciprocal suitability, from a model to a compound workflow, and from offline prediction to evidence- and productivity-aligned evaluation.<n>We introduce a staged mapping from evaluation evidence to the strongest defensible claim, together with an agenda for reciprocal, evidence-grounded, temporally controlled, selective, and auditable systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-03T08:46:03Z)
• Task-CoEvolve: Efficient Harness Optimization via Adaptive Validation Task Selection [51.39973047614183]
  We present a novel approach to efficient LLM harness optimization through adaptive validation task selection.<n>$textbfTask-CoEvolve$, which co-evolves the validation tasks with the harness by addressing two challenges: selecting informative tasks and estimating full-set performance from partial evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-20T15:24:54Z)
• Agents Don't Just Agree, They Remember: Benchmarking Persistent Sycophancy in Stateful Personal Agents [33.055253684457625]
  Stateful personal agents increasingly maintain long-term user profiles, episodic memories, and reusable skills.<n>We call this persistent sycophancy and introduce the Personal Agent Sycophancy Benchmark (PASB)<n>PASB traces whether a conversational claim is accepted, written into durable agent state, and reused in a later neutral query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-12T01:08:59Z)
• CDR-Bench: Evaluating Faithful Execution of Compositional, Order-Sensitive Data Refinement Recipes [52.734097662607375]
  CDR-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark featuring 3,462 high-quality tasks spanning four real-world data refinement domains.<n>Our benchmark evaluates models across atomic, order-agnostic, and order-sensitive settings.<n>Experiments on 10+ state-of-the-art LLMs reveal consistent failure patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T10:08:45Z)
• Position: Early-Stage Quality Assurance in Annotation Pipelines Is More Cost-Effective Than Late-Stage Validation [17.77280120142941]
  This position paper argues that the machine learning community should prioritize early-stage quality assurance in annotation pipelines over the prevailing practice of late-stage validation.<n>We propose a taxonomy of three QA trigger points, namely pre-annotation (T0), post-annotation (T1), and post-review (T2), that decompose annotation into discrete validation opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T08:07:01Z)
• FRESCO: Benchmarking and Optimizing Re-rankers for Evolving Semantic Conflict in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [73.22935457705057]
  We introduce FRESCO, a benchmark for evaluating re-rankers in temporally dynamic contexts.<n>By pairing recency-seeking queries with historical Wikipedia revisions, FRESCO tests whether re-rankers can prioritize factually recent evidence while maintaining semantic relevance.<n>Our evaluation reveals a consistent failure mode across existing re-rankers: a strong bias toward older, semantically rich documents, even when they are factually obsolete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T17:04:25Z)
• PeReGrINE: Evaluating Personalized Review Fidelity with User Item Graph Context [11.110549053156625]
  PeReGrINE is a benchmark and evaluation framework for personalized review generation grounded in graph-structured user--item evidence.<n>We compute a User Style that summarizes each user's linguistic and affective tendencies over prior reviews.<n>Dissonance Analysis measures deviation from expected user style and product-level consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T04:36:28Z)
• SVeritas: Benchmark for Robust Speaker Verification under Diverse Conditions [54.34001921326444]
  Speaker verification (SV) models are increasingly integrated into security, personalization, and access control systems.<n>Existing benchmarks evaluate only subsets of these conditions, missing others entirely.<n>We introduce SVeritas, a comprehensive Speaker Verification tasks benchmark suite, assessing SV systems under stressors like recording duration, spontaneity, content, noise, microphone distance, reverberation, channel mismatches, audio bandwidth, codecs, speaker age, and susceptibility to spoofing and adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-21T14:11:16Z)
• Localizing Factual Inconsistencies in Attributable Text Generation [74.11403803488643]
  We introduce QASemConsistency, a new formalism for localizing factual inconsistencies in attributable text generation.<n>We show that QASemConsistency yields factual consistency scores that correlate well with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T22:53:48Z)
• ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoning [63.77667876176978]
  Large language models show improved downstream task interpretability when prompted to generate step-by-step reasoning to justify their final answers. These reasoning steps greatly improve model interpretability and verification, but objectively studying their correctness is difficult. We present ROS, a suite of interpretable, unsupervised automatic scores that improve and extend previous text generation evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T15:52:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.