Type-IV Code Clone Detection via Layer-Wise Non-Contrastive Representation Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17338v1
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:42:06 GMT
- Title: Type-IV Code Clone Detection via Layer-Wise Non-Contrastive Representation Learning
- Abstract summary: Software clones are fragments of code that are similar or functionally equivalent to each other.<n>Detecting Type-IV clones, which are semantically equivalent but may differ syntactically, is difficult for traditional token- or syntax-based methods.<n>We propose LWVIC4Code, a non-contrastive representation learning approach specifically designed for Type-IV clone detection.
- Score: 1.1386245013335434
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Software clones are fragments of code that are similar or functionally equivalent to each other. They pose significant challenges for maintenance, refactoring, and bug detection. Detecting Type-IV clones, which are semantically equivalent but may differ syntactically, is particularly difficult for traditional token- or syntax-based methods. Recent machine learning approaches rely on contrastive learning, which requires careful negative sampling and can introduce bias. In this paper, we propose LWVIC4Code, a non-contrastive representation learning approach specifically designed for Type-IV clone detection. Building on the Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization (VICReg) framework and prior layer-wise VICReg training, LWVIC4Code introduces cross-layer consistency regularization and depth-dependent layer weighting to progressively refine semantic information across transformer layers, producing robust and discriminative code representations. We conduct an empirical study comparing LWVIC4Code against a contrastive learning baseline and zero-shot large language models on Python (Kamino) and multi-language (GPTCloneBench) datasets. Results show that LWVIC4Code achieves competitive or superior performance without negative samples, benefits from layer-wise supervision, and generalizes effectively from Python to other languages, particularly Java and C#. These results demonstrate that non-contrastive, layer-wise representation learning is a promising direction for robust semantic code clone detection.
Related papers
- Invariant Pretraining for Robust Code Representations [8.667720376952728]
Under invariant programs, semantically equivalent code written in different syntactic forms, learned representations degrade substantially.<n>We present an empirical study of this robustness gap across four encoder baselines, two downstream tasks, and four datasets.<n>Our method, invariant pretraining (InvPT), applies semantic-preserving transformations to the corpus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-15T21:01:43Z) - Semantic Code Clone Detection: Are We There Yet? [30.160018956984853]
Code clone detection has been extensively studied for decades.<n>Recent approaches have reported remarkably high performance for semantic (Type-4) clones on benchmark datasets.<n>We present the first systematic empirical study investigating the generalizability of state-of-the-art semantic code clone detectors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-24T01:11:40Z) - CodeRL+: Improving Code Generation via Reinforcement with Execution Semantics Alignment [98.87395842351627]
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at code generation by learning from vast code corpora.<n>A fundamental semantic gap remains between their training on textual patterns and the goal of functional correctness.<n>We propose CodeRL+, a novel approach that integrates execution semantics alignment into the RLVR training pipeline for code generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T09:48:06Z) - HyClone: Bridging LLM Understanding and Dynamic Execution for Semantic Code Clone Detection [3.2167919219391474]
Code clone detection is a critical task in software engineering, aimed at identifying duplicated or similar code fragments within or across software systems.<n>Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in understanding code semantics.<n>We propose a novel two-stage framework that combines LLM-based screening with execution-based validation for detecting semantic clones in Python programs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-02T13:11:56Z) - OASIS: Order-Augmented Strategy for Improved Code Search [13.64129055694081]
We propose a novel order-augmented strategy for improved code search (OASIS)<n>It leverages order-based similarity labels to train models to capture subtle differences in similarity among negative pairs.<n>It underscores the value of exploiting subtle differences among negative pairs with order labels for effective code embedding training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-11T08:26:37Z) - Binary Code Similarity Detection via Graph Contrastive Learning on Intermediate Representations [52.34030226129628]
Binary Code Similarity Detection (BCSD) plays a crucial role in numerous fields, including vulnerability detection, malware analysis, and code reuse identification.
In this paper, we propose IRBinDiff, which mitigates compilation differences by leveraging LLVM-IR with higher-level semantic abstraction.
Our extensive experiments, conducted under varied compilation settings, demonstrate that IRBinDiff outperforms other leading BCSD methods in both One-to-one comparison and One-to-many search scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T09:09:20Z) - ZC3: Zero-Shot Cross-Language Code Clone Detection [79.53514630357876]
We propose a novel method named ZC3 for Zero-shot Cross-language Code Clone detection.
ZC3 designs the contrastive snippet prediction to form an isomorphic representation space among different programming languages.
Based on this, ZC3 exploits domain-aware learning and cycle consistency learning to generate representations that are aligned among different languages are diacritical for different types of clones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-26T03:48:10Z) - CONCORD: Clone-aware Contrastive Learning for Source Code [64.51161487524436]
Self-supervised pre-training has gained traction for learning generic code representations valuable for many downstream SE tasks.
We argue that it is also essential to factor in how developers code day-to-day for general-purpose representation learning.
In particular, we propose CONCORD, a self-supervised, contrastive learning strategy to place benign clones closer in the representation space while moving deviants further apart.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-05T20:39:08Z) - Enhancing Semantic Code Search with Multimodal Contrastive Learning and
Soft Data Augmentation [50.14232079160476]
We propose a new approach with multimodal contrastive learning and soft data augmentation for code search.
We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on a large-scale dataset with six programming languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-07T08:49:27Z) - An Exploratory Study on Code Attention in BERT [8.488193857572211]
We investigate the attention behavior of PLM on code and compare it with natural language.
We show that BERT pays more attention to syntactic entities, specifically identifiers and separators, in contrast to the most attended token in NLP.
The findings can benefit the research community by using code-specific representations instead of applying the common embeddings used in NLP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-05T21:23:10Z) - Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representations [171.3046900127166]
Prototypical Contrastive Learning (PCL) is an unsupervised representation learning method.
PCL implicitly encodes semantic structures of the data into the learned embedding space.
PCL outperforms state-of-the-art instance-wise contrastive learning methods on multiple benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-11T09:53:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.