Safe Harness Self-Evolution: A Theoretical Analysis of Feasibility and Limits

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08175v1
• Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 03:04:39 GMT
• Title: Safe Harness Self-Evolution: A Theoretical Analysis of Feasibility and Limits
• Abstract summary: Harness self-evolution is the process by which an agent modifies its prompts, tools, code, or orchestration in response to task feedback.<n>We provide a systematic theoretical analysis of the feasibility and limits of safe harness self-evolution.
• Score: 36.26511953633407
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Harness self-evolution is the process by which an agent modifies its prompts, tools, code, or orchestration in response to task feedback while keeping the underlying language model frozen, with changes persisting across subsequent tasks. We provide a systematic theoretical analysis of the feasibility and limits of safe harness self-evolution, connecting modification generation, finite-data certification and selection, safe adoption, and behavior after an update. Under a fixed user-task distribution, we establish conditions guaranteeing overall expected-reward improvement while controlling changes on retained tasks, characterize the probability of generating qualified modifications, and derive finite-data bounds for safe selection and adoption. Our analysis shows that generation and certification impose distinct constraints: current task performance does not determine the probability of generating qualified modifications, and generating more candidates need not improve the guarantee of a successful update when evaluation is limiting. Stagnation may therefore arise even when improvement opportunities remain. We further show that worst-case evaluation cost for recognizing genuine improvements diverges as expected reward approaches its upper bound. Across successive updates, certified improvement guarantees accumulate over a finite run, but a successful update does not by itself guarantee that further improvement remains possible. These results provide a basis for diagnosing bottlenecks and designing safer self-evolution mechanisms.

Related papers

• HarnessEvolve: Learning from Reference Trajectories for Reliable Agent Self-Evolution [11.431479238875712]
  We introduce HarnessEvolve, a self-evolving framework that learns from reference trajectories to achieve reliable agent self-evolution.<n>We conduct extensive experiments on several benchmarks spanning open-domain and enterprise scenarios, using different models and agent frameworks.<n>Results demonstrate that HarnessEvolve consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across all benchmarks and settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T07:31:18Z)
• On-Policy Self-Evolution via Failure Trajectories for Agentic Safety Alignment [54.30690671490447]
  Existing safety-alignment signals are largely response-level or off-policy.<n>FATE transforms verifier-scored failures into repair supervision without expert demonstrations.<n>FATE reduces attack success rate by 33.5%, harmful compliance by 82.6%, and improves external trajectory-safety diagnosis by 6.5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T09:56:28Z)
• Less Approximates More: Harmonizing Performance and Confidence Faithfulness via Hybrid Post-Training for High-Stakes Tasks [52.81286869496811]
  Large language models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes tasks, where confident yet incorrect inferences may cause real-world harm.<n>We propose to jointly optimize unsupervised Reinforcement Learning from Internal Feedback with reasoning-trace-guided Reasoning Distillation.<n>We introduce HyTuning, a hybrid post-training framework that adaptively reweights RD and RLIF via a PRG-style metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T16:50:11Z)
• Beyond Fixed Tests: Repository-Level Issue Resolution as Coevolution of Code and Behavioral Constraints [17.818522356206977]
  Most large language model (LLM)-based repair systems treat behavioral constraints as fixed during repair.<n>We propose Agent-CoEvo, a coevolutionary multi-agent framework in which candidate code patches and test patches are jointly explored and refined.<n>Agent-CoEvo consistently outperforms state-of-the-art agent-based and agentless baselines in both repair success and test reproduction quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T10:26:46Z)
• SAHOO: Safeguarded Alignment for High-Order Optimization Objectives in Recursive Self-Improvement [16.505918019260964]
  SAHOO is a framework to monitor and control drift through three safeguards.<n>GDI is a multi-signal detector combining semantic, lexical, structural, and distributional measures.<n> constraint preservation checks enforce safety-critical invariants such as syntactic correctness and non-hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T14:44:51Z)
• From Passive Metric to Active Signal: The Evolving Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models [77.04403907729738]
  This survey charts the evolution of uncertainty from a passive diagnostic metric to an active control signal guiding real-time model behavior.<n>We demonstrate how uncertainty is leveraged as an active control signal across three frontiers.<n>This survey argues that mastering the new trend of uncertainty is essential for building the next generation of scalable, reliable, and trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T06:21:31Z)
• Audited Skill-Graph Self-Improvement for Agentic LLMs via Verifiable Rewards, Experience Synthesis, and Continual Memory [3.7163033180152536]
  Audited Skill-Graph Self-Improvement is a framework that treats self-improvement as iterative compilation of an agent into a skill graph.<n>We present a complete system architecture, threat model, and security analysis, and provide a fully runnable reference implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-28T19:39:47Z)
• Towards Continuous Assurance with Formal Verification and Assurance Cases [0.5483130283061118]
  We propose a unified Continuous Assurance Framework that integrates design-time, runtime, and evolution-time assurance within a traceable, model-driven workflow.<n>We demonstrate our approach on a nuclear inspection robot scenario, and discuss its alignment with the Trilateral AI Principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T18:42:38Z)
• COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
  COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z)
• Know Where You're Uncertain When Planning with Multimodal Foundation Models: A Formal Framework [54.40508478482667]
  We present a comprehensive framework to disentangle, quantify, and mitigate uncertainty in perception and plan generation.<n>We propose methods tailored to the unique properties of perception and decision-making.<n>We show that our uncertainty disentanglement framework reduces variability by up to 40% and enhances task success rates by 5% compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T17:32:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.