Fugu-MT: arxivの論文翻訳

Tail-Likelihood Reinforcement Learning

Authors Shrinivas Ramasubramanian, Daman Arora, Fahim Tajwar, Guanning Zeng, Qingyang Wu, Zhongzhu Zhou, Chenfeng Xu, Haiwen Feng, Yuda Song, Aarti Singh, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, J. Andrew Bagnell, Jeff Schneider, Andrea Zanette
Affiliations Together AI / Aurora Innovation / Impossible, Inc. / University of California, Berkeley / Carnegie Mellon University
Categories Method / Reinforcement Learning / Tail-likelihood based learning, Task / Policy Optimization / Maximizing reward log-probability, Application / RL Pipeline Integration / Compatibility with standard RL frameworks
License CC BY 4.0

Abstract Overview

This paper proposes Tail-Likelihood Reinforcement Learning (TailRL), an RL objective for continuous rewards that maximizes the expected log-probability of exceeding a uniformly sampled reward threshold. The method reframes a continuous reward as a family of binary tail events and emphasizes reward levels that are rarely reached, rather than optimizing only mean reward. The paper shows that TailRL decomposes into a harmonic mixture of Best-of-k gradients and reduces exactly to MaxRL in the binary-reward case. It also derives an unbiased finite-rollout estimator that changes only the rollout weighting or advantage computation, making the method compatible with standard critic-free RL pipelines. Empirically, the authors evaluate TailRL on object localization, text-maze navigation, GUI grounding, and code runtime optimization.

Novelty

The main novelty is an RL objective that integrates log tail probabilities over all reward thresholds, providing a continuous-reward analogue of likelihood-based success optimization. A distinctive theoretical result is the exact harmonic decomposition into Best-of-k gradients, which ties training directly to inference-time sampling performance without requiring the selection of a single target k.

Results

Across four tasks, TailRL consistently improves coverage of high-reward outcomes relative to expected-reward baselines such as GRPO and RLOO. Demonstrated results include matching or exceeding supervised localization objectives, learning from maze policies with approximately 0.01% initial shortest-path success where expected-reward baselines fail, matching RLOO's Pass@1024 in GUI grounding with 128x to 256x fewer inference rollouts, and achieving a 7.7x Best-of-1024 speedup in code optimization while GRPO and RLOO collapse to copying the input.

Key Points

  1. TailRL optimizes the log-likelihood of exceeding reward thresholds, up-weighting rare high-reward rollouts instead of treating all tail probabilities equally.
  2. The method provides an unbiased finite-rollout estimator that only modifies rollout weights or advantages, where larger rollout groups correspond to optimizing higher-order truncations of the TailRL objective rather than merely reducing variance.
  3. Empirical evaluations show TailRL is especially effective when strong outcomes are attainable but rare, preventing policy collapse onto safe suboptimal shortcuts and improving scaling with inference compute.

References

This page was created using generative AI such as GPT-5, Claude Opus 4, Gemini 3, Gemini 3.1 Flash Image, and their higher-end successor versions. No guarantee can be made regarding its contents.