Toward Reliable Railway-Bogie Response Prediction Using Multifidelity TDNN and Physics-Informed Residual Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12018v2
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:35:22 GMT
- Title: Toward Reliable Railway-Bogie Response Prediction Using Multifidelity TDNN and Physics-Informed Residual Learning
- Abstract summary: Railway engineers need simulation models that predict vehicle responses across operating scenarios that cannot be tested exhaustively.<n>We present a multifidelity railway-bogie response-correction method that treats multibody simulation histories as low-fidelity information and roller-rig measurements as high-fidelity evidence.
- Score: 9.679297769625286
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Railway engineers need simulation models that predict vehicle responses across operating scenarios that cannot be tested exhaustively. Agreement with representative measurements provides essential evidence, but calibration at a limited set of conditions does not guarantee accuracy elsewhere. We present a multifidelity railway-bogie response-correction method that treats multibody simulation histories as low-fidelity information and roller-rig measurements as high-fidelity evidence. This method combines an experiment-anchored fidelity assignment with physics-informed discrepancy learning for multichannel bogie-response histories. A time-delay neural network (TDNN) represents the condition-dependent simulation trend, and development-fitted amplitude alignment defines the low-fidelity baseline. A residual-correction network then models the reproducible response component not explained by this baseline and adds it to the baseline. An effective dynamic-balance equation constrains the learned discrepancy by representing differences in inertia, damping, stiffness, and external forcing between the simulated and physical systems. The training objective combines this constraint with residual matching, temporal smoothness, and a combined channel-2 acceleration loss selected using displacement-acceleration consistency evidence. For the evaluated reconstruction case, the corrected response gives a mean coefficient of determination of 0.8197, a mean normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) of 4.6055 %, and a mean normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) of 1.9297 %. These results provide initial evidence of accurate response prediction at the held-out 385 km/h condition.
Related papers
- Kastor: An efficient fine-tuning strategy for generative emulation of PDE simulations [14.561544063927228]
We propose a comprehensive methodology to adapt a deterministic physics foundation model into a highly efficient and accurate generative surrogate.<n>First, we introduce a two-stage inference scheme that combines a large-stride causal auto-regressive model with a non-causal temporal super-resolution network.<n>Second, we present Mean prediction regularization (MPR), a novel training objective that constrains the generative model to predict the deterministic distribution mean under null noise conditioning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-06T14:41:11Z) - CANN-EUCLID: unsupervised constitutive artificial neural network model discovery from full-field data [0.0]
Constitutive artificial neural networks (CANNs) provide interpretable material model discovery.<n>CANNs have so far been used in stress-inducing settings based on apparent stress-strain data from homogeneous tests.<n>Here, we combine CANNs with the stress-unsupervised full-field discovery framework EUCLID to identify sparse hyperelastic laws.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-12T15:44:06Z) - Intervention-Based Time Series Causal Discovery via Simulator-Generated Interventional Distributions [2.0013177824602444]
We propose a framework for time series causal discovery that treats a physics-based simulator as a mechanical realization of Pearl's do operator.<n>Clamping a variable inside the simulator physically severs confounding paths, producing interventional data by construction.<n>A sign-flip corollary predicts that when simulator accuracy falls below a threshold, the estimated causal effect reverses sign.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-11T01:54:58Z) - PnP-Corrector: A Universal Correction Framework for Coupled Spatiotemporal Forecasting [62.22445401483844]
Existing methods are severely constrained by the bottleneck of compounding errors.<n>We propose a universal framework called -Cast-Corrector (Plug-and-Play Corrector)<n>Our method significantly enhances the long-term stability of coupled forecasting systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-09T13:12:33Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Adaptive Dynamics For Underwater Vehicle-Manipulator Robots [0.5161531917413708]
