A Graph-Based Approach for Mapping Kernel-Level Telemetry to MITRE ATT&CK
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12841v1
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 13:35:27 GMT
- Title: A Graph-Based Approach for Mapping Kernel-Level Telemetry to MITRE ATT&CK
- Abstract summary: Existing automated methods depend on Cyber Threat Intelligence reports, which offer only retrospective accounts of attacks.<n>We present a methodology that collects kernel-level events via eBPF, correlates attacker commands into a provenance graph, and derives compact graph representations suitable for LLM-based reasoning.<n>We implement this methodology as an end-to-end pipeline, named Trace2ATT&CK, and evaluate it on 347 Linux Atomic Red Team tests.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Mapping observed system behavior to standardized frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK is essential for threat-informed defense, but remains largely manual. Existing automated methods depend on Cyber Threat Intelligence reports, which offer only retrospective accounts of attacks. Low-level telemetry, i.e. kernel-level system calls, instead provides evidence of adversary behavior, yet its volume and complexity have limited its use for automated mapping. We present a methodology that collects kernel-level events via eBPF, correlates attacker commands into a provenance graph, and derives compact graph representations suitable for LLM-based reasoning. These representations are mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework using both pure LLM prompting and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounded in the ATT&CK knowledge base, producing ranked technique candidates along with supporting rationales. We implement this methodology as an end-to-end pipeline, named Trace2ATT&CK and evaluate it on 347 Linux Atomic Red Team tests using locally deployed open-weights LLMs. RAG consistently improves ATT&CK mapping performance over pure prompting, while provenance graph substantially outperforms raw telemetry. These results show that local inference over graph-based behavioral descriptions can make automated ATT&CK mapping from kernel-level telemetry operationally viable, without compromising data confidentiality.
Related papers
- Defending against Model Extraction for GNNs with Model Reprogramming [57.82196268649236]
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) serve as the backbone for high-stakes applications in Machine-Learning-as-a-Service (ML)<n>Still, their black-box deployment exposes them to Model Extraction (ME) attacks.<n>Existing defenses suffer from a critical ''Euclidean bias''<n>We propose GraphRP, a proactive defense framework that repurposes Model Reprogramming for security.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-11T23:20:15Z) - Graph-Based Structural Evaluation of LLM-Translated Adversary Emulation Procedures [0.0]
Adversary emulation plans describe multi-step attacker procedures using MITRE ATT&CK techniques.<n>The framework includes bipartite GED, a telemetry-intent that converts free text into observable classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-13T13:04:23Z) - Beyond the Prompt: Jailbreaking Function-Calling LLMs via Simulated Moderation Traces [32.850551109913845]
Jailbreak attacks remain a critical threat to the safe deployment of large language models (LLMs)<n>We show that this prompt-centric paradigm overlooks a structural vulnerability in stateful, function-calling environments.<n>We exploit this architectural flaw through SMT, a black-box attack framework based on Simulated Moderation Traces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-01T06:08:07Z) - AutoMIA: Improved Baselines for Membership Inference Attack via Agentic Self-Exploration [49.050688065974605]
Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) serve as a fundamental auditing tool for evaluating training data leakage in machine learning models.<n>We propose AutoMIA, an agentic framework that reformulates membership inference as an automated process of self-exploration and strategy evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-01T15:17:45Z) - Beyond Raw Detection Scores: Markov-Informed Calibration for Boosting Machine-Generated Text Detection [105.14032334647932]
Machine-generated texts (MGTs) pose risks such as disinformation and phishing, highlighting the need for reliable detection.<n> Metric-based methods, which extract statistically distinguishable features of MGTs, are often more practical than complex model-based methods that are prone to overfitting.<n>We propose a Markov-informed score calibration strategy that models two relationships of context detection scores that may aid calibration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-08T16:06:12Z) - Constructing Multi-label Hierarchical Classification Models for MITRE ATT&CK Text Tagging [0.0]
We provide a "task space" characterization of the MITRE ATT&CK text tagging task.<n>We construct our own multi-label hierarchical classification models for the text tagging task.<n>Our models meet or surpass state-of-the-art performance while relying only on classical machine learning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-21T00:41:34Z) - Semi-supervised Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models on Text-Attributed Graphs [62.544129365882014]
We propose a novel Semi-supervised Instruction Tuning pipeline for Graph Learning, named SIT-Graph.<n> SIT-Graph is model-agnostic and can be seamlessly integrated into any graph instruction tuning method that utilizes LLMs as the predictor.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate that when incorporated into state-of-the-art graph instruction tuning methods, SIT-Graph significantly enhances their performance on text-attributed graph benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-19T08:10:53Z) - CyberLLM-FINDS 2025: Instruction-Tuned Fine-tuning of Domain-Specific LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Graph Integration for MITRE Evaluation [0.054619385369457214]
This work presents a methodology to fine-tune the Gemma-2B model into a domain-specific cybersecurity LLM.<n>We detail the processes of dataset preparation, fine-tuning, and synthetic data generation, along with implications for real-world applications in threat detection, forensic investigation, and attack analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-11T05:07:57Z) - DAG-Math: Graph-Guided Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs [54.231935013127206]
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong performance on mathematical problems when prompted with Chain-of-Thought (CoT)<n>We propose modeling CoT as a certain rule-based process over directed acyclic graphs (DAGs)<n>We introduce logical closeness, a metric that quantifies how well a model's CoT trajectory adheres to the DAG structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-19T21:05:17Z) - How Robust Are Router-LLMs? Analysis of the Fragility of LLM Routing Capabilities [62.474732677086855]
Large language model (LLM) routing has emerged as a crucial strategy for balancing computational costs with performance.<n>We propose the DSC benchmark: Diverse, Simple, and Categorized, an evaluation framework that categorizes router performance across a broad spectrum of query types.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-20T19:52:30Z) - Rule-ATT&CK Mapper (RAM): Mapping SIEM Rules to TTPs Using LLMs [22.791057694472634]
Rule-ATT&CK Mapper (RAM) is a framework that automates the mapping of structured SIEM rules to MITRE ATT&CK techniques.<n>RAM's multi-stage pipeline, which was inspired by the prompt chaining technique, enhances mapping accuracy without requiring LLM pre-training or fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-04T14:16:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.