Monitoring Misuse for Accountable 'Artificial Intelligence as a Service'

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.09723v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 18:14:33 GMT
• Title: Monitoring Misuse for Accountable 'Artificial Intelligence as a Service'
• Authors: Seyyed Ahmad Javadi, Richard Cloete, Jennifer Cobbe, Michelle Seng Ah Lee and Jatinder Singh
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces and explores the concept whereby AI providers uncover situations of possible service misuse by their customers. We consider the technical usage patterns that could signal situations warranting scrutiny, and raise some of the legal and technical challenges of monitoring for misuse.
• Score: 6.562256987706127
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: AI is increasingly being offered 'as a service' (AIaaS). This entails service providers offering customers access to pre-built AI models and services, for tasks such as object recognition, text translation, text-to-voice conversion, and facial recognition, to name a few. The offerings enable customers to easily integrate a range of powerful AI-driven capabilities into their applications. Customers access these models through the provider's APIs, sending particular data to which models are applied, the results of which returned. However, there are many situations in which the use of AI can be problematic. AIaaS services typically represent generic functionality, available 'at a click'. Providers may therefore, for reasons of reputation or responsibility, seek to ensure that the AIaaS services they offer are being used by customers for 'appropriate' purposes. This paper introduces and explores the concept whereby AIaaS providers uncover situations of possible service misuse by their customers. Illustrated through topical examples, we consider the technical usage patterns that could signal situations warranting scrutiny, and raise some of the legal and technical challenges of monitoring for misuse. In all, by introducing this concept, we indicate a potential area for further inquiry from a range of perspectives.

Related papers

• Multi-Agent Actor-Critic Generative AI for Query Resolution and Analysis [1.0124625066746598]
  We introduce MASQRAD, a transformative framework for query resolution based on the actor-critic model. MASQRAD is excellent at translating imprecise or ambiguous user inquiries into precise and actionable requests. MASQRAD functions as a sophisticated multi-agent system but "masquerades" to users as a single AI entity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T04:03:15Z)
• Intelligent Mobile AI-Generated Content Services via Interactive Prompt Engineering and Dynamic Service Provisioning [55.641299901038316]
  AI-generated content can organize collaborative Mobile AIGC Service Providers (MASPs) at network edges to provide ubiquitous and customized content for resource-constrained users. Such a paradigm faces two significant challenges: 1) raw prompts often lead to poor generation quality due to users' lack of experience with specific AIGC models, and 2) static service provisioning fails to efficiently utilize computational and communication resources. We develop an interactive prompt engineering mechanism that leverages a Large Language Model (LLM) to generate customized prompt corpora and employs Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) for policy imitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T03:05:20Z)
• Fundamental Risks in the Current Deployment of General-Purpose AI Models: What Have We (Not) Learnt From Cybersecurity? [60.629883024152576]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have seen rapid deployment in a wide range of use cases. OpenAIs Altera are just a few examples of increased autonomy, data access, and execution capabilities. These methods come with a range of cybersecurity challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T14:44:41Z)
• A Learning-based Incentive Mechanism for Mobile AIGC Service in Decentralized Internet of Vehicles [49.86094523878003]
  We propose a decentralized incentive mechanism for mobile AIGC service allocation. We employ multi-agent deep reinforcement learning to find the balance between the supply of AIGC services on RSUs and user demand for services within the IoV context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T12:46:07Z)
• FhGenie: A Custom, Confidentiality-preserving Chat AI for Corporate and Scientific Use [2.927166196773183]
  We have designed and developed a customized chat AI called FhGenie. Within few days of its release, thousands of Fraunhofer employees started using this service. We discuss challenges, observations, and the core lessons learned from its productive usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T09:43:50Z)
• AI for IT Operations (AIOps) on Cloud Platforms: Reviews, Opportunities and Challenges [60.56413461109281]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) aims to combine the power of AI with the big data generated by IT Operations processes. We discuss in depth the key types of data emitted by IT Operations activities, the scale and challenges in analyzing them, and where they can be helpful. We categorize the key AIOps tasks as - incident detection, failure prediction, root cause analysis and automated actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T15:38:12Z)
• Guiding AI-Generated Digital Content with Wireless Perception [69.51950037942518]
  We introduce an integration of wireless perception with AI-generated content (AIGC) to improve the quality of digital content production. The framework employs a novel multi-scale perception technology to read user's posture, which is difficult to describe accurately in words, and transmits it to the AIGC model as skeleton images. Since the production process imposes the user's posture as a constraint on the AIGC model, it makes the generated content more aligned with the user's requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-26T04:39:03Z)
• Advances in Automatically Rating the Trustworthiness of Text Processing Services [9.696492590163016]
  AI services are known to have unstable behavior when subjected to changes in data, models or users. The current approach of assessing AI services in a black box setting, where the consumer does not have access to the AI's source code or training data, is limited. Our approach is inspired by the success of nutritional labeling in food industry to promote health and seeks to assess and rate AI services for trust from the perspective of an independent stakeholder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-04T14:27:46Z)
• Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of "Artificial Intelligence as a Service" [6.824692201913679]
  "AI as a Service" (AI as a Service) is a rapidly growing market, offering various plug-and-play AI services and tools. Yet, it is known that AI systems can encapsulate biases and inequalities that can have societal impact. This paper argues that the context-sensitive nature of fairness is often incompatible with AI' 'one-size-fits-all' approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T22:32:10Z)
• Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
  Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps. We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches. We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z)
• On-Premise Artificial Intelligence as a Service for Small and Medium Size Setups [0.541530201129053]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies are moving from customized deployments in specific domains towards generic solutions horizontally permeating vertical domains and industries. While various commercial solutions offer user friendly and easy to use AI as a Service (AI), functionality-wise enabling the democratization of such ecosystems are lagging behind. In this chapter, we discuss AI functionality and corresponding technology stack and analyze possible realizations using open source user friendly technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T09:28:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.