FuguReport

Coalition-Aware Skill Reliability for Self-Evolving Agents

Authors Qiyan Zhao, Xiaofeng Zhang, Bo Liu, Minda Chen, Wei Xiong, Jingyang Chen, Guanting Ye, Wenhao Yu, Xiaosong Yuan, Shijie Han, Da-Han Wang, Jianmin Ji, Fei Huang, Xu-Yao Zhang
Affiliations Chinese Academy of Sciences / LongShine AI Lab / University of Science and Technology of China / The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology / Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Categories Method / Skill Reliability / Reliability interventions in skill selection, Task / Multi-Agent Coordination / Coalition impact on skill contribution, Evaluation / Skill Transfer Evaluation / Label-free skill masking effect
License CC BY 4.0

Abstract Overview

This paper investigates whether skills stored in self-evolving LLM agents' skill banks make positive mechanistic contributions rather than merely improving aggregate outcome metrics. Through a Skill Mechanistic Reliability Audit (SMRA), the authors identify two failure modes: coalition pollution, where bank-level gains mask individual skills with zero or negative coalition-level contributions, and cross-domain utility reversal, where skills helpful in a source domain degrade performance after transfer. To address these issues, the authors propose Coalition-Aware Skill Selection (CASS) for skill accumulation and the Unsupervised Skill-Masked Coalition Optimizer (u-SMCO) for post-transfer masking. The work demonstrates that skill reliability is a joint property of the individual skill, the surrounding skill bank, and the target deployment domain.

Novelty

The paper reframes agent skill reliability as a coalition- and domain-dependent property rather than an intrinsic attribute of individual skills. It introduces two targeted interventions: CASS, which uses Monte Carlo sampled Shapley marginals to gate skill accumulation during evolution, and u-SMCO, which uses label-free target-domain retrieval quality knockouts to greedily mask utility-reversing skills post-transfer.

Results

Evaluations across LoCoMo, LongMemEval, HotpotQA, and ALFWorld show that CASS and u-SMCO consistently outperform strong self-evolving agent baselines such as MemSkill. CASS admitted significantly fewer candidate skills than standard outcome gates while avoiding net-negative additions, and u-SMCO improved transfer performance on all tested trained banks without requiring target-domain supervision.

Key Points

  1. SMRA reveals that outcome-only gates are structurally blind to coalition pollution during skill evolution and cross-domain utility reversal during transfer.
  2. CASS incorporates sampled coalition knockouts and Shapley marginal contributions into the gating mechanism to admit only skills with verified coalition-conditioned reliability.
  3. u-SMCO evaluates retrieval-quality knockouts on unlabeled target-domain queries to identify and mask transferred skills whose presence degrades target-domain behavior.

References

This page was created using generative AI such as GPT-5, Claude Opus 4, Gemini 3, Gemini 3.1 Flash Image, and their higher-end successor versions. No guarantee can be made regarding its contents.