RiVaT-Fuse: Reliability-Calibrated Variational Tensor Fusion for Multimodal Prediction under Modality Uncertainty

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10798v1
• Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 19:59:49 GMT
• Title: RiVaT-Fuse: Reliability-Calibrated Variational Tensor Fusion for Multimodal Prediction under Modality Uncertainty
• Abstract summary: RiVaT-Fuse is a reliability-calibrated variational tensor fusion framework for image-metadata prediction.<n>It estimates a consensus latent state through a variational objective that balances image evidence, metadata evidence, structured cross-modal interaction, and stability.<n>On an image-level image-metadata prediction benchmark, RiVaT-Fuse achieves the strongest overall predictive rank among direct representation-level baselines.
• Score: 0.5249805590164902
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Image-metadata prediction requires fusing heterogeneous evidence whose reliability can vary across samples and latent factors. Existing representation-level fusion methods typically choose an aggregation architecture, such as concatenation, gating, conditional modulation, or attention, without explicitly defining what the fused representation should mean under modality uncertainty. We propose RiVaT-Fuse, a reliability-calibrated variational tensor fusion framework that defines fusion as sample-wise latent-state estimation. Rather than producing a fused vector by direct aggregation, RiVaT-Fuse estimates a consensus latent state through a variational objective that balances image evidence, metadata evidence, structured cross-modal interaction, and stability. The resulting framework replaces scalar modality confidence with matrix-valued trust geometry, decomposes interaction into additive, multiplicative, and relational components, and couples the latent state with conditional robustness and structured multi-task prediction. We provide well-posedness and stability interpretations of the latent solve and instantiate the framework with efficient low-rank-plus-diagonal trust operators. On an image-level image-metadata prediction benchmark, RiVaT-Fuse achieves the strongest overall predictive rank among direct representation-level baselines while improving probability and label stability under perturbation.

Related papers

• Adaptive Modality Reliability Diagnosis and Restoration for Robust Multimodal Intent Recognition [2.2012643583422347]
  Multimodal intent recognition combines linguistic, acoustic, and visual evidence, but individual modalities may be noisy, missing, semantically conflicting, or disproportionately dominant.<n>We propose PRIME, a closed-loop reliability guided framework that jointly diagnoses, restores, and reassesses modality quality at the sample level.<n> Experiments on multimodal intent-recognition benchmarks show that PRIME maintains competitive clean-data performance while improving under missing, noisy, conflicting, and modality-imbalanced conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T11:14:13Z)
• Dual-Edged Homogeneous-Modality Similarity: Towards Visible-Infrared Modality-Incomplete Person Re-Identification with Modality Adaptive Matching [60.86381869046298]
  We formalize the Visible-Infrared Modality-Incomplete Re-Identification (VIMI-ReID) task.<n>The unpredictable modality combinations and inherent similarity of homogeneous-modality samples in VIMI-ReID cause a significant performance drop.<n>We propose the Modality Adaptive Matching Transformer (MAMT) to extract modality-specific and modality-shared features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-21T04:10:20Z)
• MRUF: Multi-granularity Routing with Uncertainty-Aware Fusion for Robust Multimodal Sentiment Analysis [20.73891715749963]
  We propose a reliability-aware fusion method that combines multi-granularity routing with uncertainty-aware calibration.<n> MRUF summarizes sentiment-relevant representations, performs subspace- and modality-level routing, and supervises modality routing with leave-one-out error increases to estimate utterance-level modality importance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-12T06:32:54Z)
• Neural Conjugate Aggregation: Identifiable Unsupervised Multi-Sensor Regression under Heterogeneous Sensor Bias [0.0]
  We study regression-based data fusion under uncertainty, where multiple noisy and biased measurement sources are available but ground-truth labels are absent during training.<n>This setting arises in sensor networks, simulation ensembles, and scientific monitoring systems where supervision is costly or infeasible.<n>We propose the Neural Conjugate Aggregation Model (NCAM), a hierarchical Bayesian framework that combines neural networks with conjugate Gaussian inference for unsupervised multi-source fusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-20T19:30:21Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
  We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z)
• Stage-Adaptive Reliability Modeling for Continuous Valence-Arousal Estimation [11.761508894410182]
  We propose a Stage-Adaptive reliability modeling framework that explicitly estimates and calibrates modality-wise confidence during multimodal integration.<n>SAGE introduces a reliability-aware fusion mechanism that dynamically rebalances audio and visual representations according to their stage-dependent informativeness.<n>Experiments on the Aff-Wild2 benchmark demonstrate that SAGE consistently improves concordance correlation coefficient scores compared with existing multimodal fusion approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T02:45:41Z)
• Trust in One Round: Confidence Estimation for Large Language Models via Structural Signals [13.89434979851652]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in domains where errors carry high social, scientific, or safety costs.<n>We present Structural Confidence, a single-pass, model-agnostic framework that enhances output correctness prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T02:35:59Z)
• TrustLoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation for Failure Detection under Out-of-distribution Data [62.22804234013273]
  We propose a simple failure detection framework to unify and facilitate classification with rejection under both covariate and semantic shifts.<n>Our key insight is that by separating and consolidating failure-specific reliability knowledge with low-rank adapters, we can enhance the failure detection ability effectively and flexibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T09:20:55Z)
• Trustworthy Multimodal Regression with Mixture of Normal-inverse Gamma Distributions [91.63716984911278]
  We introduce a novel Mixture of Normal-Inverse Gamma distributions (MoNIG) algorithm, which efficiently estimates uncertainty in principle for adaptive integration of different modalities and produces a trustworthy regression result. Experimental results on both synthetic and different real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness and trustworthiness of our method on various multimodal regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-11T14:28:12Z)
• Trusted Multi-View Classification [76.73585034192894]
  We propose a novel multi-view classification method, termed trusted multi-view classification. It provides a new paradigm for multi-view learning by dynamically integrating different views at an evidence level. The proposed algorithm jointly utilizes multiple views to promote both classification reliability and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-03T13:30:26Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.