The Price of Incentivizing Exploration: A Characterization via Thompson Sampling and Sample Complexity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00558v6
• Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 19:54:20 GMT
• Title: The Price of Incentivizing Exploration: A Characterization via Thompson Sampling and Sample Complexity
• Authors: Mark Sellke, Aleksandrs Slivkins
• Abstract summary: We consider incentivized exploration: a version of multi-armed bandits where the choice of arms is controlled by self-interested agents. We focus on the price of incentives: the loss in performance, broadly construed, incurred for the sake of incentive-compatibility.
• Score: 83.81297078039836
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We consider incentivized exploration: a version of multi-armed bandits where the choice of arms is controlled by self-interested agents, and the algorithm can only issue recommendations. The algorithm controls the flow of information, and the information asymmetry can incentivize the agents to explore. Prior work achieves optimal regret rates up to multiplicative factors that become arbitrarily large depending on the Bayesian priors, and scale exponentially in the number of arms. A more basic problem of sampling each arm once runs into similar factors. We focus on the price of incentives: the loss in performance, broadly construed, incurred for the sake of incentive-compatibility. We prove that Thompson Sampling, a standard bandit algorithm, is incentive-compatible if initialized with sufficiently many data points. The performance loss due to incentives is therefore limited to the initial rounds when these data points are collected. The problem is largely reduced to that of sample complexity: how many rounds are needed? We address this question, providing matching upper and lower bounds and instantiating them in various corollaries. Typically, the optimal sample complexity is polynomial in the number of arms and exponential in the "strength of beliefs".

Related papers

• Best Arm Identification in Batched Multi-armed Bandit Problems [3.908867017036043]
  Recently multi-armed bandit problem arises in many real-life scenarios where arms must be sampled in batches. We introduce a general linear programming framework that can incorporate objectives of different theoretical settings in best arm identification. We demonstrate by numerical studies that the algorithm also has good performance compared to certain UCB-type or Thompson sampling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T14:16:38Z)
• Best Arm Identification with Fixed Budget: A Large Deviation Perspective [54.305323903582845]
  We present sred, a truly adaptive algorithm that can reject arms in it any round based on the observed empirical gaps between the rewards of various arms. In particular, we present sred, a truly adaptive algorithm that can reject arms in it any round based on the observed empirical gaps between the rewards of various arms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T13:17:43Z)
• Thompson Exploration with Best Challenger Rule in Best Arm Identification [66.33448474838342]
  We study the fixed-confidence best arm identification problem in the bandit framework. We propose a novel policy that combines Thompson sampling with a computationally efficient approach known as the best challenger rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T01:37:02Z)
• Incentivizing Exploration with Linear Contexts and Combinatorial Actions [9.15749739027059]
  In incentivized bandit exploration, arm choices are viewed as recommendations and are required to be Bayesian incentive compatible. Recent work has shown under certain independence assumptions that after collecting enough initial samples, the popular Thompson sampling algorithm becomes incentive compatible. We give an analog of this result for linear bandits, where the independence of the prior is replaced by a natural convexity condition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T03:30:42Z)
• Incentivizing Combinatorial Bandit Exploration [87.08827496301839]
  Consider a bandit algorithm that recommends actions to self-interested users in a recommendation system. Users are free to choose other actions and need to be incentivized to follow the algorithm's recommendations. While the users prefer to exploit, the algorithm can incentivize them to explore by leveraging the information collected from the previous users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T13:46:25Z)
• Optimal Clustering with Bandit Feedback [57.672609011609886]
  This paper considers the problem of online clustering with bandit feedback. It includes a novel stopping rule for sequential testing that circumvents the need to solve any NP-hard weighted clustering problem as its subroutines. We show through extensive simulations on synthetic and real-world datasets that BOC's performance matches the lower boundally, and significantly outperforms a non-adaptive baseline algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T06:05:05Z)
• Adaptive Algorithms for Multi-armed Bandit with Composite and Anonymous Feedback [32.62857394584907]
  We study the multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem with composite and anonymous feedback. We propose adaptive algorithms for both the adversarial and non- adversarial cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-13T12:25:41Z)
• Resource Allocation in Multi-armed Bandit Exploration: Overcoming Sublinear Scaling with Adaptive Parallelism [107.48538091418412]
  We study exploration in multi-armed bandits when we have access to a divisible resource that can be allocated in varying amounts to arm pulls. We focus in particular on the allocation of distributed computing resources, where we may obtain results faster by allocating more resources per pull.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-31T18:19:29Z)
• Quantile Multi-Armed Bandits: Optimal Best-Arm Identification and a Differentially Private Scheme [16.1694012177079]
  We study the best-arm identification problem in multi-armed bandits with, potentially private rewards. The goal is to identify the arm with the highest quantile at a fixed, prescribed level. We show that our algorithm is $delta$-PAC and we characterize its sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T20:23:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.