SAGE-Loop: Reliable Closed-Loop LLM-Driven AutoML with Trial-and-Correction and Adaptive Ensembling
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12455v1
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 05:23:04 GMT
- Title: SAGE-Loop: Reliable Closed-Loop LLM-Driven AutoML with Trial-and-Correction and Adaptive Ensembling
- Abstract summary: We propose SAGE-Loop, a reliable closed-loop, self-adaptive, LLM-driven AutoML framework.<n>It performs multi-round generation and validation for trial-and-repair, and adaptively selects ensemble strategies in both supervised and unsupervised tasks.<n>Across 20 public datasets, SAGE-Loop consistently improves performance and stability on classification, regression, and clustering tasks.
- Score: 16.060479017627724
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Automated machine learning (AutoML) is reshaping data-driven science and industrial practice, and as large language models are introduced into AutoML, pipeline reliability becomes as important as automation efficiency. However, existing AutoML still struggles to realize instant feedback and adaptive optimization during execution, so once a run drifts into a suboptimal or failed state, it lacks a process-level correction mechanism. The fundamental pathology lies in its one-way pipeline: intermediate failures are typically terminated or bypassed, while fixed paradigms often strengthen model generation but leave ensemble decisions static, weakening both execution reliability and the controlled use of structural diversity. This indicates that LLM-driven AutoML needs a closed-loop ability for trial-correction-improvement together with evidence-based use of model diversity. To this end, we propose SAGE-Loop, a reliable closed-loop, self-adaptive, LLM-driven AutoML framework that performs multi-round generation and validation for trial-and-repair, and adaptively selects ensemble strategies in both supervised and unsupervised tasks, thereby unifying how to generate with how to use models. Across 20 public datasets, SAGE-Loop consistently improves performance and stability on classification, regression, and clustering tasks. Additional results further show its ability to recover from execution failures and maintain robust pipeline behavior.
Related papers
- Trustworthy Self-Composable Big-Data-as-a-Service: An LLM-Orchestrated Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Data Engineering, AutoML, MLOps Deployment, and Drift-Aware Lifecycle Optimization [0.0]
This paper proposes a trustworthy self-composable BD frame work based on LLM-orchestrated multi-agent collaboration.<n>The proposed architecture decomposes the BD lifecycle into specialized agents for data ingestion, data cleaning, feature engineering, AutoML training, model evaluation, MLOps de ployment, monitoring, and drift detection.<n>The framework also incorporates shared artifact governance, support, human-in-the-loop checkpoints, and drift-aware feedback loops.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-16T13:34:27Z) - VLA-ATTC: Adaptive Test-Time Compute for VLA Models with Relative Action Critic Model [54.35791816657227]
We introduce textbfVLA-ATTC', a framework that endows VLA models with adaptive test-time compute.<n>VLA-ATTC employs an uncertainty-based cognitive clutch'' to dynamically transition from reflexive execution to a TTC deliberation phase.<n>On the LIBERO-LONG benchmark, VLA-ATTC reduces the failure rate of the SOTA model PI0.5 by over 50%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-02T02:13:11Z) - AutoMIA: Improved Baselines for Membership Inference Attack via Agentic Self-Exploration [49.050688065974605]
Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) serve as a fundamental auditing tool for evaluating training data leakage in machine learning models.<n>We propose AutoMIA, an agentic framework that reformulates membership inference as an automated process of self-exploration and strategy evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-01T15:17:45Z) - Execution-Verified Reinforcement Learning for Optimization Modeling [49.171122807323634]
Execution-verified learning framework treats a mathematical programming solver as a deterministic, interactive verifier.<n>Experiments on NL4OPT, MAMO, IndustryOR, and OptiBench across Gurobi, OR-Tools, and COPT show that EVOM matches or outperforms process-supervised SFT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-01T03:39:11Z) - AceGRPO: Adaptive Curriculum Enhanced Group Relative Policy Optimization for Autonomous Machine Learning Engineering [52.67783579040657]
AceGRPO is a machine learning system that prioritizes tasks at the agent's learning frontier to maximize learning efficiency.<n>Our trained Ace-30B model achieves a 100% valid submission rate on MLE-Bench-Lite, approaches the performance of proprietary frontier models, and outperforms larger open-source baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-08T10:55:03Z) - Autonomous Control Leveraging LLMs: An Agentic Framework for Next-Generation Industrial Automation [0.0]
We introduce a unified agentic framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) for both discrete fault-recovery planning and continuous process control.<n>Our results demonstrate that, with structured feedback and modular agents, LLMs can unify high-level symbolic planningand low-level continuous control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-03T11:20:22Z) - From Failures to Fixes: LLM-Driven Scenario Repair for Self-Evolving Autonomous Driving [29.36624509719055]
We propose textbfSERA, a framework that enables autonomous driving systems to self-evolve by repairing failure cases through targeted scenario recommendation.<n>By analyzing performance logs, SERA identifies failure patterns and dynamically retrieves semantically aligned scenarios from a structured bank.<n>Experiments on the benchmark show that SERA consistently improves key metrics across multiple autonomous driving baselines, demonstrating its effectiveness and generalizability under safety-critical conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-28T07:46:19Z) - MLE-Dojo: Interactive Environments for Empowering LLM Agents in Machine Learning Engineering [57.156093929365255]
Gym-style framework for systematically reinforcement learning, evaluating, and improving autonomous large language model (LLM) agents.<n>MLE-Dojo covers diverse, open-ended MLE tasks carefully curated to reflect realistic engineering scenarios.<n>Its fully executable environment supports comprehensive agent training via both supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-12T17:35:43Z) - AutoML-Agent: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Full-Pipeline AutoML [56.565200973244146]
Automated machine learning (AutoML) accelerates AI development by automating tasks in the development pipeline.<n>Recent works have started exploiting large language models (LLM) to lessen such burden.<n>This paper proposes AutoML-Agent, a novel multi-agent framework tailored for full-pipeline AutoML.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T20:01:09Z) - AutoAct: Automatic Agent Learning from Scratch for QA via Self-Planning [54.47116888545878]
AutoAct is an automatic agent learning framework for QA.
It does not rely on large-scale annotated data and synthetic planning trajectories from closed-source models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-10T16:57:24Z) - AutoEn: An AutoML method based on ensembles of predefined Machine
Learning pipelines for supervised Traffic Forecasting [1.6242924916178283]
Traffic Forecasting (TF) is gaining relevance due to its ability to mitigate traffic congestion by forecasting future traffic states.
TF poses one big challenge to the Machine Learning paradigm, known as the Model Selection Problem (MSP)
We introduce AutoEn, which is a simple and efficient method for automatically generating multi-classifier ensembles from a predefined set of ML pipelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-19T18:37:18Z) - Robusta: Robust AutoML for Feature Selection via Reinforcement Learning [24.24652530951966]
We propose the first robust AutoML framework, Robusta--based on reinforcement learning (RL)
We show that the framework is able to improve the model robustness by up to 22% while maintaining competitive accuracy on benign samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T03:12:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.