Evidence of disorientation towards immunization on online social media after contrasting political communication on vaccines. Results from an analysis of Twitter data in Italy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00846v5
• Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2021 22:02:29 GMT
• Title: Evidence of disorientation towards immunization on online social media after contrasting political communication on vaccines. Results from an analysis of Twitter data in Italy
• Authors: Samantha Ajovalasit (1), Veronica Dorgali (2), Angelo Mazza (1), Alberto D'Onofrio (3), Piero Manfredi (4) ((1) University of Messina, (2) University of Florence, (3) University of Strathclyde, (4) University of Pisa)
• Abstract summary: In Italy, vaccination coverage for key immunizations as MMR has been declining to worryingly low levels. In 2017, the Italian Gov't expanded the number of mandatory immunizations introducing penalties to unvaccinated children's families. During the 2018 general elections campaign, immunization policy entered the political debate with the Gov't in charge blaming oppositions for fuelling vaccine scepticism.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Background. In Italy, in recent years, vaccination coverage for key immunizations as MMR has been declining to worryingly low levels. In 2017, the Italian Gov't expanded the number of mandatory immunizations introducing penalties to unvaccinated children's families. During the 2018 general elections campaign, immunization policy entered the political debate with the Gov't in charge blaming oppositions for fuelling vaccine scepticism. A new Gov't established in 2018 temporarily relaxed penalties. Objectives and Methods. Using a sentiment analysis on tweets posted in Italian during 2018, we aimed to: (i) characterize the temporal flow of vaccines communication on Twitter (ii) evaluate the polarity of vaccination opinions and usefulness of Twitter data to estimate vaccination parameters, and (iii) investigate whether the contrasting announcements at the highest political level might have originated disorientation amongst the Italian public. Results. Vaccine-relevant tweeters interactions peaked in response to main political events. Out of retained tweets, 70.0% resulted favourable to vaccination, 16.5% unfavourable, and 13.6% undecided, respectively. The smoothed time series of polarity proportions exhibit frequent large changes in the favourable proportion, enhanced by an up and down trend synchronized with the switch between gov't suggesting evidence of disorientation among the public. Conclusion. The reported evidence of disorientation documents that critical immunization topics, should never be used for political consensus. This is especially true given the increasing role of online social media as information source, which might yield to social pressures eventually harmful for vaccine uptake, and is worsened by the lack of institutional presence on Twitter, calling for efforts to contrast misinformation and the ensuing spread of hesitancy.

Related papers

• Public Discourse about COVID-19 Vaccinations: A Computational Analysis of the Relationship between Public Concerns and Policies [3.203095675418499]
  With the rollout of vaccination campaigns, German-speaking regions exhibited much lower vaccination uptake than other European regions. We show that skepticism regarding the severity of the COVID-19 virus and towards efficacy and safety of vaccines were among the prevalent topics in the discourse on Twitter. During later phases of the pandemic, when implemented policies restricted the freedom of unvaccinated citizens, increased vaccination uptake could be observed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T15:31:13Z)
• Global misinformation spillovers in the online vaccination debate before and during COVID-19 [5.1598868036106085]
  Anti-vaccination views pervade online social media, fueling distrust in scientific expertise and increasing vaccine-hesitant individuals. Here, we leverage 316 million vaccine-related Twitter messages in 18 languages to quantify misinformation flows between users exposed to anti-vaccination (no-vax) content. We find that, during the pandemic, no-vax communities became more central in the country-specific debates and their cross-border connections strengthened, revealing a global Twitter anti-vaccination network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T14:32:37Z)
• Suffering from Vaccines or from Government? : Partisan Bias in COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events Coverage [0.0]
  We find that conservative media are inclined to report adverse events more frequently than their liberal counterparts. The users who support the conservative opposing party were more likely to write the popular comments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T14:17:07Z)
• Doctors vs. Nurses: Understanding the Great Divide in Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers [64.1526243118151]
  We find that doctors are overall more positive toward the COVID-19 vaccines. Doctors are more concerned with the effectiveness of the vaccines over newer variants. Nurses pay more attention to the potential side effects on children.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-11T14:22:16Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Echoes through Time: Evolution of the Italian COVID-19 Vaccination Debate [3.9758527669515518]
  We use a Twitter dataset spanning September 2019 - November 2021 to examine the state of polarization around vaccination. We find the stark division between supporters and hesitant individuals to continue throughout the vaccination campaign. However, we find an increasing commonality in the topical focus of the vaccine supporters and vaccine hesitant, pointing to a possible common set of facts the two sides may agree on.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T13:50:19Z)
• Insight from NLP Analysis: COVID-19 Vaccines Sentiments on Social Media [6.965634726663563]
  We collected tweet posts by the UK and US residents from the Twitter API during the pandemic. We performed sentiment analysis by VADER and proposed a new method that can count the individual's influence. The results indicated that celebrities could lead the opinion shift on social media in vaccination progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T03:37:22Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Dark Web Marketplaces and COVID-19: before the vaccine [53.447910186085586]
  We analyse 851,199 listings extracted from 30 dark web marketplaces between January 1, 2020 and November 16, 2020. We identify 788 listings directly related to COVID-19 products and monitor the temporal evolution of product categories. We reveal how the online shadow economy has evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight the importance of a continuous monitoring of DWMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T14:27:41Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
• Falling into the Echo Chamber: the Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter [65.7192861893042]
  We examine the extent to which the vaccination debate on Twitter is conductive to potential outreach to the vaccination hesitant. We discover that the vaccination skeptics, as well as the advocates, reside in their own distinct "echo chambers" At the center of these echo chambers we find the ardent supporters, for which we build highly accurate network- and content-based classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.