Fugu-MT: arxivの論文翻訳

Model-Driven Discipline for Multi-Agent LLMs: Requirement-to-Verification Generation of Traceable System Models

Authors Ran Wei, Le Zhu, Haochi Wang, Ruizhe Yang, Jiapeng Guan, Siyuan Ji, Yuchen Hu, Zhe Jiang, Xiangyang Ji
Affiliations Harbin Institute of Technology / Southeast University / Tsinghua University / Lancaster University / Dalian University of Technology / Loughborough University
Categories Method / Model-Driven Engineering / Generation of traceable system models, Application / Multi-Agent Systems / Multi-agent LLM engineering methodology, Evaluation / Change Impact Analysis / Accuracy and automation of impact analysis
License CC BY 4.0

Abstract Overview

This paper presents RADIANT, a requirement-driven engineering methodology that combines model-driven engineering with multi-agent large language models to generate traceable system models across multiple development phases. Starting from a manually authored requirement model, the approach generates a concept model, a domain-specific modelling language, a conforming system model, and a behaviour model, together with executable element-level traceability links. The behaviour models are translated into CSP and checked with FDR for properties such as deadlock freedom and convergence, with a repair loop driven by counterexamples. The paper evaluates the pipeline on an autonomous underwater vehicle case study, compares multi-agent and single-agent configurations across three LLMs, and examines change-impact analysis, efficiency, and transfer to a second robotic domain.

Novelty

The distinctive contribution is an end-to-end, requirement-to-verification methodology that generates heterogeneous engineering models and executable traceability links by construction, rather than recovering links after the fact. It integrates a generic multi-agent generate/check/refactor/trace architecture with formal verification and automated change-impact analysis in a unified model-driven workflow.

Results

Across three LLMs, the multi-agent decomposition consistently improved the syntactic validity of generated formal artefacts, and improved executability where the underlying model's code generation was strong enough, although semantic gains were model-dependent. On the AUV case study, the generated behaviour model was formally verified as deadlock-free and convergent, change-impact analysis achieved exact impact identification, and a six-participant study reported roughly a 10-15x reduction in development time versus manual modelling. The unchanged pipeline also successfully transferred to a second robotic domain, producing passing artefacts in all phases.

Key Points

  1. RADIANT uses a manually created requirement model as the sole authored input and automatically derives downstream concept, DSML, system, behaviour, and traceability artefacts.
  2. Its traceability mechanism is executable and element-level, enabling automated change-impact analysis across heterogeneous models rather than relying on soft or post hoc recovered links.
  3. The empirical evaluation shows robust gains in artefact validity from the multi-agent workflow, substantial efficiency improvements over manual modelling, and successful transfer to a second case study.

References

This page was created using generative AI such as GPT-5, Claude Opus 4, Gemini 3, Gemini 3.1 Flash Image, and their higher-end successor versions. No guarantee can be made regarding its contents.