A group-theoretic approach to elimination measurements of qubit
sequences
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02055v2
- Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 15:21:59 GMT
- Title: A group-theoretic approach to elimination measurements of qubit
sequences
- Authors: Mark Hillery, Erika Andersson, and Ittoop Vergheese
- Abstract summary: We show how group theory can be used to design such measurements.
Measurements of this type have proven useful in quantum foundations and in quantum cryptography.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Most measurements are designed to tell you which of several alternatives have
occurred, but it is also possible to make measurements that eliminate
possibilities and tell you an alternative that did not occur. Measurements of
this type have proven useful in quantum foundations and in quantum
cryptography. Here we show how group theory can be used to design such
measurements. After some general considerations, we focus on the case of
measurements on two-qubit states that eliminate one state. We then move on to
construct measurements that eliminate two three-qubit states and four
four-qubit states. A condition that constrains the construction of elimination
measurements is then presented. Finally, in an appendix, we briefly consider
the case of elimination measurements with failure probabilities and an
elimination measurement on $n$-qubit states.
Related papers
- Measurement-Device-Independent Detection of Beyond-Quantum State [53.64687146666141]
We propose a measurement-device-independent (MDI) test for beyond-quantum state detection.
We discuss the importance of tomographic completeness of the input sets to the detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-11T06:40:13Z) - Enhanced Entanglement in the Measurement-Altered Quantum Ising Chain [46.99825956909532]
Local quantum measurements do not simply disentangle degrees of freedom, but may actually strengthen the entanglement in the system.
This paper explores how a finite density of local measurement modifies a given state's entanglement structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T09:51:00Z) - Measurement sharpness and disturbance tradeoff [0.0]
Postmeasurement states for a given measurement are not unique and highly rely on the chosen measurement model.
We show there are different tradeoff relations between the sharpness of this measurement and the average fidelity of the premeasurement and postmeasurement state spaces.
In particular, we show there are different tradeoff relations between the sharpness of this measurement and the average fidelity of the premeasurement and postmeasurement state spaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-08T08:43:39Z) - Discriminating mixed qubit states with collective measurements [0.2621730497733947]
We propose and experimentally demonstrate a protocol for distinguishing two copies of single qubit states using collective measurements.
We implement our measurements on an IBM Q System One device, a superconducting quantum processor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-17T14:02:26Z) - Some Entanglement Survives Most Measurements [1.3812010983144802]
We investigate the limitations of repeated non-projective measurements in preparing a quantum system.
We show that some entanglement remains unless one of the measurement operators becomes perfectly projective.
We present results for $n$-qubit and $n$-dimensional input states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-14T08:02:27Z) - Pure state tomography with parallel unentangled measurements [0.9746724603067647]
We focus on the QST of a pure quantum state using parallel unentangled measurements.
We propose two sets of quantum measurements that one can make on a pure state as well as the algorithms that use the measurements outcomes in order to identify the state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-08T09:49:55Z) - Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous two-out-of-four
quantum state elimination [52.77024349608834]
A core principle of quantum theory is that non-orthogonal quantum states cannot be perfectly distinguished with single-shot measurements.
Here we implement a quantum state elimination measurement which unambiguously rules out two of four pure, non-orthogonal quantum states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T18:00:01Z) - Experimentally determining the incompatibility of two qubit measurements [55.41644538483948]
We describe and realize an experimental procedure for assessing the incompatibility of two qubit measurements.
We demonstrate this fact in an optical setup, where the qubit states are encoded into the photons' polarization degrees of freedom.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-15T19:01:44Z) - Observing a Topological Transition in Weak-Measurement-Induced Geometric
Phases [55.41644538483948]
Weak measurements in particular, through their back-action on the system, may enable various levels of coherent control.
We measure the geometric phases induced by sequences of weak measurements and demonstrate a topological transition in the geometric phase controlled by measurement strength.
Our results open new horizons for measurement-enabled quantum control of many-body topological states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-10T19:00:00Z) - On the optimal certification of von Neumann measurements [55.41644538483948]
certification of quantum measurements can be viewed as the extension of quantum hypotheses testing.
We show the connection between the certification of quantum channels or von Neumann measurements and the notion of $q$-numerical range.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-14T22:38:23Z) - Quantum State Discrimination via Repeated Measurements and the Rule of
Three [0.0]
We consider minimum error state discrimination for mutually orthogonal states with a noisy measurement.
We identify a 'rule of three', where no change in probability is obtained from a second measurement but there is noticeable improvement after a third.
We also provide partial results for $N$-valued commutative measurements where the rule of three remains, but the general pattern present in binary measurements is no longer satisfied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-28T19:09:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.