Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01268v1
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 17:45:15 GMT
- Title: Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers
- Authors: Weixin Liang, Yaohui Zhang, Zhengxuan Wu, Haley Lepp, Wenlong Ji, Xuandong Zhao, Hancheng Cao, Sheng Liu, Siyu He, Zhi Huang, Diyi Yang, Christopher Potts, Christopher D Manning, James Y. Zou,
- Abstract summary: We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals.
Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
- Score: 99.67983375899719
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Scientific publishing lays the foundation of science by disseminating research findings, fostering collaboration, encouraging reproducibility, and ensuring that scientific knowledge is accessible, verifiable, and built upon over time. Recently, there has been immense speculation about how many people are using large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT in their academic writing, and to what extent this tool might have an effect on global scientific practices. However, we lack a precise measure of the proportion of academic writing substantially modified or produced by LLMs. To address this gap, we conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals, using a population-level statistical framework to measure the prevalence of LLM-modified content over time. Our statistical estimation operates on the corpus level and is more robust than inference on individual instances. Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers (up to 17.5%). In comparison, Mathematics papers and the Nature portfolio showed the least LLM modification (up to 6.3%). Moreover, at an aggregate level, our analysis reveals that higher levels of LLM-modification are associated with papers whose first authors post preprints more frequently, papers in more crowded research areas, and papers of shorter lengths. Our findings suggests that LLMs are being broadly used in scientific writings.
Related papers
- LLMs as Research Tools: A Large Scale Survey of Researchers' Usage and Perceptions [20.44227547555244]
Large language models (LLMs) have led many researchers to consider their usage for scientific work.
We present the first large-scale survey of 816 verified research article authors.
We find that 81% of researchers have already incorporated LLMs into different aspects of their research workflow.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-30T04:25:23Z) - LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing [106.45895712717612]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable versatility in various generative tasks.
This study focuses on the topic of LLMs assist NLP Researchers.
To our knowledge, this is the first work to provide such a comprehensive analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T01:30:22Z) - A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery [68.48094108571432]
Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way text and other modalities of data are handled.
We aim to provide a more holistic view of the research landscape by unveiling cross-field and cross-modal connections between scientific LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T08:03:24Z) - SciRIFF: A Resource to Enhance Language Model Instruction-Following over Scientific Literature [80.49349719239584]
We present SciRIFF (Scientific Resource for Instruction-Following and Finetuning), a dataset of 137K instruction-following demonstrations for 54 tasks.
SciRIFF is the first dataset focused on extracting and synthesizing information from research literature across a wide range of scientific fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T21:22:08Z) - Large Language Models: A Survey [69.72787936480394]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have drawn a lot of attention due to their strong performance on a wide range of natural language tasks.
LLMs' ability of general-purpose language understanding and generation is acquired by training billions of model's parameters on massive amounts of text data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-09T05:37:09Z) - Scientific Large Language Models: A Survey on Biological & Chemical Domains [47.97810890521825]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a transformative power in enhancing natural language comprehension.
The application of LLMs extends beyond conventional linguistic boundaries, encompassing specialized linguistic systems developed within various scientific disciplines.
As a burgeoning area in the community of AI for Science, scientific LLMs warrant comprehensive exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-26T05:33:34Z) - An Interdisciplinary Outlook on Large Language Models for Scientific
Research [3.4108358650013573]
We describe the capabilities and constraints of Large Language Models (LLMs) within disparate academic disciplines, aiming to delineate their strengths and limitations with precision.
We examine how LLMs augment scientific inquiry, offering concrete examples such as accelerating literature review by summarizing vast numbers of publications.
We articulate the challenges LLMs face, including their reliance on extensive and sometimes biased datasets, and the potential ethical dilemmas stemming from their use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T19:41:09Z) - NLLG Quarterly arXiv Report 06/23: What are the most influential current
AI Papers? [15.830129136642755]
The objective is to offer a quick guide to the most relevant and widely discussed research, aiding both newcomers and established researchers in staying abreast of current trends.
We observe the dominance of papers related to Large Language Models (LLMs) and specifically ChatGPT during the first half of 2023.
NLP related papers are the most influential (around 60% of top papers) even though there are twice as many ML related papers in our data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-31T11:53:52Z) - A Bibliometric Review of Large Language Models Research from 2017 to
2023 [1.4190701053683017]
Large language models (LLMs) are language models that have demonstrated outstanding performance across a range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
This paper serves as a roadmap for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to navigate the current landscape of LLMs research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-03T21:46:41Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.