Fugu-MT: arxivの論文翻訳

ReSI: Recursive Safety Improvement toward Resistant and Resilient AI

Authors Jingnan Zheng, Dongcheng Zhang, Yi Zhang, Ming Zhang, Qiaosheng Zhang, Youbang Sun, An Zhang, Xiangnan He, Tat-Seng Chua, Xia Hu, Bowen Zhou, Chaochao Lu, Xiang Wang
Affiliations University of Science and Technology of China / Shanghai AI Laboratory / Shanghai Jiao Tong University / National University of Singapore / Tsinghua University
Categories Method / Self-Improvement / Recursive safety improvement framework, Evaluation / Model Safety Evaluation / Vulnerability assessment via red teaming, Application / AI Safety / Improving AI system resilience and resistance
License CC BY 4.0

Abstract Overview

ReSI is a recursive safety improvement framework that treats model safety alignment as an iterative loop of red-teaming, automated recipe search, and validated model updates. In each round, it identifies vulnerabilities in the current model using multiple red-teaming methods, screens candidate alignment recipes with pilot runs, and advances only updates that improve safety while meeting capability-retention criteria. The framework searches over attack-data sources, alignment methods, training mixtures, and hyperparameters, with a Pareto gate enforcing safety gains alongside retained instruction following and benign compliance. Across four dense and mixture-of-experts models, the paper reports improved in-distribution safety, stronger robustness to unseen attack mechanisms, and mostly preserved general capabilities.

Novelty

The distinctive contribution is framing safety alignment itself as a bounded recursive self-improvement process, operationalized through automated research rather than a fixed training recipe. ReSI also combines iterative red-teaming with a structured search over alignment methods and recipe components, while using a fixed Pareto gate to prevent safety gains from propagating if they degrade utility too much.

Results

Across four evaluated models, ReSI reduces attack success rates on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution safety benchmarks, often outperforming the A3 baseline and matching or exceeding MAGIC in most reported comparisons. The paper highlights a reduction in mean X-Teaming attack success rate from 86.01% to 31.45% across the four models, with all four ReSI-aligned models reported below the evaluated frontier-model range on that benchmark. Reported capability retention is generally strong, with benign compliance improving for some models and instruction-following accuracy remaining close to backbone levels, though some capability losses appear for Ministral.

Key Points

  1. ReSI organizes safety improvement into repeated rounds of red-teaming assessment, pilot screening, full-scale refinement, and gated model updating.
  2. The framework explicitly targets both resistance to known attacks and resilience to unseen attacks by training on discovered vulnerabilities and testing on held-out attack mechanisms such as H-CoT and X-Teaming.
  3. Empirically, ReSI improves safety across four model families while largely preserving benign compliance and general capabilities under its Pareto-based selection rule.

References

This page was created using generative AI such as GPT-5, Claude Opus 4, Gemini 3, Gemini 3.1 Flash Image, and their higher-end successor versions. No guarantee can be made regarding its contents.