Q2D-Web: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Retrieval in Agentic RAG Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08887v1
• Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 15:26:05 GMT
• Title: Q2D-Web: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Retrieval in Agentic RAG Systems
• Abstract summary: We introduce Q2D-Web, a large-scale agentic retrieval benchmark consisting of a 190M-document web corpus and 70k agentic search queries in ten languages.<n>We benchmark 13 retrievers including lexical, dense, and late-interaction models and find that their relative ordering is largely insensitive to the choice of judgment set.
• Score: 5.118312084290873
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Evaluating first-stage retrievers in large-scale production RAG requires a benchmark that pairs a large-scale corpus with a large set of agent-reformulated search queries based on real user queries and their conversation threads, and that labels many relevant documents per query. No existing public benchmark evaluates this setting: large-scale collections typically provide only a small number of evaluation queries, whereas benchmarks with many queries generally contain only millions of documents. Moreover, most benchmarks assess human-written queries, while the first-stage retrievers in agentic RAG pipelines serve machine-written reformulations whose distribution differs from human search behavior. To overcome these evaluation gaps, we introduce Q2D-Web (Query2Doc-Web), a large-scale agentic retrieval benchmark consisting of a 190M-document web corpus and 70k agentic search queries in ten languages, reformulated from real-world user queries in production systems. Q2D-Web provides three sets of fixed relevance judgments: agent citations, production rankings, and a combined set that unions both signals and adds LLM-based judgments of unlabeled pooled documents to reduce false negatives. We benchmark 13 retrievers including lexical, dense, and late-interaction models and find that their relative ordering is largely insensitive to the choice of judgment set, while diverging substantially across topical domains, query languages, and query types. To enable fast evaluation, we also study subcorpus sampling as an approximation to full-corpus evaluations. Retaining a third of the corpus, selected by reciprocal rank fusion over pooled retriever runs, preserves the full-corpus model ranking under the combined judgments while raising absolute Recall@1000 only by 3 to 7 points. The public leaderboard is accessible under: https://huggingface.co/spaces/perplexity-ai/q2d-web-leaderboard

Related papers

• VisDocAgentBench: Benchmarking Agents for Visually Rich Document Retrieval [65.89247522243959]
  VisDocAgentBench is a closed-corpus benchmark comparing static and agentic retrieval under a ranked-output contract.<n>It contains 2,375 pages from 100 documents and 120 unique-target queries balanced across direct, one-bridge, and two-bridge evidence structures.<n>A strong late-interaction visual retriever reaches 97.50% Recall@1 on direct items but 2.50% on two-bridge items, exposing the limits of query--target matching when relevance depends on corpus context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T15:23:06Z)
• Towards Global Retrieval Augmented Generation: A Benchmark for Corpus-Level Reasoning [50.27838512822097]
  We introduce GlobalQA, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate global RAG capabilities.<n>We propose GlobalRAG, a multi-tool collaborative framework that preserves structural coherence through chunk-level retrieval.<n>On the Qwen2.5-14B model, GlobalRAG achieves 6.63 F1 compared to the strongest baseline's 1.51 F1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T07:29:14Z)
• Cluster-based Adaptive Retrieval: Dynamic Context Selection for RAG Applications [8.946586077722822]
  Cluster-based Adaptive Retrieval (CAR) is an algorithm that determines the optimal number of documents by analyzing the clustering patterns of ordered query-document similarity distances.<n>CAR consistently picks the optimal retrieval depth and achieves the highest TES score, outperforming every fixed top-k baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T05:11:12Z)
• Chain of Retrieval: Multi-Aspect Iterative Search Expansion and Post-Order Search Aggregation for Full Paper Retrieval [68.71038700559195]
  Chain of Retrieval(COR) is a novel iterative framework for full-paper retrieval.<n>We present SCIBENCH, a benchmark providing both complete and segmented contexts of full papers for queries and candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T08:41:53Z)
• Hierarchical Lexical Graph for Enhanced Multi-Hop Retrieval [22.33550491040999]
  RAG grounds large language models in external evidence, yet it still falters when answers must be pieced together across semantically distant documents.<n>We build two plug-and-play retrievers: StatementGraphRAG and TopicGraphRAG.<n>Our methods outperform naive chunk-based RAG achieving an average relative improvement of 23.1% in retrieval recall and correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T17:58:35Z)
• JudgeRank: Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning-Intensive Reranking [81.88787401178378]
  We introduce JudgeRank, a novel agentic reranker that emulates human cognitive processes when assessing document relevance. We evaluate JudgeRank on the reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmark, demonstrating substantial performance improvements over first-stage retrieval methods. In addition, JudgeRank performs on par with fine-tuned state-of-the-art rerankers on the popular BEIR benchmark, validating its zero-shot generalization capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T18:43:12Z)
• BRIGHT: A Realistic and Challenging Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval [54.54576644403115]
  We introduce BRIGHT, the first text retrieval benchmark that requires intensive reasoning to retrieve relevant documents.<n>Our dataset consists of 1,384 real-world queries spanning diverse domains, such as economics, psychology, mathematics, and coding.<n>We show that incorporating explicit reasoning about the query improves retrieval performance by up to 12.2 points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T17:58:27Z)
• Ask Optimal Questions: Aligning Large Language Models with Retriever's Preference in Conversation [23.74712435991676]
  RetPO is designed to optimize a language model for reformulating search queries in line with the preferences of the target retrieval systems.<n>We construct a large-scale dataset called Retrievers' Feedback on over 410K query rewrites across 12K conversations.<n>Our resulting model demonstrates superiority on two benchmarks, surpassing the previous state-of-the-art performance of rewrite-then-retrieve approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T04:41:31Z)
• UnifieR: A Unified Retriever for Large-Scale Retrieval [84.61239936314597]
  Large-scale retrieval is to recall relevant documents from a huge collection given a query. Recent retrieval methods based on pre-trained language models (PLM) can be coarsely categorized into either dense-vector or lexicon-based paradigms. We propose a new learning framework, UnifieR which unifies dense-vector and lexicon-based retrieval in one model with a dual-representing capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T11:01:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.