Related papers: Echoes through Time: Evolution of the Italian COVID-19 Vaccination Debate

Echoes through Time: Evolution of the Italian COVID-19 Vaccination Debate

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.12943v1
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 13:50:19 GMT
Title: Echoes through Time: Evolution of the Italian COVID-19 Vaccination Debate
Authors: Giuseppe Crupi, Yelena Mejova, Michele Tizzani, Daniela Paolotti, Andre Panisson
Abstract summary: We use a Twitter dataset spanning September 2019 - November 2021 to examine the state of polarization around vaccination. We find the stark division between supporters and hesitant individuals to continue throughout the vaccination campaign. However, we find an increasing commonality in the topical focus of the vaccine supporters and vaccine hesitant, pointing to a possible common set of facts the two sides may agree on.
Score: 3.9758527669515518
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Abstract: Twitter is one of the most popular social media platforms in the country, but pre-pandemic vaccination debate has been shown to be polarized and siloed into echo chambers. It is thus imperative to understand the nature of this discourse, with a specific focus on the vaccination hesitant individuals, whose healthcare decisions may affect their communities and the country at large. In this study we ask, how has the Italian discussion around vaccination changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and have the unprecedented events of 2020-2021 been able to break the echo chamber around this topic? We use a Twitter dataset spanning September 2019 - November 2021 to examine the state of polarization around vaccination. We propose a hierarchical clustering approach to find the largest communities in the endorsement networks of different time periods, and manually illustrate that it produces communities of users sharing a stance. Examining the structure of these networks, as well as textual content of their interactions, we find the stark division between supporters and hesitant individuals to continue throughout the vaccination campaign. However, we find an increasing commonality in the topical focus of the vaccine supporters and vaccine hesitant, pointing to a possible common set of facts the two sides may agree on. Still, we discover a series of concerns voiced by the hesitant community, ranging from unfounded conspiracies (microchips in vaccines) to public health policy discussion (vaccine passport limitations). We recommend an ongoing surveillance of this debate, especially to uncover concerns around vaccination before the public health decisions and official messaging are made public.

Related papers

Global misinformation spillovers in the online vaccination debate before and during COVID-19 [5.1598868036106085]
Anti-vaccination views pervade online social media, fueling distrust in scientific expertise and increasing vaccine-hesitant individuals. Here, we leverage 316 million vaccine-related Twitter messages in 18 languages to quantify misinformation flows between users exposed to anti-vaccination (no-vax) content. We find that, during the pandemic, no-vax communities became more central in the country-specific debates and their cross-border connections strengthened, revealing a global Twitter anti-vaccination network.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-21T14:32:37Z)
Doctors vs. Nurses: Understanding the Great Divide in Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers [64.1526243118151]
We find that doctors are overall more positive toward the COVID-19 vaccines. Doctors are more concerned with the effectiveness of the vaccines over newer variants. Nurses pay more attention to the potential side effects on children.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-11T14:22:16Z)
Vaccine Discourse on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic [0.7161783472741748]
This study investigates posts related to COVID-19 vaccines on Twitter and focuses on those which have a negative stance toward vaccines. A dataset of 16,713,238 English tweets related to COVID-19 vaccines was collected. We show that the negativity with respect to COVID-19 vaccines has decreased over time along with the vaccine roll-outs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-23T13:50:51Z)
"COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
Assessing the influence of French vaccine critics during the two first years of the COVID-19 pandemic [0.0]
We look at the capacity of vaccine-critical activists to influence a wider public on social media during the COVID-19 epidemic. We analyze the evolution of debates over the COVID-19 vaccine on the French Twittosphere, during two first years of the pandemic. While debates over vaccines experienced a surge during this period, the share of vaccine-critical contents in these debates remains stable except for a limited number of short periods associated with specific events.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-22T14:47:41Z)
Dark Web Marketplaces and COVID-19: before the vaccine [53.447910186085586]
We analyse 851,199 listings extracted from 30 dark web marketplaces between January 1, 2020 and November 16, 2020. We identify 788 listings directly related to COVID-19 products and monitor the temporal evolution of product categories. We reveal how the online shadow economy has evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight the importance of a continuous monitoring of DWMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-04T14:27:41Z)
The Ivory Tower Lost: How College Students Respond Differently than the General Public to the COVID-19 Pandemic [66.80677233314002]
Pandemic of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented governments with ultimate challenges. In the United States, the country with the highest confirmed COVID-19 infection cases, a nationwide social distancing protocol has been implemented by the President. This paper aims to discover the social implications of this unprecedented disruption in our interactive society by mining people's opinions on social media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T13:02:38Z)
Digital Ariadne: Citizen Empowerment for Epidemic Control [55.41644538483948]
The COVID-19 crisis represents the most dangerous threat to public health since the H1N1 pandemic of 1918. Technology-assisted location and contact tracing, if broadly adopted, may help limit the spread of infectious diseases. We present a tool, called 'diAry' or 'digital Ariadne', based on voluntary location and Bluetooth tracking on personal devices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-16T15:53:42Z)
Falling into the Echo Chamber: the Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter [65.7192861893042]
We examine the extent to which the vaccination debate on Twitter is conductive to potential outreach to the vaccination hesitant. We discover that the vaccination skeptics, as well as the advocates, reside in their own distinct "echo chambers" At the center of these echo chambers we find the ardent supporters, for which we build highly accurate network- and content-based classifiers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-26T13:55:50Z)
Evidence of disorientation towards immunization on online social media after contrasting political communication on vaccines. Results from an analysis of Twitter data in Italy [0.0]
In Italy, vaccination coverage for key immunizations as MMR has been declining to worryingly low levels. In 2017, the Italian Gov't expanded the number of mandatory immunizations introducing penalties to unvaccinated children's families. During the 2018 general elections campaign, immunization policy entered the political debate with the Gov't in charge blaming oppositions for fuelling vaccine scepticism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-31T11:03:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.