Counterfactual Reasoning for Robust Visual Question Answering
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16567v1
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 03:06:11 GMT
- Title: Counterfactual Reasoning for Robust Visual Question Answering
- Abstract summary: We propose a novel training framework that enhances counterfactual contrastive learning for Visual Question Answering (VQA) models.<n>Our framework introduces three key contributions: (1) a three-stage curriculum for stable multi-objective optimization, (2) an enhanced Batch-Contrastive loss for more discriminative feature learning, and (3) two novel regularizers.<n>Our model achieves a competitive accuracy of 61.64% on the bias-sensitive VQA-CP v2 benchmark while maintaining 62.80% on the standard VQA v2 dataset, yielding a small generalization gap of 1.16%.
- Score: 5.8572830941696985
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Modern Visual Question Answering (VQA) models often exploit spurious correlations in training data, leading to poor out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization due to language bias. Although counterfactual learning has shown promise, existing methods can be improved to better guide attention toward causal evidence and strengthen feature discrimination. To address this, we propose a novel training framework that enhances counterfactual contrastive learning for VQA. Our framework introduces three key contributions: (1) a three-stage curriculum for stable multi-objective optimization, (2) an enhanced Batch-Contrastive loss for more discriminative feature learning, and (3) two novel regularizers, Answer-Contrastive (AC) loss to refine the prediction space and Gradient-Discrepancy (GD) loss to enforce causal visual grounding. Our model achieves a competitive accuracy of 61.64% on the bias-sensitive VQA-CP v2 benchmark while maintaining 62.80% on the standard VQA v2 dataset, yielding a small generalization gap of 1.16%. This demonstrates a strong balance between OOD robustness and in-distribution performance.
Related papers
- Harnessing Image Question Dependence for Better VLM Test-time Reinforcement Learning [66.13367818892503]
We propose TTIQ, a test-time reinforcement learning framework that harnesses image-question dependence for better vlm adaptation.<n> TTIQ teacher-forces each sampled response under the original image-question pair and its image- and question-ablated variants.<n>It combines image and question dependence with confidence to construct a response-level reward that favors jointly grounded responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-09T22:54:15Z) - FADE: From Passive Verification to Active Discovery in Counterfactual Video Understanding [19.559643217912114]
Existing multiple-choice question (MCQ) benchmarks inadvertently leak target events through their questions and candidate options.<n>We present FADE, an effective training framework for counterfactual discovery and explanation.<n>FADE achieves state-of-the-art strict paired scores across all three tasks on DualityVidQA-test and IPV-Bench, outperforming GPT-5.6.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-11T10:22:08Z) - Continual Action Quality Assessment via Adaptive Manifold-Aligned Graph Regularization [53.82400605816587]
Action Quality Assessment (AQA) quantifies human actions in videos, supporting applications in sports scoring, rehabilitation, and skill evaluation.<n>A major challenge lies in the non-stationary nature of quality distributions in real-world scenarios.<n>We introduce Continual AQA (CAQA), which equips with Continual Learning capabilities to handle evolving distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-08T10:09:47Z) - VQAThinker: Exploring Generalizable and Explainable Video Quality Assessment via Reinforcement Learning [50.34205095371895]
Video quality assessment aims to objectively quantify perceptual quality degradation.<n>Existing VQA models suffer from two critical limitations.<n>We propose textbfVQAThinker, a reasoning-based VQA framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-08T06:16:23Z) - Q-Ponder: A Unified Training Pipeline for Reasoning-based Visual Quality Assessment [10.701522670464463]
multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can proficiently evaluate visual quality through interpretable assessments.<n>We propose a unified two-stage training framework comprising a cold-start stage and a reinforcement learning-based fine-tuning stage.<n>We designate the models derived from these two stages as Q-Ponder-CI and Q-Ponder.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T10:11:51Z) - Towards Generalized Video Quality Assessment: A Weak-to-Strong Learning Paradigm [76.63001244080313]
Video quality assessment (VQA) seeks to predict the perceptual quality of a video in alignment with human visual perception.<n>The dominant VQA paradigm relies on supervised training with human-labeled datasets.<n>We explore weak-to-strong (W2S) learning as a new paradigm for advancing VQA without reliance on large-scale human-labeled datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-06T15:29:32Z) - Towards Robust Extractive Question Answering Models: Rethinking the Training Methodology [0.34530027457862006]
Previous research has shown that existing models, when trained on EQA datasets that include unanswerable questions, demonstrate a significant lack of robustness.
Our proposed training method includes a novel loss function for the EQA problem and challenges an implicit assumption present in numerous EQA datasets.
Our models exhibit significantly enhanced robustness against two types of adversarial attacks, with a performance decrease of only about a third compared to the default models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-29T20:35:57Z) - Loss re-scaling VQA: Revisiting the LanguagePrior Problem from a
Class-imbalance View [129.392671317356]
We propose to interpret the language prior problem in VQA from a class-imbalance view.
It explicitly reveals why the VQA model tends to produce a frequent yet obviously wrong answer.
We also justify the validity of the class imbalance interpretation scheme on other computer vision tasks, such as face recognition and image classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-30T00:57:17Z) - Contrast and Classify: Training Robust VQA Models [60.80627814762071]
We propose a novel training paradigm (ConClaT) that optimize both cross-entropy and contrastive losses.
We find that optimizing both losses -- either alternately or jointly -- is key to effective training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-13T00:23:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.