Diffusion Reward Models
Abstract Overview
This paper proposes Diffusion Reward Models (DRM), which recast reward modeling as conditional density estimation over rewards given a prompt-response pair rather than predicting a single scalar score. The method uses a frozen LLM encoder and a lightweight diffusion transformer head to model reward distributions without assuming a fixed parametric family, and the same framework supports both multi-attribute regression and pairwise preference training. At inference, DRM produces multiple reward samples that can be summarized into means, variances, or quantiles, enabling both standard scalar scoring and distribution-aware decision rules. The evaluation spans five public reward-model benchmarks, analyses of human disagreement, and downstream RLHF experiments.
Novelty
The main novelty is replacing conventional scalar or fixed-family parametric reward heads with a diffusion-based head that models the full conditional reward distribution non-parametrically. The framework provides a unified architecture for both multi-attribute regression and pairwise preference data while introducing a reward-axis test-time scaling mechanism via repeated diffusion sampling.
Results
Under matched data and backbone, DRM-Multi-8B achieves a 66.2 average benchmark score, outperforming ArmoRM (62.3) and QRM-Llama3.1-8B-v2 (64.1). In distributional evaluations, DRM aligns more closely with human rating distributions than baselines, with uncertainty-aware rejection and lower-confidence-bound aggregation improving decision accuracy. When used as the training reward in downstream RLHF, DRM-Multi improves policy performance on Arena-Hard v2 from 1.3 to 2.0 and MT-Bench from 73.6 to 74.8 over the FsfairX baseline.
Key Points
- DRM models reward as a non-parametric conditional distribution using a Diffusion Transformer head on top of a frozen LLM encoder.
- The architecture supports both multi-attribute supervision and pairwise preference objectives while enabling reward-axis test-time scaling through multiple reverse diffusion samples.
- Evaluations across five RM benchmarks, human disagreement analyses, and downstream RLHF demonstrate superior performance over matched baselines and effective risk-sensitive aggregation.
References
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33803v1
- Fugu-MT: https://fugumt.com/fugumt/paper_check/2609.33803v1
- GitHub: https://github.com/thunlp/DRM
- Hugging Face: https://huggingface.co/Teburile/DRM