The Demise of Single-Authored Publications in Computer Science: A Citation Network Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.00350v1
• Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:47:44 GMT
• Title: The Demise of Single-Authored Publications in Computer Science: A Citation Network Analysis
• Authors: Brian K. Ryu
• Abstract summary: I analyze the DBLP database to study role of single author publications in the computer science literature between 1940 and 2019. I examine the demographics and reception by computing the population fraction, citation statistics, and scores of single author publications over the years.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this study, I analyze the DBLP bibliographic database to study role of single author publications in the computer science literature between 1940 and 2019. I examine the demographics and reception by computing the population fraction, citation statistics, and PageRank scores of single author publications over the years. Both the population fraction and reception have been continuously declining since the 1940s. The overall decaying trend of single author publications is qualitatively consistent with those observed in other scientific disciplines, though the diminution is taking place several decades later than those in the natural sciences. Additionally, I analyze the scope and volume of single author publications, using page length and reference count as first-order approximations of the scope of publications. Although both metrics on average show positive correlations with citation count, single author papers show no significant difference in page or reference counts compared to the rest of the publications, suggesting that there exist other factors that impact the citations of single author publications.

Related papers

• Distinct citation distributions complicate research evaluations. A single indicator that universally reveals research efficiency cannot be formulated [0.0]
  Size-independent, top percentile-based indicators are accurate when the global ranks of local publications fit a power law. deviations in the least cited papers are frequent in countries and occur in all journals with high impact factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T10:16:21Z)
• Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers [99.67983375899719]
  We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals. Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T17:45:15Z)
• Position: AI/ML Influencers Have a Place in the Academic Process [82.2069685579588]
  We investigate the role of social media influencers in enhancing the visibility of machine learning research. We have compiled a comprehensive dataset of over 8,000 papers, spanning tweets from December 2018 to October 2023. Our statistical and causal inference analysis reveals a significant increase in citations for papers endorsed by these influencers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T20:05:49Z)
• Analyzing the State of Computer Science Research with the DBLP Discovery Dataset [0.0]
  We conduct a scientometric analysis to uncover the implicit patterns hidden in CS metadata. We introduce the CS-Insights system, an interactive web application to analyze CS publications with various dashboards, filters, and visualizations. Both D3 and CS-Insights are open-access, and CS-Insights can be easily adapted to other datasets in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T16:27:42Z)
• Geographic Citation Gaps in NLP Research [63.13508571014673]
  This work asks a series of questions on the relationship between geographical location and publication success. We first created a dataset of 70,000 papers from the ACL Anthology, extracted their meta-information, and generated their citation network. We show that not only are there substantial geographical disparities in paper acceptance and citation but also that these disparities persist even when controlling for a number of variables such as venue of publication and sub-field of NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T02:25:23Z)
• Scientific Impact of Graph-Based Approaches in Deep Learning Studies -- A Bibliometric Comparison [0.0]
  It's outlined that deep learning-based studies gained momentum after year 2013, and the rate of graph-based approaches in all deep learning studies increased linearly from 1% to 4% within the following 10 years. Despite their similar performance in recent years, graph-based studies show twice more citation performance as they get older, compared to traditional approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T20:23:43Z)
• Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Review [52.359007622096684]
  Peer review is a key component of the publishing process in most fields of science. Existing NLP studies focus on the analysis of individual texts. editorial assistance often requires modeling interactions between pairs of texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T16:39:38Z)
• Cross-Lingual Citations in English Papers: A Large-Scale Analysis of Prevalence, Usage, and Impact [0.0]
  We present an analysis of cross-lingual citations based on over one million English papers. Among our findings are an increasing rate of citations to publications written in Chinese. To facilitate further research, we make our collected data and source code publicly available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-07T15:34:02Z)
• A Measure of Research Taste [91.3755431537592]
  We present a citation-based measure that rewards both productivity and taste. The presented measure, CAP, balances the impact of publications and their quantity. We analyze the characteristics of CAP for highly-cited researchers in biology, computer science, economics, and physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T18:01:47Z)
• Enhancing Scientific Papers Summarization with Citation Graph [78.65955304229863]
  We redefine the task of scientific papers summarization by utilizing their citation graph. We construct a novel scientific papers summarization dataset Semantic Scholar Network (SSN) which contains 141K research papers in different domains. Our model can achieve competitive performance when compared with the pretrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T11:13:35Z)
• How are journals cited? characterizing journal citations by type of citation [0.0]
  We present initial results on the statistical characterization of citations to journals based on citation function. We also present initial results of characterizing the ratio of supports and disputes received by a journal as a potential indicator of quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T14:15:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.