Learning to rank for uplift modeling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.05897v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 07:37:16 GMT
• Title: Learning to rank for uplift modeling
• Authors: Floris Devriendt, Tias Guns and Wouter Verbeke
• Abstract summary: We investigate the potential of learning-to-rank techniques in the context of uplift modeling. We propose a unified formalisation of different global uplift modeling measures in use today. We introduce a new metric for learning-to-rank that focusses on optimizing the area under the uplift curve called the promoted cumulative gain (PCG)
• Score: 13.37616530323223
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Uplift modeling has effectively been used in fields such as marketing and customer retention, to target those customers that are most likely to respond due to the campaign or treatment. Uplift models produce uplift scores which are then used to essentially create a ranking. We instead investigate to learn to rank directly by looking into the potential of learning-to-rank techniques in the context of uplift modeling. We propose a unified formalisation of different global uplift modeling measures in use today and explore how these can be integrated into the learning-to-rank framework. Additionally, we introduce a new metric for learning-to-rank that focusses on optimizing the area under the uplift curve called the promoted cumulative gain (PCG). We employ the learning-to-rank technique LambdaMART to optimize the ranking according to PCG and show improved results over standard learning-to-rank metrics and equal to improved results when compared with state-of-the-art uplift modeling. Finally, we show how learning-to-rank models can learn to optimize a certain targeting depth, however, these results do not generalize on the test set.

Related papers

• Learn To Learn More Precisely [30.825058308218047]
  "Learn to learn more precisely" aims to make the model learn precise target knowledge from data. We propose a simple and effective meta-learning framework named Meta Self-Distillation(MSD) to maximize the consistency of learned knowledge. MSD exhibits remarkable performance in few-shot classification tasks in both standard and augmented scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T17:01:26Z)
• Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning [55.96599486604344]
  We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process. We use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals. The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T11:10:24Z)
• Learning Fair Ranking Policies via Differentiable Optimization of Ordered Weighted Averages [55.04219793298687]
  This paper shows how efficiently-solvable fair ranking models can be integrated into the training loop of Learning to Rank. In particular, this paper is the first to show how to backpropagate through constrained optimizations of OWA objectives, enabling their use in integrated prediction and decision models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T20:53:53Z)
• Learning Semantic Proxies from Visual Prompts for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning in Deep Metric Learning [13.964106147449051]
  Existing solutions concentrate on fine-tuning the pre-trained models on conventional image datasets. We propose a novel and effective framework based on learning Visual Prompts (VPT) in the pre-trained Vision Transformers (ViT) We demonstrate that our new approximations with semantic information are superior to representative capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T04:42:05Z)
• Universal Domain Adaptation from Foundation Models: A Baseline Study [58.51162198585434]
  We make empirical studies of state-of-the-art UniDA methods using foundation models. We introduce textitCLIP distillation, a parameter-free method specifically designed to distill target knowledge from CLIP models. Although simple, our method outperforms previous approaches in most benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T16:28:29Z)
• MERMAIDE: Learning to Align Learners using Model-Based Meta-Learning [62.065503126104126]
  We study how a principal can efficiently and effectively intervene on the rewards of a previously unseen learning agent in order to induce desirable outcomes. This is relevant to many real-world settings like auctions or taxation, where the principal may not know the learning behavior nor the rewards of real people. We introduce MERMAIDE, a model-based meta-learning framework to train a principal that can quickly adapt to out-of-distribution agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T15:44:50Z)
• Exploring Heterogeneous Characteristics of Layers in ASR Models for More Efficient Training [1.3999481573773072]
  We study the stability of these layers across runs and model sizes. We propose that group normalization may be used without disrupting their formation. We apply these findings to Federated Learning in order to improve the training procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-08T17:25:19Z)
• Model-based Meta Reinforcement Learning using Graph Structured Surrogate Models [40.08137765886609]
  We show that our model, called a graph structured surrogate model (GSSM), outperforms state-of-the-art methods in predicting environment dynamics. Our approach is able to obtain high returns, while allowing fast execution during deployment by avoiding test time policy gradient optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T17:21:55Z)
• DAGA: Data Augmentation with a Generation Approach for Low-resource Tagging Tasks [88.62288327934499]
  We propose a novel augmentation method with language models trained on the linearized labeled sentences. Our method is applicable to both supervised and semi-supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T07:49:15Z)
• Interpretable Learning-to-Rank with Generalized Additive Models [78.42800966500374]
  Interpretability of learning-to-rank models is a crucial yet relatively under-examined research area. Recent progress on interpretable ranking models largely focuses on generating post-hoc explanations for existing black-box ranking models. We lay the groundwork for intrinsically interpretable learning-to-rank by introducing generalized additive models (GAMs) into ranking tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T01:51:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.