This paper introduces a novel uncertainty-aware adaptive dynamics model framework.<n>It embeds convex physical consistency constraints during online estimation.<n>Experiments on a BlueROV2 Heavy with a 4-DOF manipulator demonstrate rapid convergence and calibrated predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-06T18:35:48Z) - Hybrid Model Predictive Control with Physics-Informed Neural Network for Satellite Attitude Control [2.7222301668137483]
Reliable spacecraft attitude control depends on accurate prediction of attitude dynamics.<n>For spacecraft with complex dynamics, obtaining accurate physics-based models can be difficult, time-consuming, or computationally heavy.<n>This work explores Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for modeling spacecraft attitude dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-17T19:08:48Z) - Rethinking Physics-Informed Regression Beyond Training Loops and Bespoke Architectures [0.0]
We propose a method that computes the state at the prediction point, simultaneously with the derivative and curvature information of the existing samples.<n>Each query can be processed with low computational cost without any pre- or re-training, in contrast to global function approximator-based solutions such as neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-15T11:31:41Z) - Hybrid Physics-ML Model for Forward Osmosis Flux with Complete Uncertainty Quantification [0.0]
This study introduces a novel Robust Hybrid Physics-ML framework employing Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) for highly accurate, uncertainty-aware Jw prediction.<n>We train the GPR on the residual error between the detailed, non-linear FO physical model prediction (Jw_physical) and the experimental water flux (Jw_actual)<n>The model, trained on a meagre 120 data points, achieved a state-of-the-art Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 0.26% and an R2 of 0.999 on the independent test data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-11T09:27:44Z) - VIKING: Deep variational inference with stochastic projections [48.946143517489496]
Variational mean field approximations tend to struggle with contemporary overparametrized deep neural networks.<n>We propose a simple variational family that considers two independent linear subspaces of the parameter space.<n>This allows us to build a fully-correlated approximate posterior reflecting the overparametrization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-27T15:38:35Z) - Drift No More? Context Equilibria in Multi-Turn LLM Interactions [58.69551510148673]
contexts drift is the gradual divergence of a model's outputs from goal-consistent behavior across turns.<n>Unlike single-turn errors, drift unfolds temporally and is poorly captured by static evaluation metrics.<n>We show that multi-turn drift can be understood as a controllable equilibrium phenomenon rather than as inevitable decay.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T04:48:49Z) - Towards Physically Consistent Deep Learning For Climate Model Parameterizations [46.07009109585047]
parameterizations are a major source of systematic errors and large uncertainties in climate projections.
Deep learning (DL)-based parameterizations, trained on data from computationally expensive short, high-resolution simulations, have shown great promise for improving climate models.
We propose an efficient supervised learning framework for DL-based parameterizations that leads to physically consistent models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T10:02:49Z) - Addressing Misspecification in Simulation-based Inference through Data-driven Calibration [43.811367860375825]
This work introduces robust posterior estimation(RoPE), a framework that overcomes model misspecification with a small real-world calibration set of ground-truth parameter measurements.<n>Results on four synthetic tasks and two real-world problems with ground-truth labels demonstrate that RoPE outperforms baselines and consistently returns informative and calibrated credible intervals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-14T16:04:39Z) - Hybrid data-driven and physics-informed regularized learning of cyclic
plasticity with Neural Networks [0.0]
The proposed model architecture is simpler and more efficient compared to existing solutions from the literature.
The validation of the approach is carried out by means of surrogate data obtained with the Armstrong-Frederick kinematic hardening model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-04T07:09:54Z) - Fast and Accurate Error Simulation for CNNs against Soft Errors [64.54260986994163]
We present a framework for the reliability analysis of Conal Neural Networks (CNNs) via an error simulation engine.
These error models are defined based on the corruption patterns of the output of the CNN operators induced by faults.
We show that our methodology achieves about 99% accuracy of the fault effects w.r.t. SASSIFI, and a speedup ranging from 44x up to 63x w.r.t.FI, that only implements a limited set of error models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-04T19:45:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.