Multi-Agent Agentic Graph Learning via Structural Signatures
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09565v1
- Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:43:45 GMT
- Title: Multi-Agent Agentic Graph Learning via Structural Signatures
- Abstract summary: Agentic graph learning (AGL) has recently achieved promising results on graph reasoning tasks.<n>Existing methods either employ a single agent or orchestrate multiple role-based agents to reason and learn over the entire graph.<n>This paper introduces a multi-agent agentic graph learning (i.e., MAAGL) framework.
- Score: 15.798786167030853
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Agentic graph learning (AGL) has recently achieved promising results on graph reasoning tasks, where an agent powered by a large language model (LLM) sequentially samples the graph as evidence to support its final prediction. Existing methods either employ a single agent or orchestrate multiple role-based agents to reason and learn over the entire graph, but both essentially rely on a shared reasoning policy across different graph regions, which can be suboptimal for graphs with heterogeneous structural and semantic patterns. Inspired by the progress of multi-agent collaboration on complex reasoning tasks, a natural remedy is to let multiple agents own different memory and collaborate; however, applying this paradigm to graphs directly faces two challenges. First, existing AGL methods typically verbalize graph structures into natural-language descriptions for LLM agents, making the reasoning process sensitive to the ordering of structural information and thereby breaking the permutation-invariant nature of graphs. Second, incorporating increasingly large sampled neighborhoods leads to rapidly growing contexts. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a multi-agent agentic graph learning (i.e., MAAGL) framework. MAAGL partitions the graph into communities and assigns an independent agent to each community for region-specific specialization. MAAGL represents structural and semantic evidence separately. Structural evidence is summarized by a dynamically updated structural signature that is permutation-invariant and fixed in size, while semantic evidence is filtered to the top-k nodes ranked by relevance. Based on historical trajectories with similar signatures, agents estimate their confidence and trigger debate-style collaboration when needed. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets show that MAAGL outperforms SOTA AGL methods.
Related papers
- Inference-Time Graph Engineering for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows [51.56038180639833]
We introduce ReActNet, a training-free framework that compiles a query and a set of role-specialized agents into a sequence of directed communication graphs.<n>We show that ReActNet consistently improves over fixed-topology and learned-topology baselines while maintaining competitive inference cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-04T23:32:11Z) - OWLEYE: Zero-Shot Learner for Cross-Domain Graph Data Anomaly Detection [48.77471686671269]
OWLEYE is a novel framework that learns transferable patterns of normal behavior from multiple graphs.<n>We show that OWLEYE achieves superior performance and generalizability compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-27T02:08:18Z) - OFA-MAS: One-for-All Multi-Agent System Topology Design based on Mixture-of-Experts Graph Generative Models [57.94189874119267]
Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) offer a powerful paradigm for solving complex problems.<n>Current graph learning-based design methodologies often adhere to a "one-for-one" paradigm.<n>We propose OFA-TAD, a one-for-all framework that generates adaptive collaboration graphs for any task described in natural language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-19T12:23:44Z) - Graph-O1 : Monte Carlo Tree Search with Reinforcement Learning for Text-Attributed Graph Reasoning [7.792321858331646]
Graph-O1 is an agentic GraphRAG framework that enables LLMs to conduct stepwise, interactive reasoning over graphs.<n>Our approach integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with end-to-end reinforcement learning, allowing the model to explore and retrieve only the most informative subgraph components.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-26T21:32:04Z) - G-reasoner: Foundation Models for Unified Reasoning over Graph-structured Knowledge [88.82814893945077]
Large language models (LLMs) excel at complex reasoning but remain limited by static and incomplete parametric knowledge.<n>Recent graph-enhanced RAG (GraphRAG) attempts to bridge this gap by constructing tailored graphs and enabling LLMs to reason on them.<n>G-reasoner is a unified framework that integrates graph and language foundation models for reasoning over diverse graph-structured knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T04:38:12Z) - Think-on-Graph 3.0: Efficient and Adaptive LLM Reasoning on Heterogeneous Graphs via Multi-Agent Dual-Evolving Context Retrieval [35.65907480060404]
Think-on-Graph 3.0 (ToG-3) is a novel framework that introduces Multi-Agent Context Evolution and Retrieval (MACER) mechanism to overcome limitations.<n>Our core innovation is the dynamic construction and refinement of a Chunk-Triplets-Community heterogeneous graph index.<n>A multi-agent system engages in an iterative process of evidence retrieval, answer generation, sufficiency, and, crucially, evolving query and subgraph.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T00:13:10Z) - Youtu-GraphRAG: Vertically Unified Agents for Graph Retrieval-Augmented Complex Reasoning [32.78218766121055]
Graph retrieval-augmented generation (GraphRAG) has effectively enhanced large language models in complex reasoning.<n>We propose a vertically unified agentic paradigm, Youtu-GraphRAG, to jointly connect the entire framework as an intricate integration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-27T13:13:20Z) - Graph Counselor: Adaptive Graph Exploration via Multi-Agent Synergy to Enhance LLM Reasoning [4.703280619961521]
GraphRAG effectively enhances external knowledge integration capabilities by explicitly modeling knowledge relationships.<n>Existing methods suffer from two inherent limitations.<n>We propose Graph Counselor, an GraphRAG method based on multi-agent collaboration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-04T13:31:21Z) - Divide by Question, Conquer by Agent: SPLIT-RAG with Question-Driven Graph Partitioning [62.640169289390535]
SPLIT-RAG is a multi-agent RAG framework that addresses the limitations with question-driven semantic graph partitioning and collaborative subgraph retrieval.<n>The innovative framework first create Semantic Partitioning of Linked Information, then use the Type-Specialized knowledge base to achieve Multi-Agent RAG.<n>The attribute-aware graph segmentation manages to divide knowledge graphs into semantically coherent subgraphs, ensuring subgraphs align with different query types.<n>A hierarchical merging module resolves inconsistencies across subgraph-derived answers through logical verifications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-20T06:44:34Z) - Scalable and Accurate Graph Reasoning with LLM-based Multi-Agents [27.4884498301785]
We introduce GraphAgent-Reasoner, a fine-tuning-free framework for explicit and precise graph reasoning.
Inspired by distributed graph computation theory, our framework decomposes graph problems into smaller, node-centric tasks that are distributed among multiple agents.
Our framework demonstrates the capability to handle real-world graph reasoning applications such as webpage importance analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T15:34:14Z) - A Pure Transformer Pretraining Framework on Text-attributed Graphs [50.833130854272774]
We introduce a feature-centric pretraining perspective by treating graph structure as a prior.
Our framework, Graph Sequence Pretraining with Transformer (GSPT), samples node contexts through random walks.
GSPT can be easily adapted to both node classification and link prediction, demonstrating promising empirical success on various datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T22:30:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.