Concept-Grounded Reasoning with Prompt-Driven Localization for Interpretable Structured Report Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15334v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:21:23 GMT
• Title: Concept-Grounded Reasoning with Prompt-Driven Localization for Interpretable Structured Report Generation
• Abstract summary: CORAL is a multimodal framework that integrates spatial grounding and concept-level supervision into a unified reasoning process.<n>CORAL employs a prompt-driven medical segmentation model to localize lesions and predicts multi-class clinical attributes through a Concept Bottleneck module.<n>Experiments on BUS-CoT and IU X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in diagnostic accuracy, concept consistency, and report quality over strong general-purpose and medical MLLMs.
• Score: 66.62662330558906
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Medical imaging modalities such as ultrasound and X-ray are widely used in clinical practice, where diagnosis follows a structured, evidence-driven workflow aligned with standardized criteria. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show promise for automated medical report generation, most existing systems rely on end-to-end multimodal fusion without modeling clinically defined intermediate attributes, leading to limited grounding and interpretability. To address this issue, we propose CORAL (COncept-grounded ReAsoning with Localization), a multimodal framework that integrates spatial grounding and concept-level supervision into a unified reasoning process. CORAL employs a prompt-driven medical segmentation model to localize lesions and predicts multi-class clinical attributes through a Concept Bottleneck module. The resulting textual concept tokens are combined with mask-modulated visual features within an MLLM to enable structured report generation and diagnostic prediction. Experiments on BUS-CoT and IU X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in diagnostic accuracy, concept consistency, and report quality over strong general-purpose and medical MLLMs, indicating that concept-grounded reasoning better aligns generation with clinical decision processes.

Related papers

• MTDiag: A Multi-Turn Diagnostic Dataset Towards Clinically Meaningful LLM Evaluation [39.83005700511833]
  We present MTDiag, a large multi-turn diagnostic dialogue dataset constructed from three heterogeneous sources.<n>We release the schema, a UserLM-8B-based utterance-generation pipeline, and the physician-validated dataset that converts structured clinical evidence into natural-language utterances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T19:27:10Z)
• ClinFusion: A Vision-Centric Multimodal LLM System for Holistic Medical Understanding [67.57715989349471]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) hold immense potential to revolutionize clinical practice, yet deploying them in the medical domain is fundamentally a vision-centric challenge.<n>We introduce ClinFusion, a vision-centric MLLM designed for holistic medical understanding.<n>We show that ClinFusion sets a new state-of-the-art across a comprehensive suite of 2D and 3D multimodal medical benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-27T17:59:49Z)
• Clinical Cognition Alignment for Gastrointestinal Diagnosis with Multimodal LLMs [63.535652574541764]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in medical image analysis.<n>Their application in gastrointestinal endoscopy is currently hindered by two critical limitations.<n>We propose a novel Clinical-Cognitive-Aligned (CogAlign) framework to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-21T07:47:37Z)
• Vision-Language Models Encode Clinical Guidelines for Concept-Based Medical Reasoning [3.2723884637302443]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) are a prominent framework for interpretable AI.<n>We propose MedCBR, a concept-based reasoning framework that integrates clinical guidelines with vision-language and reasoning models.<n>Our framework achieves interpretability and forms an end-to-end bridge from medical image analysis to decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T20:39:46Z)
• Concept-Enhanced Multimodal RAG: Towards Interpretable and Accurate Radiology Report Generation [12.226029763256962]
  Radiology Report Generation through Vision-Language Models (VLMs) promises to reduce documentation burden, improve reporting consistency, and accelerate clinical adoption.<n>Existing research treats interpretability and accuracy as separate objectives, with concept-based explainability techniques focusing primarily on transparency.<n>We present Concept-Enhanced Multimodal RAG (CEMRAG), a unified framework that decomposes visual representations into interpretable clinical concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T15:18:07Z)
• AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
  We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z)
• MMedExpert-R1: Strengthening Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Domain-Specific Adaptation and Clinical Guideline Reinforcement [63.82954136824963]
  Medical Vision-Language Models excel at perception tasks with complex clinical reasoning required in real-world scenarios.<n>We propose a novel reasoning MedVLM that addresses these challenges through domain-specific adaptation and guideline reinforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T02:32:07Z)
• Aligning Findings with Diagnosis: A Self-Consistent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Trustworthy Radiology Reporting [37.57009831483529]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for radiology report generation.<n>Our framework restructures generation into two distinct components: a think block for detailed findings and an answer block for structured disease labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T14:17:44Z)
• RAD: Towards Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Multi-modal Clinical Diagnosis [56.373297358647655]
  Retrieval-Augmented Diagnosis (RAD) is a novel framework that injects external knowledge into multimodal models directly on downstream tasks.<n>RAD operates through three key mechanisms: retrieval and refinement of disease-centered knowledge from multiple medical sources, a guideline-enhanced contrastive loss transformer, and a dual decoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T10:36:14Z)
• Citrus-V: Advancing Medical Foundation Models with Unified Medical Image Grounding for Clinical Reasoning [13.783146290218738]
  We introduce Citrus-V, a multimodal medical foundation model that combines image analysis with textual reasoning.<n>The model integrates detection, segmentation, and multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning.<n>It supports pixel-level lesion localization, structured report generation, and physician-like diagnostic inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T14:42:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.